EFL learners' learning of English verb argument structure

Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies

مقاله 1، دوره 3، شماره 3، اردیبهشت 2015، صفحه 7-26   

نویسنده

Payam Pourfallah

Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch

مراجع

Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26:339_356.

Akhtar, N. and, Tomasllo, M. 1997. Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33.952-65.

 

Allen, S. (2000). A discourse pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483-521.

 

Alishahi, A. (2005).  A Survey on Computational Models for Argument Structure Acquisition. University of Toronto

 

Baker, M. (1989). Object Sharing and Projection in Serial Verb Constructions, Linguistic Inquiry 20:513-553.

 

Baker, M,. Johnson, K and Roberts, I. (1989). Passive Arguments Raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20:219-252.

 

Bloom, L., K. Lifter & J. Hafitz. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Language 56, 386-412.

 

Bowerman, M. (1982). Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs. Quaderni di semantica, 3:5_66.

 

Bowerman, M., & Brown, P. (Eds.) (2007). Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability. Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.236 SHANLEY ALLEN

 

Brooks,P and Tomasllo,M.1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75.720-38.

 

Chang, N. (2004). Putting meaning into grammar learning. In Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Psycho computational Models of Human Language Acquisition.

 

Chung, Taegoo. 1998. Argument Structures of English Intransitive Verbs. Korean Journal of Linguistics 20.4:271-288, Linguistic Society of Korea.

 

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

 

Cook, V. J. (1976). A note on indirect objects. Journal of Child Language 3, 435-438.

 

Clark, A. (2001). Unsupervised language acquisition: theory and practice. PhD thesis,

University of Sussex.

Davidson, D. (1967). The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In N. Rescher.(ed.) The Logic and Action, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

 

Demuth, K., Machobane, M., Moloi, F., and Odato, C. (2002). Rule learning and lexical frequency effects in learning verb-argument structure. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pages 142_153.

 

Desai, R. (2002). Bootstrapping in miniature language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling

 

Demuth, K. (2002). Learning Verb-Argument Structure: Rules and Construction Effects. Brown University and National University of Lesotho.

 

Demuth, K, Machobane, M & Moloi, F. (2001). Rules and Construction Effects in Learning the Argument Structure of Verbs. Ms., Brown University and the National University of Lesotho.

 

 

Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representation, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical

structure. Machine Learning, 7:195–225.

 

Ellis, R. (2003). Verb Argument  learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University press.

Fillmore, J. (1977). Topics in Lexical Semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. 76-138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

 

Fillmore, J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm. 111-138. Seoul: Hanshin.

 

Gropen, J, Pinker, S, Hollander, M, Goldberg, A. & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65, 203-255.

 

Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3-55.

 

Grimshaw, J and Armin M. 1988. Light Verbs and theta-Marking, Linguistic Inquiry 19:205-232.

 

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In MacWhinney, B., editor, Emergence of Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

 

 

Goldberg, A. E. (1992). The Inherent Semantics of Argument Structure: The Case of the English Ditransitive Construction. Cognitive Linguistics 3(1):37-74.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (1998). “Semantic Principles of Predication.” In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed) CSLI Publications. 41-55.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Constructions, Lexical Semantics and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for Generalizations and Subregularities in the Realization of Arguments. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (Eds.), The Syntax of Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Goldberg, A. E. & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language, 80(3), 532-568.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (2005).Verbs, constructions and semantic frames Princeton University .Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Goldberg, A. E. (2003). But do we need Universal Grammar? Comment on Lidz et al.Cognition.

 

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Goldberg, A. E. & Giulia M. L. Bencini (2004). The Contribution of Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 640–651

 

Jackendoff, R. (1985). Multiple Subcategorization and the Theta-Criterion: the Case of climb.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory3. 271-295.

 

Lidz, J & Gleitman, L. (2004). Argument structure and the child's contribution to language learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4): 157-161.

 

Larson, R. (1988). On the double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry19:335-392.

 

MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

 

Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46:53_85.

 

Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., and Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4, Serial No. 228).

 

Naigles, L., & Swensen, L. (2007). Syntactic supports for word learning. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 212-231). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

 

Niyogi, S. (2002). Bayesian learning at the syntax- semantics interface. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Nivre, J. (2006), Constraints on non-projective dependency parsing. In: Eleventh Conference of

the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pp. 73–80.

Trento, Italy

 

Nikula, H. (1986). Proceedings of the Workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar, pp. 25–32.

 

Palmer, M., Gildea, D., and Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71–106.

 

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.

 

Polina E. (2008). Semantics vs. Syntax in Verb Structure Acquisition .State University of Aerospace Instrumentation. Russia

 

Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics .Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

 

Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B. (1998). Building verb meanings, pages 97{134. CSLI Publications.

 

Sgall, P., Hajicova, E., Panevova, J. (1986): The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects.

 

Tabibzadeh, O. (2006). Verb Valency and Sentence Base Structures in Modern Persian. Tehran, Iran: Markaz

 

Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74:209_253.

 

Williams, E. (1981).  Argument Structure and Morphology. The Linguistic Review1:81-114.

 

Williams, E. (1994). Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 

Williams, E. (1995). Theta Theory. In Gert Webelhuth (ed.) Government and Binding Theory and the The Minimalist Program, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.