Meta-Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension among Iranian EFL Learners of Varying Levels of Proficiency

Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice

مقاله 5، دوره 1، شماره 3، بهمن 2008، صفحه 91-108   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

نویسندگان

Sima Modirkhamene؛ Maryam Bahmani

University of Urmia

چکیده

This study explored the use of meta-cognitive strategies (MCS) in reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners with varying levels of proficiency (i.e. high proficient vs. low proficient). Furthermore, there was an attempt to investigate the impact of motivation on language learners’ MCS use. The proposed hypotheses predicted: 1) there is no significant difference between the high proficient EFL learners’ use of MCS compared to their low proficient peers, and 2) there is no relationship between the two groups’ MCS use and their motivation. One hundred participants, aged 16-24, were selected from the intermediate and advanced EFL learners in Jihad Daneshgahi Institute of Kermanshah. The data was collected through: a) a modified version of the FCE reading paper,  b) a modified version of the PET reading paper, c) Taraban's (2006) MCS Questionnaire,  and d) an adapted form of Gardner's (1985) motivation questionnaire, and was submitted to a series of independent samples t-test and co-relational analysis. The results indicated: 1) a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the use of meta-cognitive strategies, favoring the highly proficient readers, and 2) a significant relationship between the use of meta-cognitive strategies and motivation of the participants.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

High Proficient Readers؛ Low Proficient Readers؛ Meta-Cognitive Strategies؛ motivation؛ reading comprehension

اصل مقاله

 

 

مراجع

Al-Ansari, E.M. (2005). The dynamic interplay of students motivation and cognition in the college of education students at KuwaitUniversity. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 341-350.

Chamot, A. (1999). Children's learning strategy in immersion Classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-41.

Chen, I. Ju (2001). Language learning strategies used by high and low English proficiency students in a technology college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175-187.

Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: the role of attitude and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.

Gardner, R.C. & Lambert, W.E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning.Rowley, MA: Newberry House.

Goh, C & Kwah, P.F. (1997). Chinese ESL students' learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2. 1, 39-53.

 Green, J. M. & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly. 29(2),261-297.

Hoy, A.W. (2004). What do teachers know about self-efficacy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Mc Namara, D.S., & o'Reilly, T. (2007). Theories of comprehension skill: language and strategies versus capacity and suppression.Houppauge, NY: Nova Science.

Monos, K. (2003). Learner strategies of Hungarian secondary grammar school students.Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.

Mullins, P. (1992). Successful English language learning strategies of students enrolled in the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkron University, Bangkok, Thailand.  Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University, San Diego, CA.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, M.A.: Newbury House.

Oxford, R.L. (1991). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know.New York: New berry House Publishers.

Oxford, R.L. (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: cross cultural perspectives.Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

O' Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U, (1990).  Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Pintritch, P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.

Qashoa, H. (2006). Motivation amond learners of English in the secondaryu schools in the Eastern Coast of UAE. BritishUniversity in Dubai: Institute of Education.

Rigney, J.W. (1978). Learning strategies: a theoretical perspective. In H.F.O' Neil (Ed.), learning strategies.( 148-161)  New York: Academic Press.

Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, meta-cognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix,36-54

Taraban, R. (2006). Giving students time for academic resources that work. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 205-210.

Valle, A.  (2003). Cognitive, motivational, and volitional dimensions of learning. Research in Higher Education, 44, 557-580.

Wenden, A.L. (1987a). Learner strategies for learner autonomy.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Wenden, A.L. (1987b). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Williams, M. & Burden, R.L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach.Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.