تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 10,005 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,623 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,416,342 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 55,444,899 |
Evaluation of Error Due to Applying Average Rating Curve as downstream Boundary Condition in Unsteady Flow Modeling | ||
Journal of Water Science & Engineering | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 4، شهریور 2012، صفحه 7-18 اصل مقاله (222.69 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mehdi Habibzadeh* ؛ H Mohammad Vali Samani؛ H Kashkuli | ||
Department of Hydraulic Structures, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khouzestan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
The rating curve is the relationship between the water stage and the associated discharge in a given section of a channel. In steady flow, this relationship usually has exponential type, whereas in unsteady it flow has a looped shape. Since direct developing of actual looped rating curve by using hydrometric methods is merely possible, steady-state rating curve is commonly used as a downstream boundary condition in mathematical modeling of unsteady flow which leads to relevant error in model results. In this study, in order to evaluate this error, a method is presented by using the HEC-RAS model of unsteady flow in a prismatic channel with different bed slopes, roughness coefficients and channel lengths as effective parameters. In various channel geometries , the rating curves of both the approximate and the reference states are obtained. Then statistical comparison between the results was done. Accordingly, 120 R-squared (R2) values refer to 240 different channel conditions, were considered and the errors were analyzed which indicate that the error is declined by increasing bed slope and channel length, in addition by roughness reduction. The maximum rate of the error occurred by any of effective parameters including bed slope, roughness coefficient and channel length was evaluated in order of appearance; 0.2617, 0.1507 and 0.1673. In addition, the sensitivity of all the parameters in different modeling conditions may be distinguished by using the obtained graphs. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Rating Curve؛ Unsteady Flow؛ Mathematical Modeling؛ Downstream Boundary Condition؛ HECRAS | ||
مراجع | ||
امیرجانی، ر.( 1386). بررسی اثرات آب برگشتی در رودخانههای سه شاخه ای به منظور اصلاح و تعیین دبی - اشل در ایستگاههای هیدرومتری. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه سازههای آبی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات خوزستان.ص78-82. مغربی، م. ف و حیدر بیگی، ع، الف. (1388). بررسی تحلیلی روابط دبی ـ اشل در کانالهای مرکب با زبریهای غیر یکنواخت. نشریه مهندسی عمران دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، سال بیست و یکم، شماره یک.ص23-27. نجمایی، م. )1369). هیدرولوژی مهندسی. چاپ دوم. انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.تهران.ص45-76. Baldassarre, Di. and Montanari, G. A. (2009). Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, pp: 39–61. Chow, V. T. (1958). Open Channel Hydraulics, Mc Graw Hill, Tokio, Japan, pp680 Domeneghetti, A., Castellarin, A. and Brath, A. (2010). Effects of Rating-Curve Uncertainty on The Calibration of Numerical Hydraulic Models, First IAHR European Congress, Edinburgo, Maggio, May pp: 4-6. Dottori, F. and Martina, M. L. V. and Todini, E. (2009). A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, pp :859–896.
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open channel flow. New York, USA: Macmilliam Series in Civil Engineering, Macmilliam eds.,pp 522.
Horritt, M. S. and Bates, P. D. )2002(. Evaluation of 1-D and 2-D models for predicting river flood inundation. J. Hydrol., 268, pp: 87–99.
Jones, B. E. (1915). A method of correcting river discharge for a changing stage, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper, 375-E, pp: 117– 130.
Shrestha, R. R. and Simonovic, S. P. (2009). A Fuzzy Set Theory Based Methodology for Analysis of Uncertainties in Stage-Discharge Measurements and Rating Curve. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 247 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 110 |