تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,560 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,800,509 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,843,314 |
Investigating Hortatory Force in The EFL Reading Passages | ||
Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 4، شماره 3، اردیبهشت 2016، صفحه 65-76 اصل مقاله (2.87 M) | ||
نویسنده | ||
Bardia Fallah | ||
Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This study investigates some the reading passages in terms of hortatory messages. To this end a methodology based on Critical Discourse Analysis was adopted. The reading texts from ELT textbooks were examined through a model which drew on Fairclough's approach to CDA, specifically (Fairclough, 2003) in which three characteristic features of hortatory texts are introduced. The analysis reveals that 15 reading passages of the corpus involve in hortatory messages which are characterized by the above mentioned features i.e. Evaluation, Prediction, and Legitimation strategies. These texts features were considered as markers of contemporary ‘genres of governance’ which are significant semiotic means to exert power in the process of globalization. These categories were also connected to the social issue of Habermatian model of modernity in which the ‘lifeworld’ can be ‘colonized’ by the ‘system’s instrumental rationality’ (Edgar, A. 2006). They were further linked to the concept of ‘promotional culture’ (Wernick, 1991) in the contemporary world. In the concluding section of the study, it was suggested that pedagogical approach to literacy in the textbooks be ‘critically’ revised to engage macro and micro social issues in reading comprehension activities. To this end a critical reading model, proposed by Wallace (2003) is proposed. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Hortatory text؛ Critical Discourse Analysis؛ Genres of Governance؛ Textbook؛ Evaluation؛ Legitimation | ||
مراجع | ||
Cook, G. (2003) Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and social change. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Edgar, A. (2006) Habermas: The Key Concept. London & New York: Routledge. Fairclough, N. (1992) Critical Language Awareness. London & New York: LONGMAN. Fairclough, N. (1999) Global Capitalism and Critical Awareness of Language. LANGUAG AWARENESS Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, (pp 71-83) Fairclough, N. (2000) Language and Neo-Liberalism. Discourse & Society 2000; 11; 147 Fairclough, N. & Wodak R (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk T (Ed.) Discourse as social interaction. (pp. 258-284). London: Sage. Pennycook, A. (2001) Critical applied linguistics, A critical Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pennycook, A. (2004) Critical Applied Linguistics, A Critical Introduction. In: Davies A & Elder C (Ed.) The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Richards, J. C. (2001) Curriculum Development in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. van Dijk, T. (2004) Racism, Discourse and Textbooks: The coverage of immigration in Spanish textbooks. Paper presented at the Symposium on Human Rights in Textbooks, organized by the History Foundation, Istanbul: April 2004. Wallace, C. (2003) Critical Reading in Language Education. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. Wodak, R. (2001) What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Methods of critical discourse analysis (Ed.) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 144 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 89 |