The comprehension of Relative Clauses within Movement-based hypothesis in L1 and L2: the Case of Tati and English

Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies

مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 2، بهمن 2013، صفحه 68-89   

نویسنده

Somayyeh Rahmani^*

Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch

مراجع

Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T. (2005). Processing grammatical features by Italian children. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development.

Arosio, F., Guasti, M. T., & Stucchi, N. A. (2010). Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40, 137- 154. doi: 10.1007/S10936-010-9160-0.

Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Cognitive psychology and cognitive science. In A. D. Baddeley, & A. O. Bernsen (Eds.), Research Directions in Cognitive Science: A European Perspective, Vol. 1 Cognitive Psychology, (pp. 1-8). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Betancort, M., Carreiras, M., & Sturt, P. (2009). The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: an eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental psychology. doi: 10.1080/17470210902866672.

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York:Wiley.

Bowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex structures. In P. Fletcher & M.

             Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language     development, (pp. 285-306).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brandt, S., Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The acquisition of German relative clause: A case study. Child Language, 35, 325-348. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008379.

Diessel, H. (2009). On the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of subject and non-subject relative clauses. In Talmy Givón and Masayoshi Shibatani (Eds.), Syntactic Complexity, (pp. 251-276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive linguistics, 11, 131-151.

Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 1–25.

Demberg, V. & Keller, F. (2008). Data from eye tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109(2), 193–210.

De Villiers, J. G., Flusberg, H. B. T., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499-518.

Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9, 1-20.

Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). A resource-based account of animacy effects in the processing of relative clauses. Poster presented at the 20th CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing. San Diego, CA.

Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2006). The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language 54, 541-553.

Fedorenko, E., Pitantadosi, S., & Gibson, E. (2012). Processing Relative Clauses in Supportive Contexts. Cognitive Science 36(3), 471–497.

Flanigan, B, O. (1995). Anaphora and relativization in child second language acquisition. SSLA, 17, 331-351.

Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversion. Language, 66(2), 297-316.

Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1980). Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 328-337.

Marcus, M. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Mak, W. M., Vonk, M., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 50–68. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2837.

Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2006). Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466-490. Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.

McKee, C., & McDaniel, D. (2001). Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 9, 113–156.

Mellow, D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27, 620–644.

Mendikoetna, A. (1989). Processing relative clauses in Basque and Spanish. York paper in linguistics 14, 229-261.

Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control, 7, 292-303.

O’Grady, W. (1977).Syntactic Development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

O’Grady, W. (2011). Relative clauses: Processing and acquisition. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: processing, typology, and function (PP.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2003). A subject–object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 433–448.

O’Grady, W., Yamashita, Y., Lee, S. Y., Choo, M., & Cho, S. (2000). Computational factors in the acquisition of relative clauses. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Development of the Mind, Tokyo.

Ozcan, F. H. (1997). Comprehension of relative clauses in the acquisition of Turkish. In K. Dmer, & E. Uzun (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Turkish linguistics, 149-155, Ankara.

Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 169–196.