تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,560 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,801,286 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,843,919 |
Sensitivity Analysis of MPSIAC Model | ||
Journal of Rangeland Science | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 1، شماره 4، مهر 2011، صفحه 295-302 اصل مقاله (366.13 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research and Full Length Article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Najmeh Behnam* 1؛ Mansoor Parehkar2؛ Ebrahim Pazira3 | ||
1Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch-Tehran | ||
2Faculty member, Research Institute for Water Scarcity and Drought in Agriculture and Natural Resources (RIWSD), Tehran | ||
3Head of Soil Science Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch-Tehran | ||
چکیده | ||
MPSIAC is currently known as an appropriate method to measure sediment of Watershed basins of the country while there has not been any sensitivity analysis so far for this method. In this study, required data for MPSIAC model were gathered from six basins; Amame-Kamarkhani, Kand-Golandok, Tang Kenesht (from two different references), Nojian (from three different references), Pegahe sorkh katvand (from one reference) and Ivanaki (authors’ research). Eleven sensitivity analyses were conducted and the amount of sediment was calculated using the sum of nine factors. Each input parameter was increased or decreased by 20% using a computer program in Visual Basic in Excel. Then sensitivity of the model for the parameters was analyzed. The less sediment has the basin, the less sensitivity has the input parameters in the model. MPSIAC model has twenty input variables that resulted in nine main factors. Erosion parameter (R) was calculated by adding nine main factors and the quantity of sediment was calculated by an exponential function. By evaluation of nine main factors, it was concluded that land use and Gully development were the most sensitive factors. As a result, based on the area and sensitivity of main factors, more investments must be done on the most sensitive factor to reduce soil erosion. In the assessment of nine main factors occurred errors are reduced due to adding operation. Regarding all items, each factor that has more input quantity has the highest sensitivity. As a result, if score of each factor grows more than six, more attention must be paid to score assignation. If occurred errors in assessment of nine factors did not neutralize each other and have additive or decreasing on the R, by addition of 20% to R, it showed that this factor was the most sensitive factor to run the model. If R is equal to 60 and 20% related to the error occurred in calculation of it, 54% error occurs in estimating the amount of sediment and sensitivity reaches to 2.7. This evaluation indicated that MPSIAC model for evaluation of basins with the amount of sediment more than 2.2 ton/hectare must be used more preciously because the model is so sensitive in this status and possible error may get over 50%. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Sensitivity analysis؛ MPSIAC model؛ Watershed basin؛ Erosion؛ Sediment | ||
مراجع | ||
Asareh. A., Sensitivity analysis LEACHN model than the input parameter in stimulating soil moisture. 2008. Second natural congress of managing irrigation and drainage network. Ahvaz University. (In Persian). Bayat. R., Evaluation of efficiency of sedimentation maps by using MPSIAC and EPM in Taleghan by GIS. 2000. Thesis of master degree. Department of Soil Science. Faculty of agriculture. University of Tehran. (In Persian). Ghodrati. M., Evaluation of sedimentation in Watershed without hydrometer station by using PSIAC in Semnan river basin. 1996. Thesis of master degree. Department of Environment. University of Tehran. (In Persian). Haregeweyn, N., J. Poesen, J. Nyssen, G. Verstraeten, J. D. Vente, G. Govers, S. Deckers and J. Moeyersons. 2005. Specific sediment yield in TigrayNorthern Ethiopia: Assessment and semiquantitative modeling. Geomorphology, 69: 315-331. Hashemi. A. A. 2002. Review and comparing between two models of estimating sediment and erosion in central of Alborz (Semnan Province). Collection of articles national congress land managing-soil erosion and 0.2000 0.1600 0.1200 0.0800 0.0400 0.0000 0.3000 0.2500 0.2000 0.1500 0.1000 0.0500 0.0000 This is trial version www.adultpdf.com J. of Range. Sci., 2011, Vol. 1, No. 4 Sensitivity Analysis …/302 sustainable development. pp: 594-603, (In Persian). Jalalian. A. 1990. Quality and quantity research of soil erosion in north Watershed basin river Karoon. Jour. Iran Natural Resources, 43: 27-45 (In Persian). Johnson, C. W., and K. A. Gebhardt, 1982. Predicting sediment yield from sagebrush rangelands. Proceeding of workshop on estimating erosion and sediment yield on rangelands, Tucson, Arizona, March 1981. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Reviews and Manuals, Western Series, 26: 145-156. Lane, J.W., and Ferrira, V.A. 1982. Sensitivity analysis. In CREAM, A field scale model for chemical, Runoff and EROSIN from Agricultural Management system, (ed.) W.G. Knisel,.Vol. A. Model Documentation. USDA conservation Res. Report No. 26. 113-158. Washington, D.C. Parehkar, M. 1999. Ground Water recharges process under Arid and Semiarid Condition. PhD Thesis. Cranfield University, Bedfordshire UK. Parsaee. L. 2005. Evaluation of efficiency of experimental models (EPM, MPSIAC) in predicting sediment and erosion in Watersheds of Gholestan province, Iran. Central investigation of environmental source. Institute soil conservation and Watershed management. (In Persian). Rafahi. H. G. H. (1997). Water erosion and conservation. Publications of Tehran university pp: 544. Tehran, Iran (In Persian). Rastgoo, S. B. Ghahraman, H. Sanaiinejad, k. Davari and S. R. Khodashenas. 2006. Estimation of erosion and sediment in Tang Kenesht Watershed using MPSIAC and EPM models and GIS, Jour. Agri and Natural Resources Science and Technique, 1: 91-104. (In Persian). Reynard, K.G., and J.J. Stone. 1982. Sediment yield from small semiarid range land watersheds. USDA-SEAARM, Western Series-No: 26: 129-144. Shade, P., 1986. Sediment yield of three drainage basins in Guam. In proceeding of the fourth federal interagency sedimentation conference, pp: 252-260. (In Persian). Shah Karami. A. 1995. Evaluation of sedimentation by using PSIAC, MPSIAC, EPM in Nojian Watershed. Collect of articles national congress land managing. Arak. pp: 562-572. (In Persian). Sheikh Hasani, H. 1995. Evaluation potential sedimentation in erosion units of Watershed basin Taleghan. Thesis for MSc degree. Department of Human Science. University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran. Sokoti Oskoie. R., A. Boroshke, J. Ghodosi, M. Arabkhadri. 2001. Evaluation of efficiency of MPSIAC model in Evaluation of sedimentation five basins of west Azerbaijan Province. Research and Construction, 14: 35-37 (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10,358 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7,405 |