The Relationship between Every-other Furrow Irrigation and Foliar Application of Zinc on Physiological Indices in Two Sweet Corn Genotypes

Journal of Crop Nutrition Science

مقاله 4، دوره 1، Issue 3-4، اسفند 2015، صفحه 28-39   

نویسندگان

Babak Peykarestan¹؛ Mehrdad Yarnia^{* 1}؛ Hamid Madani²؛ Vahram Rashidi¹؛ Hossin Heidari Sharif Abad³

¹Department of Agronomy, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

²Department of Agronomy, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

³Department of Agronomy, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

To assessment growth physiological charachteristics of two hybrids of sweet corn affected different irrigation pattern and zinc fertilization, a research was conducted as split plot factorial experiment based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications. Main factor included different levels of irrigation pattern included conventional furrow irrigation, fixed every other furrow irrigation and alternate every other furrow irrigation, also different levels of foliar application of zinc as lack of foliar application of zinc, use of Drop zinc sulfate (0.002 lit.ha^-1), use of Fast zinc sulfate (0.002 lit.ha^-1) and two hybrids of sweet and super sweet corn belonged to sub plots. The result of analysis of variance indicated the effect of irrigation pattern, foliar application of zinc, different genotypes and interaction effect of the treatments on all measured traits were significant at 1% probability level. Dual interaction effect showed maximum rate of all physiological indices belonged to I₃Zn₃ (Alternate every other furrow irrigation, fast zinc spray), I₃V₂ (Alternate every other furrow irrigation, Challenger genotype), Zn₃V₂ (Fast zinc spray, Challenger genotype). According result of triple interaction effect maximum rate of physiological indices such as leaf area index (4.227), crop growth rate (3.186 gr.m^-2.GDD), relative growth rate (0.189 gr.gr^-1.GDD), net assimilation rate (1.73 gr.m^-2.GDD), harvest index (53.03), chlorophyll a (0.299 gr.gr^-1 FW), chlorophyll b (0.491 gr.gr^-1 FW) and carotenoid (0.997 gr.gr^-1 FW) belonged to I₃Zn₃V₂ (Alternate every other furrow irrigation, fast zinc spray, Challenger genotype). Finally use alternate every other furrow irrigation to conserve water along with foliar application of zinc (particularly zinc sulfate with fast zinc) led to stable physiological indices in stress conditions and it can be proposed to the farmers in markazi province at central of Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Chlorophyll؛ growth curve؛ Irrigation؛ Micro elements

مراجع

Ahmadi, J., H. Zieinal, M. A. Rostami. and R. Chogun. 2013. Study of drought resistance in commercially late maturing dent corn hybrids. Iranian Journal of AgriculturalScience.31: 891-907. (Abstract in English)

Aghayari, F., F. Khalili. and M. R. Ardakani. 2016. Effect of deficit irrigation, partial irrigation and superabsorbent polymer on yield and yield components of corn (K.S.C.703). Journal of Soil and Water Soil Resource Conservation. 6(1): 1-14. (Abstract in English)

Alizadeh, O., E. Majedi, H. A. Nadian, Gh. Nourmohammadi. and M. R. Amerian. 2007. Effect of water stress and different nitrogen rates on phenology, growth and development of corn. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.14: 116-12. (Abstract in English)

Ashraf, M. 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnology Advances. 27: 84-93.

Babaeian, M., M. Heidari. and A. Ghanbari. 2010. Effect of water stress and foliar micronutrient application on physiological characterstics and nutrient uptake in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12(4): 311-391. (Abstract in English)

Barker, D. M., S. R. Raine. and M. J. Robertson. 1997. A Preliminary investigation of alternate furrow irrigation for sugar cane production. Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Tech. 20: 302-309.

Baybordi, A. 2006. Effect of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu on the quality and quantity of wheat under salinity stress. J. Water and Soil Sci. 17: 140-150.

Benjamin, D. S. and J. T. Ritchie. 2007. Short and long-term responses of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit. Agronomy Journal. 84: 107-113.

Earl, H. J. and R. F. Davis. 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation, use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal.95: 688-696.

Friedrik, R. 2012. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research.89: 1-16.

Ghatavi, R. F., B. C. Jackson, J. R. Kiniry. and G. F. Arkin. 2012. Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal.81: 61-65.

Graterol, Y. E., D. E. Eisenhauer. and R. W. Elmore. 1993. Alternate-furrow irrigation for soybean production. Agric. Water Manage. J. 24: 133-145.

Kaman, H., C. Kirda. and S. Sesveren. 2011. Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management.98: 801-807.

Kang, S., Z. Liang, Y. Pan, P. Shi. and J. Zhang. 2000. Alternate furrow irrigation for maize production in an arid area. Agric. Water Manage. J. 45: 267-274.

Karam, F. R., D. R. Lahoud. and R. Y. Masaad. 2007. Evaporation, seed yield and water use efficiency of drip irrigated sunflower under full and deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 90(3): 213- 235.

Khayatnezhad, M. and R. Gholamin. 2012. The effect of drought stress on leaf chlorophyll content and stress resistance in maize cultivars (Zea mays L.). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 6(12): 2844-2848.

Layer, E. J. and M. O. Clegg. 2003. Using corn maturity to maintain grain yield in the presence of late season drought. Journal of Production Agriculture.12: 400-405.

Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology. 148: 350- 382.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1.

Loongenecker, S. R., J. Jones. and R. K. Crookston. 2009. Effect of water deficit during grain filling on the pattern of maize kernel growth and development. Crop Science27: 726-730.

Mailhol, J. C., P. Ruelle. and I. Nemeth. 2001. Impact of fertilisation practices on nitrogen leaching under irrigation. Irrigation Science Journal. 20: 139-147.

Majidian, M. and H. Ghadiri. 2002. Effect of water stress and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer during different growth stages on grain yield, yield components, water use efficiency and some physiological characteristics of corn (Zea mays L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science33: 521-533. (Abstract in English)

Moison, M. A. 2006. Drought responses of tropical corn. Leaf area and yield components in field. Maydica.35: 221-226.

Nasri, M., M. Khalatbari. and H. Aliabadi Farahani. 2010. The effect of alternate furrow irrigation under different nutritional element supplies on some agronomic traits and seed qualitative parameters in corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds. 1(2): 17-23.

Parasad, R. and J. F. Power. 2002. Soil fertility for sustainable agriculture .CRC Press LTC, Australia. 110 pp.

Payero, J. O., D. D.Tarkalson, S. Irmak, D. Davison. and J. L. Petersen. 2009. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management.96: 1387-1397.

Popova, Z., I. Varlev, V. Kutev. and E. Ikonomova. 1998. Irrigation and cropping techniques to prevent natural water pollution. Papers of the 1^st Inter-Regional Conference “Environment-Water: Innovative Issues in Irrigation and Drainage, Lisbon. Portugal. Pp: 6-13.

Rafiee, M. 2012. Effect of every other furrow irrigation and planting density on physiological traits in corn (Zea mays L.). World Applied Sciences Journal. 17(2): 189-193.

Rafie, M., P. Jaafari. and H. Mollahosseini. 2003. The effects of drought stress and plant density on yield and some agronomic traits of maize (SC. 301). Journal of Research in Agricultural Science.2: 13-24. (Abstract in English)

Rahnama, S. R., M. Parsa, A. Nezami. and A. Ganjeali. 2006. The effects of drought stress at different phenological stages on growth indices of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 1(2): 69-80. (Abstract in English)

Rakers, J. 2013. Physiological bases for yield differences in selected maize cultivars from Central America. Field Crops Research.42: 69-80.

Reynold, P. and M. E. Westgate. 2014. Water deficit affects receptivity of maize silks. Crop Science.33: 278-182.

Sanders, O. T. R. and M. Shaw. 2014. Temperature and soil water effects on maize growth, development, yield and forage quality.Crop Science.36: 341-348.

Scot, P. and A. Aboudrare. 2009. Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environment. Europeanm Journal of Agronomy.21: 433-446.

Sepaskhah, A. R. and M. H. Khajehabdollahi. 2005. Alternate furrow irrigation with different irrigation intervals for maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 8: 592-600.

Simic, M., J. Srdic, Z. Videnovic, Z. Dolijanovic, A. Uludag. and D. Kovacevic. 2012. Sweet maize (Zea mays L. saccharata) weeds infestation, yield and yield quality affected by different crop densities. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 18(5): 668-674. In: Konstantinov, K. and V. Andelkovic. 2007. Science as sustainable development. Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”. Belgrade, Serbia. pp: 25-43.

Shao, H. B., L. Y. Chu, C. Abdul-Jaleel. and C. X. Zhao. 2008. Water-deficit stressinduced anatomical changes in higher plants. C. R. Biol. 331: 215-225.

Soleymanifard, A., S. S. Pourdad, R. Naseri. and A. Mirzaei. 2011. Effect of planting patternon honological characteristics and growth indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13(2): 282-298. (Abstract in English)

Song, F.B. and J. Y. Dia. 2000. Effect of drought stress on growth and development of female inflorescence and yield of maize. Journal of Jillian Agriculyure University. 22(1): 17-22.

Soriano M. A., F. Orgaz, F. J. Villalobos. and E. Fereres. 2004. Efficiency of water use of early plantings of sunflower. Eur. J. Agron. 21: 465–476.

Stone, J. F. and D. L. Nofziger. 1993. Water use and yields of cotton grown under wide-spaced furrow irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 24: 27-38.

William, J. R. and M. E. Westgate. 2007. Maize kernel set at low water potential.I: Sensitivity to reduce assimilates during early kernel growth. Crop Science.31: 1189-1195.

Wilson, D. R., P. G. Ston. and R. N. Gillespie. 2006. Drought effects on water use, growth and yield sweet corn .Proceedings of the 9^th Australian Agronomy Conference. 45-48 pp.

Yazdani, F., I. Allahdadi, G. A. Akbari. and M. R. Behbahani. 2007. Impact of super absorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.), under drought stress condition. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 10(23): 4190-4196.

Yonts, C. D., D. E, Eisenhauer. and D. Varner. 2007. Managing furrow irrigation systems. Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska. Research Report. 45 pp.

Zivcak, M., M. Brestic. and H. M. Kalaji. 2014. Photosynthetic responses of sun- and shade-grown barley leaves to high light: is the lower PSII connectivity in shade leaves associated with protection against excess of light? Photosynth Res. J. 119: 339–354.

Doi: 10.1007/s11120-014-9969-8.