واکنش تابعی کنه‌‌ی‌ شکارگرPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) روی کنه‌ی تارتن دو لکه‌ایTetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) در شرایط آزمایشگاهی

حشره شناسی گیاهان زراعی

مقاله 5، دوره 4، شماره (9) پاییز - زمستان 1393، اردیبهشت 1393، صفحه 59-68   

چکیده

کنه­های تارتن (Tetranychus spp.) از آفات کلیدی محصولات زراعی­محسوب می‌شوند و کنه­ی شکارگرPhytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) مهم­ترین دشمن طبیعی این گروه از کنه‌ها می­باشد. قابلیت سازگاری بالای کنه­های تارتن به شرایط محیطی مختلف باعث فعالیت و خسارت آن­ها روی میزبان­های مختلف و در شرایط متفاوت اقلیمی­شده است. امروزه به­دلیل مقاومت این گروه از کنه‌ها به طیف وسیعی از سموم کاربردی و نیز مشکل باقی­مانده­ی سموم روی محصولات کشاورزی، کنترل بیولژیک آ­ن­ها در اولویت قرار گرفته است. طی این آزمایش واکنش تابعی کنه­ی شکارگر P. persimilis نسبت به تراکم­های مختلف کنه­ی تارتن دو لکه­ای روی برگ­های گیاه لوبیا در شرایط آزمایشگاهی در دمای 1±25 درجه­ی­سلسیوس و رطوبت نسبی 5±70 درصد و شرایط نوری 16:8ساعت(تاریکی:روشنایی) مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. تعیین نوع واکنش تابعی و برآورد پارامترهای آن نشان داد که با توجه به منفی بودن علامت قسمت خطی منحنی، واکنش تابعی از نوع دوم بوده است. نرخ حمله 000587/0±00154/0 بر ساعت و  زمان دست­یابی 3505/0±4150/2 ساعت تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که کنه­ی شکارگر فیتوزئیده می­تواند پتانسیل و کارایی خوبی برای کنترل کنه­های تارتن به­ویژه در تراکم­های پایین آفت داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

واکنش تابعی؛ کنه‌های فیتوزئید؛ کنه‌های تارتن؛ نرخ حمله و زمان دست‌یابی

مراجع

Abd El-Gavad Hany AS, Sayed Aeff MM, Ahmed Sayed A. 2010. Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae to Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4(8): 2182-2187.

Allahyari H, Fard PA, Nozari J. 2004. Effects of host on functional response of offspring in two populations of Trissolcus grandis on the sunn pest.Journal of Applied Entomology 128: 39-43.

Britto EPJ, Manoel GC, Gondim MGC, Torres JB, Fiaboe KKM, Moraes GJ, Knapp M. 2008. Predation and reproductive output of the ladybird beetle Stethorus tridens preying on tomato red spider mite Tetranychus evansi. BioControl 54(3):363-368.

Castagnoli M, Simoni S. 1992. The effect of high temperature on development and survival rate of Amblyseius californicus (McGregor) eggs. Proceedings of Second Symposium EURAAC, 31 August – 5 September, 1992 Krynica, Poland, P. 150.

Cédola CV, Sánchez NE, Liljesthröm GG. 2001. Effect of tomato leaf hairiness on functional and numerical response of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 25(10-11): 819-831.

Everson P. 1979.The functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to various densities of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae). The Canadian Entomologist 111: 7-10.

Fantinou AA,  Baxevani A, Drizou F, Labropoulos P, Perdikis D, Papadoulis G. 2012. Consumption rate, functional response and preference of the predaceous mite Iphiseius degenerans to Tetranychus urticae and Eutetranychus orientalis. Experimental and Applied Acarology 58:133–144.

Fazlul HoqueMd, Wahedul Islam Md, Khalequzzaman M. 2010. Functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot to Tetranychus urticae Koch: Effects of prey life stages and temperature. University Journal of Zoology Rajshahi University 29: 1-8.

Ferla NJ, Marchetti M, Johann L, Haetinger C. 2011. Functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis under different Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) population density in laboratory. Zoologia 28(1): 17-22.

Gosh A, Chandra G. 2011. Functional response of Laccotrephes griseus (Hemiptera: Nepidae) against Culex qinquenfasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in laboratory bioassay. Journal of Vector Borne Disease 48: 72-77.

Hajizadeh J, Hosseini R, McMurtry JA. 2002. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) associated with eriophyid mites (Acari:  Phytoseiidae) in Guilan province of Iran. International Journal of Acarology 28(4): 373-377.

Hassanpour M, Mohaghegh J, Iranipour S, Nouri Ganbalani G, Enkeggard A. 2010. Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of prey and predator stages. Insect Science 18(2): 217-224.

Holling CS. 1959. Some characteristic of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist 91: 385-398.

Holling CS. 1961. Principles of insect predation. Annual Review of Entomology 6: 163-182.

Holling CS. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population. Memoires of the Entomological Society of Canada 48: 1-86.

Jalalizand A, Modaresi M, Tabeidian SA, Karimy A. 2011. Functional response of Orius nigerniger (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Effect of host plant morphological feature. International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology.May 7-9, 2011 Bangkok, Thailand. P. 92-96.

Jervis M, Kidd N. 1999. Insect Natural Enemies, Practical Approaches to Their Study and Evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London. 490pp.

Jones DB, Kristopher L, Giles KL, Elliott NC, Payton ME. 2007. Parasitism of greenbug, Schizaphis graminum, by the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes at winter temperatures. Environmental Entomology 36(1): 1-8.

Juliano SA. 1993. Non linear curve fitting: Predation and functional response curves. In: Scheinerand S, Gurevitch J. (eds.), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.Pp. 159-182.

Koveos DS, Broufas GD. 2000. Functional response of Euseius finlandicus and Amblyseius andersoni to Panonychus ulmi on apple and peach leaves in the laboratory. Experimental and Applied Acarology 24(4): 247-256.

Lester PJ, Yee JM, Yee S, Haywood J, Thistlewood HMA, Harmsen R. 2005. Does altering patch number and connectivity change the predatory functional response type experiments and simulations in an acarine predator–prey system? Canadian Journal of Zoology 83(6): 797–806.

Messina FJ, Hanks JB. 1998. Host plant alters the shape of the functional response of an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 1196-1202.

Metcalf RL, Luckman WH. 1994. Introduction to insect pest management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.3^rded.

Moezzipour M, Kafili M, Nooeei S, Allahyari H. 2008. Functional response of predatory mite, Phytoseilus plumifer (Canestrini & Fanzago) on different densities of Amphitetranychus viennensis (Zacher) and Tetranychus urticae (Koch). Agricultural Research, Water, Soil and Plant in Agriculture 8(3): 107-116.

Montoya P, Liedo P, Benrey B, Barrera JF, Cancino J, Aluja M. 2000. Functional response and superparasitism by Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93(1): 47-54.

Mori H, Chant DA. 1966. The influence of prey density, relative humidity and starvation on the predacious behavior of Phytoseilus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoolohy 44:483-491.

Mrosso F, Mwatawala M, Rwegasira G. 2013. Functional responses of Cheilomenes propingua, C. lunata and C. sulphurea (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to predation on Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) in eastern Tanzania. Journal of Entomology 10: 76-85.

Rasmya, AH, Abou-Elella GM, Osman MA. 2014. Functional response of the phytoseiid mite Typhlodromus negevi Swirski and Amitai to the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 47(11): 1327–1334.

Reay-Jones FPF, Rochat J, Goebel R, Tabone E. 2006. Functional response of Trichogramma chilonis  to Galleria mellonella  and  Chilo sacchariphagus eggs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 118: 229–236.

Reis PR, Sousa EO, Teodoro AV, Neto MP. 2003. Effect of prey density on the functional and numerical responses of two species of predaceous mites (Acari:  Phytoseiidae).  Neotropical Entomology 32(3): 461-467.

Ryoo MI. 1996. Influence of the spatial distribution pattern of prey among patches and spatial coincidence on the functional and numerical response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 120(3): 187-192.

SAS Institute Inc. 2011.SAS/ STAT user’s guide, Ver9.2. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Skirvin DJ, Fenlon JS. 2001.  Plant  species  modifies  the  functional  response  of Phytoseiulus persimilis  (Acari:  Phytoseiidae)  to Tetranychus urticae  (Acari:  Tetranychidae):  implications  for biological control. Bulletin of Entomological Research 91: 61-67.

Skirvin DJ, Fenlon JS. 2003. The effect of temperature on the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 31: 37-49.

Sepulveda F, Carrillo R. 2008. Functional response of the predatory mite Chileseius camposi (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on densities of its prey, Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 56(3): 1255-1260.

Solomon ME. 1949. The natural control of animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology 18: 1-35.

Xue Y, Meats A, Beattie GA, Spooner-Hart R, Herron GA. 2001. The influence of sublethal deposits of agricultural mineral oil on the functional and numerical responses of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to its prey, Tetranychusurticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology48(4): 291-302.

Zhang Y, Zhang ZQ, Ji J, Lin J. 1999. Predation of Ambleyseius longispinusus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Schizotetranychus nanygensis (Acari: Tetranychidae), a spider mite injurious to bamboo in Fulian, China. Systematic and Applied Acarology 4: 63-68.