تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,560 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,800,509 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,843,313 |
Group-Work Dynamics: Its effects on EFL IELTS Candidates’ Structural Accuracy and Self-Regulation | ||
Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 7، شماره 1، آذر 2018، صفحه 91-112 اصل مقاله (3.13 M) | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Zahra Zohoorian* 1؛ Khalil Motallebzadeh1؛ Mahshid Khazaee2 | ||
1English Department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran | ||
2English department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Group-work dynamics has been assumed to explain a great part of impact in language learning and teaching in specific contexts or for particular skills. In the same vein, structural accuracy has been significant in foreign language learning. Today, foreign language learning is not limited to the classroom environment. In addition, it encompasses the learner’s lives, so that selfregulation’s role seems to be prominent. Accordingly, this study explored the effect of groupwork dynamics on EFL IELTS candidates’ structural accuracy and self-regulation. The findings of this quasi-experimental mixed-method study revealed that group-work dynamics did not have a significant effect on the structural accuracy and self-regulation of the participants. Overall, as the analysis of the open-ended questions confirmed, the employment of Group-work Dynamics was not appealing to the students as they emphasized that learning grammatical points and structural notes requires more control of the teacher rather than peers. Moreover, they highlighted that they believed that group work and other tasks need to be practiced in a conversation class to enhance the speaking skill. | ||
مراجع | ||
Beebe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2003). Communicating in small groups: principles and practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2006). Innovations in teacher education: A social constructivist approach. Albany: SUNY Press. Becker, K. L. (2003). Just Tell Me What to Do: Group Dynamics in a Virtual Environment. Paper presented at the Women in Research Conference, 13-14 November, Rockhampton, Australia. Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326-339. Boekaerts, M. & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention. Applied psychology, 54(2), 199–231. Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The Self-Regulation Questionnaire. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 17, pp. 281-289). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press. Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research method in education. London: Routledge. Dörnyei, Z., & Malderez, A. (1999). The role of group dynamics in foreign language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Duru, E., Duru, S. & Murat, B. (2014). Analysis of Relationships among Burnout, Academic Achievement, and Self-Regulation. Educational sciences: theory and practice, 14(4), 1274-1284. Ehrman, M. & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language education. California: Sage Publications. Ellis, N, C. (1998). Emergenism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-64. Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 4-22. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press. Freeman, K. & Gahungu, A. (2013). Small Group Dynamics in Cross-Cultural Collaborative field research: Voices from the field. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 8(2), 77-94. Freeman, L., & Greenacre, L. (2011). An Examination of Socially Destructive Behaviors in Group Work. Journal of marketing education, 33 (1), 5-17. Garcia T., Pintrich P.R. (1996) Assessing Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Classroom Context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In: Birenbaum M., Dochy F.J.R.C. (Eds) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, 42. 319- 339. Gorse, C. A., & Sanderson, A. M. (2007). Exploring group work dynamics. In D. Boyd. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference (pp.295-296). United Kingdom: Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kivunja, C. (2014). Do you want your students to be job-ready with 21st century skills? Change pedagogies: a paradigm shift from Vygotskyian social constructivism to critical thinking, problem solving and siemens' digital connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 81 – 91. Lantolf, J. & Throne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mart, C. (2013). Teaching Grammar in Context: Why and How? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 124-129. Miedijensky, S. & Lichtinger, E. (2016). Seminar for Master’s Thesis Projects: Promoting Students' Self-Regulation. International journal of higher education, 5(4), 13-26. Poupore, G. (2015). Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task motivation and language production. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 1–22. Qureshi, M. A. & Stormyhr, E. (2012). Group dynamics and peer-tutoring a pedagogical tool for learning in higher education. Education studies, 5(2), 118-124. Rimmer, W. (2006). Measuring grammatical complexity: The Gordian knot. Language Testing, 23, 497-519. Rogers, A. (2002). Teaching adults. Canada: Open University Press. Rossin, D. & Hyland, T. (2010). Group Work-based Learning within Higher Education: An integral ingredient for the personal and social development of students. Mentoring and tutoring: partnership in learning, 11(2), 153-162. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-Regulation and Academic Learning: Self-Efficacy Enhancing Interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (Pp. 631-649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2007). Influencing Children’s Self-Efficacy and Self- Regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 7-25. Siti Rohani, Z. (2007). Teaching of grammar: Teachers’ beliefs, instructional context, and practices (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Toseland, R., J., Jones, L. V., & Gellis, Z. D. (2004). Group dynamics. In C. D. Garvin, L. M. Gutierrez, & M. J. Galinsky (Eds.), Handbook of social work with groups (pp. 13-31). New York: Guilford Publications. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2009). Motives to self-regulate learning: A Social cognitive account. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 247-264). New York, NY: Routledge. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 110 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 165 |