The Effect of CALL on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Attitude towards the Use of Technology

Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies

مقاله 3، دوره 1، شماره 3، اردیبهشت 2013، صفحه 39-56   

نویسنده

Maryam Rahmani^*

Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch

چکیده

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CALL in developing reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners in comparison to paper-based instruction and to investigate any significant difference in the reading comprehension of the high and low proficient learners after receiving computer-assisted instruction (CAI). This study also investigated the participants’ attitudes toward Information Technology before and after the instruction in the experimental groups and examined the differences between the high and low proficient learners’ attitudes toward Information Technology. The 40 female participants of the study, who were 20 high and 20 low proficient learners were randomly divided into four groups, two experimental groups and two comparison groups. The findings of the study indicated that there was a significant difference in the reading comprehension of the learners who received CAI in comparison to those learners who received paper-based instruction. Furthermore; there was a significant difference in the reading comprehension of the high and low proficient learners who received CAI. The results also showed that while the high proficient learners developed a more positive attitude toward Information Technology after instruction, the low proficient learners’ attitude did not change significantly.
 

مراجع

Aldelson, J.C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem? In J.C. Alderson &. A.H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1-27, 122-135). New York: Longman.

Alipanahi, F. (2001). The Internet and EFL Reading Comprehension. Doctoral dissertation. Allameh-Tabatabaa'I University.

Al-Seghayer, K. (2003). The impact of the presence or absence of organizational devices on the construction of a coherent mental representation of hypertext content by intermediate ESL readers. UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (UMI No. 3097635).

Altun, A. (2000).         Patterns in cognitive processes and strategies in hypertext reading: A case study of two experienced computer users. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(I), 35-55.

Alverman, D.E. (2001). Effective literacy instruction for Adolescents. Executive summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

Anderson R.C., & Pearson, D.P. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. David Pearson, R. Dart, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal (Eds.),Handbook of Reading Research, Vol 1 (pp255-292).N.Y.:Longman.

Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 303-3t8.

Atkinson, R., Hansen, D. (1966). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford Project. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-26.

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12, 59-68.

Bernhardt, E.B. (1986). Reading in a foreign language. In B.H. Wing (Ed.), Listening, Reading and Writing: Analysis and Application. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference.

Brierley B. & Kemble I. (1991) Computers as a tool in language teaching, New York: Ellis Horwood.

Burns, A. (2004). Teaching English from a global perspective: What are the implications in SE Asia. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching. 12-14. English Teachers’ Association. Taipei, Taiwan.

Carrell, P.L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 461-481.

Carrell, P.L„ Devine, 7. & Eskey, D.E. (eds) (1998). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. NY, Cambridge University Press.

Chappelle, C.A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and Research. London: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Chatel, R. G. (2002). New technology, new literacy: Creating a bridge for English language learners. The New England Reading Association Journal, 38(3), 45-49.

Chen, Y., & Huang, C. (2001). Incorporating English CD-ROM use for technology college students. Selective Papers from the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching and Learning, 324-334.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge:TheMIT Press.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning and Technology, l (1), 60-81.  Retrieved on August 5, 2008 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chun_plass/default.html.

Clarke, M. A. (1980) The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading¾or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209.

Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman & R. Jordan (Eds.), (pp. 5-12). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Coley, A. (1997). Technology's impact. September 1997. Online Electronic School. Available from http://www.electronic-school.com/0997f3.html

Cotton, K. (1992). Computer-assisted instruction. Northwest Regional Educational Labratory. Available from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/5/cul0.html

Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning. London: Routledge.

Culver, S.J. (1991). Early Cambrian Foraminifera from West Africa. Science 254: 689-691.

Dee-Lucas, D, & Larkin, J. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction,13(3), 431-468.

Dehlin, J. (2004). Reading comprehension: Finding a match between reader and text. Jill Dehlin's Web Portfolio. Retrieved from http://www.msu.edu/dehlinji/946paper.html

Egbert, J. (2002). A project for everyone: English language learners and technology in content-area classrooms. Learning and Learning with Technology, 29(8), 36-41.

Eskey, D. (1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 93-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fletcher, & R. C. Atkinson. (1972) Cost and performance of computer-assisted instruction for education of disadvantaged children. In J. Froomkin, D. T. Jamison, & R. Radner (Eds.), Education As an Industry. Cambridge, MA: NBER, Ballinger, 201-240.

Gordon, B. (2001). Making digital type look good. London: Thames & Hudson.

Gulley, P.K., (2003). Pros and cons of computer technology in the classroom. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://edweb.fdu.edu/anyfile/MeyerM/article.doc.

Gunduz, N. (2005). Computer Assisted Language Learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193-213. Retrieved November 12, 2008 from http://www.jlls.org/Issues/Volume1/No.2/nazligunduz.pdf

Hailey, D.E., Jr., & Hailey, C. (1998). Hypermedia, multimedia, and reader cognition: An empirical study.  Technical Communication, 45(3), 330-342.

Hamidi, E. (2004). The Impact of Internet on the Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Students. MA thesis. University of Al-Zahra.

Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1981). Research Design & Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Tehran: Rahnama Publications. 

Hedayati, F. (2005). Comparing a Web-Based and-Paper-Based Test of Reading SkillS. MA thesis. University of Al-Zahra.

Heppner, F. H., Anderson, J. G. T., Farstrup, A.E., & Weiderman, N. H. (1985). Reading performance on a standardized test is better from print than from computer display. Journal of Reading, 321-325.

Johnson, K. & Johnson, H. (1999). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching. London: Blackwell Publishers.

Kellogg, G. (1999). Students' reactions to reading electronic vs. printed documents. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Language and Develop­ment. Retrieved on July 14 2008 from http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/hanoi_proceedings/kellogg.htm

Kern, A., &Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of networked-­based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network -based language teaching (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1992). Motivational and achievement effects of learner control over content review within CAI. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(1), 101–114.

Knezek, G. , Christensen, R., Gilmore, E., Kim, H., Morales, C., Voogt, J. & Moonen, B. (1999). Teacher & Student Attitudes Toward Information Technology in Four Nations. Panel presented at Society of Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE)'s 10th International Conference, San Antonio, TX.

Knezek, G. and Christensen, R. (1998). Validating the Teachers' Attitudes Toward Information Technology Questionnaire. Presentation to the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education 9th International Conference, Washington, DC.

Kol, S., & Scbcolnik, M. (2000). Enhancing screen reading strategies. Calico Journal, 18(l), 67-80.

Kol, S., & Schcolnik, M. (1997). Reading from screen vs. reading from paper: A pilot study. CAELLJournal, 8(l), 10-14.

Kosakowski J. (1998). The benefits of information technology. ERIC Digests. Retrieved on July 11, 2008 from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/files/techbenefits.html

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Torrance, CA: Laredo Publishing.

Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19-26.

Kulik, J.A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E.L. Baker and H.F. O'Neil, Jr. (Eds.). Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C-L.C., Cohen, P.A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A metaanalysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 525-544.

Leisibach, T.B. (2002). I-CALL and second language acquisition (SLA). Retrieved on July 3, 2008 from http://www.unibas.ch/LIlab/staff/tenhacken/Applied-CL/ICALL&SLA.pdf

Leu, D. J., Jr., Gallo, M. J., & Hillinger, M. J. (1995). Reading comprehension in hypermedia environments: Reconsidering considerate text in dynamic electronic environ­ments. Cited in Leu, D. J., Jr. & Reinking, D. (1996), Bringing insights from reading research to research on electronic learning environments.

Levine, A., Frerenz, O. and Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL- EJ, 4.1-9.Retrieved on March 28, 2007 from http://tesl-ej.org/ej16/a1.html

Liu. M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee. S. (2003). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(3), 250-273.

Lowe, J. & Holton, E. (2005). A Theory of Effective Computer-Based Instruction for Adults. Human Resource Development Review, 4(2), 159-188.

Lungberg, I. (1995). The computer as a tool for remediation in the education of students with reading disabilities: A theory based approach. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 89–100.

Lynch, L. Fawcett, AJ. and Nicolson, RI. (2000). Computer-assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: an evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31 (4).

Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K., & Allor, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research  Journal, 38, 371–410.

McDonell, T. B. (2003). The Effects of Text Presentation: Linear and Hypertext on English Language Learners. ITFORUM. [ON-LINE]. Available:http:/it.coe.uga.edu/itforum.

Mokhtarnia, S. (2007). An Investigation of Metacognitive Awareness of Hypertext Reading Strategies of Iranian EFL learners. MA thesis. University of Al- Zahra.

Muter, P. (1996). Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In H. van Oostendorp & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text process­ing (Vol. LVIII, pp. 161-180). Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Muter, P., & Maurutto, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited? Behaviour and Information Technology, 10(4), 257-266.

National Capital Language Resource Center, (2004). The Essentials of Language Teaching. Retrieved on August 2, 2008 from http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/reading/reindex.htm

Paran, A. (1997). Bottom-up and top-down processing. English Teaching Professional. Retrieved on June 9, 2008, from http://www.reading.ac.uk/AcaDepts/cl/slals/buptdown.htm

Pfaffenberger, B. (1999). Webster's New World Dictionary of Computer Terms (7th edition), New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

Phillips, D. (1995). Longman preparation course for the  test: Practice Tests. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Phillips, D. (1996). Longman preparation course for the  test: Practice Tests. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. .

Phillips, D. (1998). Longman preparation course for the  test: Practice Tests. USA: Peterson Longman.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman preparation course for the  test: Practice Tests. USA: Peterson Longman.

Preisinger, R., Sargeant, K., & Weibel, K. (1988). An Evaluation of Reading Software  according to schema theory. (Eric Document Reproduction Services No. ED    298761)

Rasmussen, K., & Davidson, G.V. (1996). Dimensions of learning styles and their influence on performance in hypermedia lessons. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, USA, 800.

Ravichandran, T. & phil, M. (2000). Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) in the Perspective of Interactive Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages.Available from: http://members.rediff.com/eximsankar/call.htm

Reinking,D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-­typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Renshaw, C. E., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). The educational effectiveness of computer-based instruction. Computers and Geosciences 26: 677-682.

Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and Performance V1 (pp. 573-603). Hilldale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Schcolnik, M. & Kol, S. (2006). Reading and Learning from Screen. In P. Zaphiris & G. Zacharia (Eds.) User-Centered Computer Aided Language Learning, 257-277. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing.

Semail, L., & Pailliotet, A.W. (1999). lnrermediality. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Soe, K., Koki, S., & Chang, J.M. (2000). Effect of computer-assisted instruction on reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443079)

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Huang, J. S. (2007). Reading Comprehension and Use of Strategies through Computer-Based Strategy Training. Computers in Human Behavior, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.009.

Thurstun, J. (2000). Screenreading: Challenges of the new literacy. In D. Gibbs & K.L. Krause (Eds.), Cyberlines: Languages and cultures of the Internet (pp. 61-78). Albert Park: James Nicholas Publishers.

Underwood, J., & Brown, J. (1997). Integrated learning systems: Potential into practice. Oxford, UK:Heinemann/NCET.

Urquhar, S., & Weir, C. (1998). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longham.

Vernadakis, N., Avgerinos, A., Tsitskari, E., and Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The use of computer assisted instruction in preschool education: Making teaching meaningful. Early Childhood Education 33(2), 99-104

Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. 1996. Retrieved on August 1 from http://www.gse.uci.edu/person/markw/call.html

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.                             Retrieved July 1, 2008 from http://www.gse.uci.edu/person/markw/overview.html

Wehrle, R. (1998). Computers in education: The pros and the cons. Retrieved on November 18, 2003 from http://edweb.fdu.edu/anyfile/MeyerM/article.doc.

Willetts, K. (1992). Technology and second language learning. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Production Service No. ED350883)

Williams, H. S., & Williams, P. N. (2000). Integrating reading and computer: An approach to improve ESL students reading skills. Reading improvement, 37(3), 98-101.

Wilson, R., & Landoni, M. (2002). Electronic textbook design guidelines. JISC Project. Retrieved on July 18 2008, from http://ebooks.strath.ac.uk/eboni/guidelines/Guidelines.pdf

Worthington, E. L. Jr., Welsh, J. A., Archer, C. R., Mindes, E. J., & Forsyth, D. R. (1996). Computer-Assisted Instruction as a supplement to lectures in an introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 175-181.

Zabrucky, K.M., & Moore, D. (1999). Influences of text genie on adults' monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25, 691-710.