Assessment of DSACC and QPART Algorithms in Ad Hoc Networks

journal of Artificial Intelligence in Electrical Engineering

مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 4، خرداد 2013، صفحه 23-28   

چکیده

The rapid advancement in wireless over wired has augmented the need for improving the
Quality of Service (QoS) over such wireless links. However, the wireless ad hoc networks
have too low bandwidth, and establishing a QoS in these networks is a difficult issue. So,
support of quality of service in ad hoc networks is the topical issue among the network
science researchers. In this research we are going to evaluate the performances of DSACC
(Distributed Scheduling algorithm with Collision Control) and QPART (QoS protocol for Ad
hoc Real Time Traffic) algorithms in different conditions. These two algorithms are able to
support quality of service in ad hoc networks. It should be noted that we have used ns-2
simulator software to compare these two algorithms.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Ad Hoc؛ Quality of service؛ Scheduling؛ Distributed

مراجع

[1] S. Lee, G.-S. Ahn, X. Zhang, and A. T.
Campbell. “INSIGNIA: An IP-Based
Quality of Service Framework for Mobile
Ad Hoc Networks” // Journal of Parallel
and Distributed Computing, Special issue
on Wireless and Mobile Computing and
Communications, 2000, vol.60, pp. 374-
406.
[2] G.-S. Ahn, A. Campbell, A. Veres, and L.-
H. Sun. “Supporting Service
Differentiation for Real-Time and Best-
Effort Traffic in Stateless Wireless Ad Hoc
Networks (SWAN)” // IEEE Transactions
on Mobile Computing, 2002, vol.1,
pp.192–207.
[3] S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt. “Distributed
Quality-of-Service Routing in Ad-Hoc
Networks” // IEEE Journal of Selected
Areas in Communications, 1999, vol.17,
pp. 1454-1465.
[4] T. Chen, M. Gerla, and J. Tsai. “QoS
Routing Performance in a Multi-hop,
Wireless Network” / In Proceedings of the
IEEE ICUPC’97, San Diego, 1997, pp.
557-61.
[5] P. Sinha, R. Sivakumar, and V.
Bharghavan. CEDAR: “A Core-Extraction
Distributed Ad Hoc Routing Algorithm” /
In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
Computer Communications (INFOCOM),
New York, NY, 1999, pp. 202-209.
[6] http://www.csd.uoc.gr/~hy439/reading/802
.11-1999.pdf.
[7] I. Ada and C. Castelluccia.
“Differentiation Mechanisms for IEEE
802.11” / In Proceedings of the IEEE
Conference on Computer Communications
(INFOCOM), Alaska, 2001, pp. 209-218.
[8] F. Cal´i, M. Conti, and E. Gregori.
“Tuning of the IEEE 802.11 Protocol to
Achieve a Theoretical Throughput Limit”
// IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,
2000, vol.8, pp. 785-799.
[9] T. S. Ho and K. C. Chen. “Performance
Evaluation and Enhancement of
CSMA/CA MAC Protocol for 802.11

[10] H. Kim and J. C. Hou. “Improving
Protocol Capacity with Model-based
Frame Scheduling in IEEE 802.11-
operated WLANs” / In Proceedings of the
Ninth Annual International Conference on
Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobi
COM’03), San Diego, 2003, pp. 190-204.
[11] R. Rozovsky and P. Kumar. ” A MAC
Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks” / In
Proceedings of the 2nd -ACM International
Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc
Networking and Computing
(MobiHoc’01), Long Beach, CA, 2001,
pp. 67-75.
[12] A. Veres, A. T. Campbell, M. Barry, and
L.-H. Sun. “Supporting Service
Differentiation in Wireless Packet
Networks Using Control” // IEEE Journal
of Selected Areas in Communications,
2001, vol.19, pp. 2081-2093.
[13] Y. Yang, "Distributed QoS guarantees for
real-time traffic in ad hoc networks".
Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and
Networks, 2004, USA, pp. 118-127.
[14] S.H. Hosseini Nazhad, R.M.Alguliev,
"Light Weight Distributed QoS Adapter in
Large-Scale Ad hoc Networks" // Journal
of American Science, 2011, vol.7, pp. 28-
1251.