Communication Skills of Agricultural Sciences University Teachers in Iran

International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development

مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 1، خرداد 2015، صفحه 33-39   

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.5455/ijamd.158460

نویسنده

Ebrahim Ezzati Larsari^*

Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

This study concerns determining the factors that may influence the communication skill of those university teachers involved in the field of agricultural sciences in Iran. Accordingly, based on a cross-sectional survey method, a conceptual model of communication skill has been devised through reviewing the related literature. Next, the model was revised by the expert panel of the study into a seven-factor model with 58 variables. Then, this revised model was transformed into a questionnaire. Once the expert panel studied, revised and at last confirmed the questionnaire, it was submitted to the subjects, around 234 university teachers of agricultural sciences selected randomly from some main universities in Iran. In order to run Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA), the obtained data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 16.00). Consequently, EFA explained three factors such as naturalness, eloquentness and emotionalness as the main effective
ones on teaching agriculture in the universities of Iran. Finally, it is worth mentioning that naturalness comprised six variables, eloquentness was consisted of eight variables and emotionalness concerned three variables.

کلیدواژه‌ها

agricultural education؛ University teachers؛ Explanatory factor analysis

مراجع

1- Abedini, M., Abassi, A., Mortazavi, F., & Bijari, B. (2013). The effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members from student's prospective in Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 94 – 98. [DOI via Crossref]   

2- Arrington, L. R., & Cheek, J. G. (1990). SAE scope and student achievement in agribusiness and natural resource education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 31(2), 54-60. [DOI via Crossref]   

3- Boone, H. N., Doerfert, D. L., & Elliot, J. (1987). Supervised occupational experience programs:History, philosophy, current status, and future implications. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 28(4), 57-64. [DOI via Crossref]   

4- Dixon, J. K. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis.In: munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research 5th ed., pp. 321-349) New York: Lippincott. 5- Eldelsky, C. (2006). With literacy and justice for all: rethinking the social in language and education (3rd ed.). USA: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates.

6- Edwards, M. C., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Cooperating teacher's perceptions of important elements of the student teaching experience: A focus group approach with quantitative follow-up. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(3), 30-41. [DOI via Crossref]   

7- Hamm, H. P. (2006). Teaching and persuasive communication: class presentation skills: A handbook for faculty, teaching assistants and teaching fellows. Harriest W. Sheridan center for teaching and learning: Brown University, United States.

8- Hargie, O. (2006). The handbook of communication skills. Routledge, London.

9- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

10- McLean, R. C., & Camp, W. G. (2000). An examination of selected agricultural teacher education programs in the United States. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(2), 25-35. [DOI via Crossref]   

11- Pessoca De Carvalho, M. A. (2010). Communication skills for teaching. Physics Research and Teaching Laboratory, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

12- Qadami, A., Salehi, B., Sajjadi, Sh., & Naji, H. (2007). Effective factors on the relationships between students and university teachers based on Arak medical sciences university students. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 7(1) 34-42 (In Persian).

13- Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660. [DOI via Crossref]   

14- Seyameyan, H., Balaqaffari, A., Aligolbandi, K., Rezanejad, S. F., Sharifinik, M., Shahrabi, A., & Qazizadeh, Z. (2012). The characteristics of a good teacher from students' point of view. Mazandaran Medical Sciences Journal, 96,111-115 (in Persian).

15- Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Scaling the heights of interpersonal competence: The effects of alternative response scales on the measurement of interpersonal competence. papers presented at the Western States Communication Association Conference, Seattle, WA.

16- Torabipour, A., & Zahiri, M. (2012). To study the effective factors on teacher-student communication from Jondi Shapoor University students' point of view. Jondi Shapoor Medical Sciences Journal, 11(5), 23-34 (in Persian).

17- Vargas, J. S. (2009). Behavior analysis for effective teaching. New York: Routledge Press.

18- Warmbrod, J. R., & Whittington, M. S. (2004). Methods of teaching agriculture (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/ Prentice Hall.

19- Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6-24. [DOI via Crossref]   

20- Zlatić, L., Bjekić, D., Marinković, S., & Bojović, M. (2014). Development of teacher communication competence. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 606 – 610.