Social Factors Affecting Spouse Selection Criteria

Sociological Studies of Youth

مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 32، خرداد 2019، صفحه 37-48   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Masoumeh Motlaq^{* 1}؛ Leila Shojaei²

¹Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

²Department of Sociology, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

چکیده

 The purpose of this study is to identify spouse selection criteria among Islamic Azad university students in Malayer.The research was based on survey method and a questionnaire is used to collect data. The sample size was 365 participants who selected based on classified sampling. The data was analyzed using statistical analysis. Also sociological theories including theories of marriage used to study families and theoretical framework. The results were classified into categories such as material/nonmaterial, personal/family criteria for spouse selection. As if university students valued both nonmaterial criteria like romance and love. The findings show that there are significant relationships between socio–economic status, education, age, and spouse selection among university students. Implications of this study are also discussed.

مراجع

Beck, U. & Elisabeth, B. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Mass Blackwell.

Bernard, J. (1982) The future of marriage. New York: Columbia University Press.

Besharov, D., & Sullivan, T. (1996). Welfare-reform and marriage. Public Interest 125, 81–94.

Blau, P., Terry, B. & Joseph, S. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage." American Sociological Review 47, 45–62.

Bossard, J. (1932). Residential ppropinquity as a factor in marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 38, 219–224.

Bulcroft, K., Richard B., Laurie, H. & Edgar, F. (1989). Antecedents and consequences of remarriage in later life. Research on Aging, 11, 82–106.

Bulcroft, R., & Kris, B. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 338–355.

Centers, R. (1975). Sexual attraction and love: An instrumental theory. Springfield: C. Thomas.

Guttentag, M. (1983 ). Too many women? Calif: Sage.

Homans, GC. (1961). Social behavior. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.

Houts, R., Ellio, R., & Ted, H. (1996). Compatibility and development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 7–20.

Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue-collar marriage. New York, NY: Random House.

Lewis, R. (1973). A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35,16–27.

Lystra, K. (1989). Searching the heart: Women, men, and romantic love in nineteenth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mindel, Ch., Haberstein, R. & Wright, R (1988). Ethnic families in America: Patterns and Variations. New York: Elsevier North Holland.

Murstein, B. (1974). Love, sex, and marriage through the ages. New York: Springer.

O'Flaherty, K., & Laura, E. (1988). Courtship behavior of the remarried. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 499–506.

Reiss, I. (1960). Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship. Marriage and Family Living, 22, 139–145.

Rodgers, R., & Linda, C. (1986). Courtship for remarriage: Influences on family reorganization after divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 767–775.

Rubin, L. B. (1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working-class family. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Schoen, R., & Wooldredge, R. (1989). Marriage choices in North Carolina. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 465–481.

Spanier, G. & Glick, P. (1980). Paths to remarriage. Journal of Divorce, 3, 283–298.

Surra, C. (1990). Research and theory on mate selection and premarital relationships in the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 844–856.

Takagi, D. (1994). Japanese Americanfamilies: A multicultural perspective. Engelwood: Prentice Hall.

Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Quill.

Veevers, J. (1988). The real marriage squeeze: Mate selection mortality and the marriage gradient. Sociological Perspectives, 31,169–189.