تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,560 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,801,347 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,843,963 |
استراتژی های استفاده از استانداردهای مدیریت پروژه: رویکرد مدل تعالی سازمانی اروپا | ||
فصلنامه مدیریت راهبردی در سیستم های صنعتی (مدیریت صنعتی سابق) | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 23، خرداد 1392، صفحه 1-16 اصل مقاله (918.84 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
نویسنده | ||
هیرش گل پیرا* | ||
عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج | ||
چکیده | ||
یکی از مشکلات و معایب مدل تعالی سازمانی اروپا، عدم ارائه راهکاری مشخص برای ایجاد بهبود در سازمانهاست. در این مقاله، ضمن بیان استانداردهای اثبات شده مدیریت پروژه و تاریخچه ی آنها روش ترکیبی هدف مندی از این استانداردها به گونه ای ارائه می شود که بیشترین پوشش مدل تعالی اروپا برای دستیابی به بهبود بیشتر سازمانی را فراهم آورده و از انعطاف بسیار بالایی به نسبت ارزیابی های دوره ای این مدل برخوردار است.. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
استانداردهای مدیریت پروژه؛ مدل تعالی اروپا | ||
مراجع | ||
1- Bohoris, G.A. (1995). A comparative assessment of some major quality awards. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 12 (9), 30–43. 2- Bayo, A; Moriones, A.N (2011). The impact of ISO9000 and EFQM ontheuseof flexible work practices. 3- Camison & Cesar (1996). Total quality management in hospital: in application of the EFQM model. 4- Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2003). Measuring teamwork culture: the use of a modified EFQM model. Journal of Management Development, 22(2), 149-170. 5- Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). Benchmarking intangible assets: enhancing teamwork performance using self-assessment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(6), 571-583. 6- Curkovic, S., Melnyk, S., Calantone, R. (2000). Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework through structural equation modelling. International Journal of Production Research 38 (4), 765–791. 7- Crawford, L. (2002). Background Paper of Performance Based Competency Standards, University of Technology, Sydney. 8- Crawford L. (2000). Global Body of Project Management Knowledge and Standards. Morris (Wiley) 1153-1193. 9- Dixon, M. (2000). APM Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th ed. Peterborough, UK: Association for Project Management. 10- Duncan, W. R. (1998). Presentation to Council of Chapter Presidents. PMI Annual Symposium. October 10, Long Beach, CA. 11- ENAA. 2002. P2M: A guidebook of project and program management for enterprise 12- Innovation: Summary translation, Revision 1.Tokyo: Project Management Professionals Certification Center (PMCC). 13- Goldschmidt H.M J., & Brandslund, I. (2001).The EFQM management model for TQM applied to laboratory medicine. 14- Ghobadian, A., & Woo, H.S. (1996). Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 15- Gonczi, A., Hager P. & Oliver L. (1990). Establishing competency standards in the professions. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service. 16- Hartman F., & Skulmoski G., (1998). Project Management: Project Management Maturity, Project Management Association Finland, 4(1). 17- Heywood L., Gonczi A., & Hager P. (1992). A guide to development of competency standards for professions. 18- HosainKhani, AK, International Standard BSISO 10006: 2003. 19- Hougham M. (2000). Syllabus for the APMP Examination. 2nd ed. High Wycombe, UK: Association of Project Management. 20- ISO 9000: 2000, Quality Management System – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. 21- ISO 9004: 2000, Quality Management System – Guidelines for performance improvements. 22- Ignacio, J; Castilla M, (2008). EFQM model: knowledge governance and competitive advantage 23- Jacobs, B & Suckling, S. (2007). Assessing customer focus using the EFQM Excellence Model: a local government case Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK. 24- Kerzner H., (2003). Project Management, a systems approach to planning, Scheduling and controlling. John Wiley. 25- Kim D.Y., Kumar V. & Murphy S. A. (2008). Carleton University European foundation for quality management (EFQM) business excellence model: a literature review and future research agenda. ASAC. 26- Lee, S.M., Rho, B.H., Lee, S.G. (2003). Impact of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria on organizational quality performance. International Journal of Production Research 41 (9), 2003–2021. 27- McCarthy, G., & Greatbanks, R. (2005). Impact of EFQM Excellence Model on leadership in German and UK Organizations. Manchester Business School, UK. 28- Morris, P. W. G. (2000). Benchmarking project management bodies of knowledge. In IRNOP IV Conference Paradoxes of Project Collaboration in the Global Economy: Interdependence, Complexity and Ambiguity, ed. L. Crawford and C. F. Clarke. Sydney, Australia: University of Technology, Sydney. 29- Morris, P. W. G., Patel M. B. & Wearne S. H. (2000). Research into revising the APM Project Management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management 18(3):155–164. 30- Nabitz U.W & Klazinga N.S. (1999). EFQM approach and the Dutch Quality Award 31- None to Claim Their Bones (1996) APM: Body of Knowledge (Version 3). High Wycombe, UK: Association of Project Managers. 32- None to Claim Their Bones (2000). BS 6079-2: 2000, Project Management – Vocabulary. 33- Panahi M., Hamze Nejad A., Motaghi & M., Barzegar M. (2012). Ranking of Effective Factors on Lack of Proper Consultation of Employee's Criteria Results in Model EFQM by AHP Method (Search Case: Iran Khodro Diesel Company), J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(12)12283-12293. 34- Pannenbacker, K., Knopfel H. & Caupin G. (1998). PMA and its validated four- level Certi fication Programs, Nijkerk, Netherlands: International Project Management Association. 35- Pannenbacker O., Knoepfel H., & Communier J. (2002). IPMA Certification, Year book 2001, Nijkerk, Netherlands: International Project Management Association. 36- PMI Standards Open Working Session October (2002). www.pmi.org/info/PP OWS02.pdf (accessed January 1. 37- Project Management Institute (PMI) (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition 38- Rusjan, B. (2005). Usefulness of the EFQM excellence model: Theoretical explanation of some conceptual and methodological issues. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(3), 363-380. 39- Sonnekus R. & Lubuschagne. L. (2003). It Project Management Maturity versus Project Succes in South African. 40- Tarí, J. J. (2006). An EFQM model self-assessment exercise at a Spanish university. J. of Educational Administration, 44(2), 170-188. 41- Van der Wiele, A., Williams, A.R.T., Dale, B.G. (2000). ISO 9000 series registration to business excellence: the migratory path. Business Process Management 6 (5), 417–427. 42- Wideman, R. M. 1986. The PMBOK Report. Project Management J. 15. 43- Wongrassamee, S., Simmons, J. E. L., & Gardiner, P. D. (2003). Performance measurement tools: the Balanced Scorecard and the EFQM Excellence Model. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), 14-29. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 337 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 192 |