The Role of Constructive Elements of Iran's Identity in Relations between Iran and Russia

International Journal of Political Science

مقاله 1، دوره 4، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 8، اسفند 2014، صفحه 1-11   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Yosef shahmohammadi^* ؛ Fatemeh Hashemi

چکیده

Along the history, relations between Iran and Russia always faced with great changes and transitions and always, the foundation of these relations have been on the base of political, security and military and sometimes economical affairs. Iran and its people have special identity elements like: Persian language, Shiite Islamism, nationalism, regional hegemonies, anti-foreignism and etc, that some of them like: Shiite Islamism and anti-foreignism after Islamic Republic of Iran are reinforced and had deep impressions on foreign relations of Iran and Russia. In this survey, we are going to answer this question that, according to constructive elements of Islamic Republic of Iran's identity, how was relation between Iran and Russia?
To answer this question, through the explanatory method with general descriptive, constructive elements of Islamic republic of Iran identity recognized and its effects studied on relations between Iran and Russia after Islamic republic of Iran. Results of the survey show that according to constructivism, relations between Iran and Russia include different paradigms of cultural co operations and common point of views and will be able to affect and transmit from cultural field to political and foreign relations of two neighbor countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Foreign relation؛ Islamic Republic of Iran؛ Russia؛ Identity؛ Constructive elements

مراجع

References

Alexandrove Maxim. (2003), the Concept of State Identity in International Relations: A Theoretical Analysis, Journal of International Development and Cooperation, Vol.10, No.1, 2003, pp. 33–46

Berger, T. U. (1998), Norms, Identity and National Security in Germany and Japan, P. J.

 

DehghaniFiroozabadi, S. J. (2007), Identity and benefit in Islamic Republic of Iran's foreign policy, Tehran: The Research Institute for Strategic Studies. (in Persian).

DehqaniFiroozabadi, S. J., &Wahabpour, P. (2012).Ontological security in foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.The Research Institute for Strategic Studies. (in Persian).

Fearon, J., & Wendt, A. (2005). Rationalism and Constructivism: a Skeptical View. In Handbook or International Relations, London: Sage Publication.

Hopf, T. (1998).The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory, International Security, 23(1).http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171.

Jansiz Ahmad &FasihiMoghaddamLakaniSamereh. (2015), The Role of Culture and identity in Relations Between Iran and the United States of America, Political Science, Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education, Asian Culture and History; Vol. 7, No. 2

JavadiArjman, Mohammad Jafar. (2009), Identity and Iran's foreign policy indicators, Policy, Vol. 40, No. 1.

Katzenstein, P. (1998). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Japan. New York: Cornell University Press.

Kubalkova, V. (2001). Foreign Policy in Constructed International Policy Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Lapid, Y. (2001). Introduction in Identities, Borders and Others: Rethinking in International Relations Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

Mansbach, R. W. (2002). Deterritorializing Global Politics. In Vision of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field. Columbia: Columbia University of Press.

Mohammad Nia, Mahdi. (2011),A Holistic Constructivist Approach to Iran'sForeign Policy, International Journalof Business and Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 4.

Moshirzadeh, H. (2011). A Breakthrough in the Theories of International Relations.Samt Publications. (in Persian).

Najafi, Moosa. (2005),Spiritual arena of Iranians national Identity, Qoam, Maaref publications, p23.

Parker, John W. (2008), Persian Dreams, Washington. D.C .Potomac Books.

Pouliot, V. (2007). Subjectivism: Toward a Constructivist Methodology. International Studies,

 57.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00455.x.

Seyed Ali, Khamene’i (2013), “The Front of Resistance to the Islamic Regime Is Focusing on Preventing Iran from Gaining Scientific Strength,” The Supreme Leader’s website, October 9, 2013,

http://www.leader.ir/langs/fa/index.php?p=contentShow&id=11166.

             

   

   

11

   

   

Shestakov, Yevgeni. (2014), (interview with Sergey Kartaganov), “American Policy Targets a Regime Change in
Russia,” RossiyskayaGazeta, March 24, 2014,

 

http://www.rg.ru/2014/04/23/karaganov-site.html.

ShooriMahmood. (2011), Iran & Russia: From Balance of Power to Identity Analysis, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 2, Summer 2011, pp. 105-125.

Smith, S. (2001). Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches in International Theory.Wiley.

Trenin, Dimitri. (2007), "Russia's Threat Perception and Strategic Posture," in TreninDimitri and Craig Nation R. (eds.), Russian Security Strategy under Putin: U.S. and Russian Perspectives, Strategic Studies Institute, (November).

Wendt, A. (1994), Collective identity formation and the international state, American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384-396.

Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183.