A Critical Study of Selected Political Elites' Discourse in English

Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice

مقاله 2، دوره 1، Inaugural Issue، اردیبهشت 2008، صفحه 14-33   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

نویسندگان

Biook Behnam¹؛ Laleh Moghtadi²

¹Azerbaijan University of Tarbiat-Moallem, Tabriz

²Iran Language Institute, Tabriz

چکیده

This study explored how political elites can contribute to power enactment through using language. It started with a theoretical overview of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and then presented a corpus consisting of speeches of eight political elites, namely, Malcolm X, Noam Chomsky, Martin Luther King, Josef Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, Winston Churchill, J.F. Kennedy and Adolph Hitler. This study analyzed speeches in terms of figures of' speech, and interpreted them from the point of view of CDA using the framework introduced by Fairclough (1989) as a three-dimensional approach to the study of discourse (Description, Interpretation, Explanation) and van Dijk (2004) as the theory of critical context analysis.. Speech figures are classified in this study into six main categories as Comparison, Grammar, Meaning, Parenthesis, Repetition and Rhetoric. The result of analyses reveals that while there are differences in the type and degree of speech figures employed by our selected individual political elites, there is one striking pattern which is common among all speeches: the frequent use of figures of Grammar, Repetition and Rhetoric
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)؛ Figures of Speech؛ political elites؛ Power؛ Ideology؛ Discourse

مراجع

Cronick, K., 2002, The discourse of president George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden: A rhetorical analysis and hermeneutic interpretation. Retrieved September 3, 2003, from http://www qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm

Brown, R. and Gillamn, A. (1976). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In P.P. Giglioli (Ed.) Language and social context: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Fairclough, N., (1989). Language and power.New York: Longman.

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T., (1979) (Eds.). Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Harris, R. A., 2004, A handbook of rhetorical devices. Retrieved April 6, 2005, from http://www.vitualalt.com

 

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E., (2001, 2003). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: BasilBlackwell.

Sutcliffe, R., (2004), Figure of speech dictionary. Retrieved.November 15, 2004, from

http://www.opundo.com/ figures.php?

Thomas, L. & Wareing, Sh., (1999). Language, society and power: An introduction.London and New York: Routledge.

Trew, T. (1979). What the papers say: linguistic variation and ideological differences. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew (1979) (Eds.). Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

van Dijk, T.A., (2001), Political discourse and ideology. Retrieved April 29, 2001, from http://www.discourse-in-society.org

van Dijk, T.A., (2004), Ideology and Discourse Analysis. Retrieved September 10, 2004, from

http://www.discourse-in-society.org

van Dijk, T.A., (2004). Politics, ideology and discourse. Retrieved from the Web June 15, 2004 from

http://www.discourse-in-society.org

van Dijk, T.A., (2005), Elite discourse and institutional racism. Retrieved March 29, 2005, from

     http://www.discourse-in-society.org

Widdowson, H. G., (2004), Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis.Oxford: BasilBlackwell.

Wilson, J., (2001, 2003), Political discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton, (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 398-415).Oxford: BasilBlackwell.