Investigation Effect of Different Irrigation Regime and Super Absorbent Poly-mer on Seed Yield and Morphological Traits of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Journal of Crop Nutrition Science

مقاله 6، دوره 4، شماره 4، اسفند 2018، صفحه 62-75   

نویسندگان

Mahshid Kazempor¹؛ Saeed Zakernejad^{* 2}

¹Msc. Graduated, Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

²Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

چکیده

BACKGROUND: Alternative furrow irrigation method is an effective procedure to reduce the amount of irrigation water in arid areas for economic production.
OBJECTIVES: Assessment seed yield, its components and morphological characteristics of corn affected different level of irrigation regime and super absorbent polymer (SAP) under warm and dry climate condition.
METHODS: This research was conducted according split plot experiment based on randomized complete blocks design during 2016 with three replications. The main factor included three irrigation regimes (I₁: Conventional irrigation or control, I₂: Alternate furrow irrigation from 4 leaves stage until silk emergence and after conventional, I₃: Normal irrigation until silk emergence and after alternate furrow irrigation), also three level of super absorbent polymer (S₁: non use of SAP or control, S₂: 25 kg.ha^-1, S₃: 50 kg.ha^-1) belonged to the sub factor.
RESULT: The results of analysis of variance revealed the effect of different irrigation regimes on all measured traits (instead number of row per ear) was significant, also effect of different level of SAP on all measured traits (instead number of row per ear) (instead Ear diameter, stem diameter and number of row per ear) was significant, but interaction effect of treatment on all measured traits (instead number of seeds per ear and seed yield) was not significant. Evaluation mean comparison result of different irrigation regimes indicated maximum amount of plant height, ear length, ear diameter, stem diameter, number of row per ear, number of seed per row, number of seed per ear, 1000-Seed weight and seed yield was noted for I₁ and minimum of mentioned traits belonged to I₂ treatment. Also compare different level of SAP showed that the maximum and the minimum amount of measured traits belonged to S₃ and S₁ treatments.
CONCLUSION: Generally according result of current research I₃ treatment had lowest decrease in seed yield, its components and morphological traits so in water resource limitation I₃ treatment with use 50 kg.ha^-1 SAP it can be advice to producers.

کلیدواژه‌ها

corn؛ Deficit irrigation؛ Ear length؛ Plant height

مراجع

Ahmadpour, A., B. Farhadi Bansoula. and M. Ghobadi. 2017. Effects of deficit irrigation on growth trend, quantity and quality characteristics of maize in Kermanshah. J. Water and Soil Resour. Conservaion. 6(3): 99-112. (Abstract in English)

Allah Dadi, A., B. Moazen Ghamsari, G. H. Akbari. and M. Zohoorian Mehr. 2005. Investigation of the effect of different amount of water super absorbent polymer 200-A and irrigation levels on growth and yield of forage corn. Proc. 3^rd Specific Sym. Appl. Super Absorbent Polymer Hydrogels Agriculture. Iran Petro Chem. Polymer Res. Center. Tehran. Iran. (Abstract in English)

Al-Kaisi, M. M. and X. Yin. 2014. Effects of nitrogen rate, irrigation rate, andplant population on corn yield and water use efficiency. Agron. J. 95: 1475-1482.

Bahrani, A., J. Pourreza, A. Madani. and F. Amiri. 2012. Effect of PRD irrigation method and potassium fertilizer application on corn yield and water use efficiency. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 18: 616-625. In: Rosegrant, M. W., N. Leach. and R. V. Gerpacio. 1999. Alternative future for world cereal and meat consumption. Summer Meet. Nutr. Soc. Guildford, UK. 29 June-2 July. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 58: 1-16.

Camp, C. R., D. R. Karlen. and J. R. Lambert. 2006. Irrigation scheduling and row configuration for corn in the south Easter coastal plain. Trans. ASAE. 28:1159-1165.

Campos, H., M. Cooper, J. E. Habben, G. O. Edmeades. and J. R Schussler. 2004. Improving drought tolerance in maize view from industry. Field Crop Res. 90: 19-34.

Davison, D., D. D. Tarkalson. and S. Irmak. 2016. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation and zeolite on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass. Agri. Water Manage. 96: 1387–1397.

Denmead, O. T and R. H. Shaw. 1960. The effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth on the development and yield of corn. Agron. J. 52: 272-274.

Dorraji, S. S., A. Golchin. and S. Ahmadi. 2010. The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. J. Clean Soil, Air, Water. 38(7): 584-591.

Foroughi, F. 2006. The deficit irrigation of maize on the basis of water production function yield. Natl. Conf. Manage. Irri. Drainage Networks. Chamran Univ. Ahvaz. Iran. (Abstract in English)

Geerts, S. and D. Raes. 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agri. Water Manage. 96: 1275-1284.

Ghanbari, M. and B. Miri. 2013. Study of corn reaction to super absorbent application under drought stress conditions. 1^st Natl. Conf. Agri. Sci. Emphasis on Abiotic Stress. PNU Univ. Naghadeh Branch. Naghadeh. Iran. (Abstract in English)

Ghorbani, G. and A. Hezarjaribi. 2009. Effect of irrigation water deficit on yield and yield components of cotton varieties. J. Irri. Drain. Iran. 2: 53-59. (Abstract in English)

Hanks, R. J. 1974. Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use. Argon. J. 66: 660-665.

Islam, M. R., Y. Hu, Ch. Fei, X. Qian, A. E. Eneji. and X. Xue. 2011. Application of superabsorbent polymer: A new approach for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in drought-affected areas of northern China. J. Food, Agric. Environ. 9(1): 304-309.

Kang, S., Z. Liang, Y. Pan, P. Shi. and J. Zhang. 2000a. Alternate furrow irrigation for maize production in an arid area. Agric. Water Manage. 45(3): 267-274.

Kang, S. Z., P. Shi, Y. H. Pan, Z. S. Liang, X. T. Hu. and J. Zhang. 2000b. Soil Water distribution uniformity and water use efficiency under alternative furrow irrigation. Irri. Sci. 19(4): 181-190.

Kassam, A. H., D. Molden, E. Fereres. and J. Doorenbos. 2007. Water productivity: science and practice – introduction. Irrigation Sci. 25: 185–188.

Kirda, C., S. Topcu, H. Kaman, A. C. Ulger, A. Yazici, M. Cetin. and M. R. Derici. 2005. Seed yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Res. 93: 132–141.

Khalili Mahalleh, J., H. Heidari Sharif Abad, Gh. Nourmohammadi, F. Darvish, I. Majidi Haravan. and I. Valizadegan. 2011. Effect of superabsorbent polymer (Tarawat A 200) on forage yield and some qualitative characters in corn under deficit Irrigation condition in Khoy zone (Northwest of Iran). Adv. Environ. Biol. 5(9): 2579-2587. In: Nazarli, H., M. R. Zardashti, R. Darvishzadeh. and S. Najafi, 2010. The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits of sunflower. Not Sci. Biol. 2(4): 53-58.

Kohestani, Sh., N. Askari. and K. Maghsoudi. 2009. Assessment effects of super absorbent hydro gels on corn yield (Zea mays L.) under drought stress condition. Iranian Water Res. J. 3(5): 71-78. (Abstract in English)

Larbi, A. and A. Mekliche. 2004. Relative water content (RWC) and leaf senescence as screening tools for drought tolerance in wheat. Options Mediterranèennes Series A, Seminaires Mediterranèens. 60: 193–196.

Memar, M. R. and M. Mojaddam. 2015. The effect of irrigation intervals and different amounts of super absorption on the on yield and yield components of sesame in hamidiyeh weather conditions .Indian J. Fundamental and Appl. Life Sci. 5 (3): 350-365.

Moazzan Qamsari, B. and Gh. Akbari. 2006. Investigating the application of super adsorbent polymers as an important strategy in reducing the effects of drought stress in crops. Proc. 9^th Iranian Cong. Agron. Plant Breed. pp: 153-173. (Abstract in English)

Mohammadi, Y. 2011. Evaluation effect of different amounts of water consumption and planting arrangement on seed yield of corn at Khuzestan province. Msc. Thesis. Chamran University. 117 pp. (Abstract in English)

Mohammadpour, M., A. Afrous. and A. Papizadeh Palangan. 2013. The yield functions of Maize toward the deficit irrigation in the tropical climate of Dezfoul. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2(2): 1-4.

Mojaddam, M., T. Abbas Torkii. and Gh. R. Abadouz. 2012. Effect of Irrigation amount on yield, yield components and water use Efficiency of corn hybrids. Am.-Eurasian. J. Sustain. Agri. 6(1): 1-5. In: English, M. J. and L. James. 1990. Deficit irrigation. П: Observation on Colombia basin. ASCE. J. Irri. Drain. Eng. 116: 413-426.

Naseri, R., A. Moghada, F. Darab, A. Hatami. and Gh. R. Tahmasebei. 2013. The Effect of deficit irrigation and Azotobacter Chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense on grain yield, yield components of maize (S.C. 704) as a second cropping in western Iran. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2(10): 104-112.

Nazarli, H., M. R. Zardashti, R. Darvishzadeh. and S. Najafi. 2010. The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits of sunflower. Notulae Sci. Biol. 2(4): 53-58.

Nesmith, D. S. and J. T. Ritchie. 1992. Short-and long-term responses of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit. Agron. J. 84: 107-113.

Nishi Mathur, J., S. Oginder, B. Sachendra, B. Avinash. and V. Anil. 2007. Agronomic evaluation of promising genotypes of Mungbean under hyper arid conditions of Indian Thar Desert. Intl. J. Agri. Res. 2(6): 537-544.

Pandey, R. K., J. W. Marienville and A. Adum. 2000. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effect on maize in a Sahelian environment. I. Grain yield components. Agricultural Water Management. J. 46: 1-13.

Rafie, F., G. Nourmohammadi, R. Chokan, A. Kashani. and H. Haidari Sharif Abad. 2013. Investigation of superabsorbent polymer usage on maize under water stress.Global J. Medicinal Plant Res. 1(1): 82-87.

Rajaei, F. and F. Raeisi. 2010. The role of super absorbent A200 on control of drought stress and its effect on nitrogen activity and enzyme activity in soil. Iranian J. Water Res.7: 13-24. (Abstract in English)

Ritchie, S. W. and J. J. Hanway. 1997. How a corn plant develops. Spec. Rep. No. 48. Iowa State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Ames. USA.

Salehi, R., A. Maleki. and H. Dehghanzadeh. 2012. Effect of potassium and zinc on seed yield and its components of maize under water stress. J. Crop Prod. Environ. Stress Conditions. 4(3): 59-70. (Abstract in English)

Salemi, H., M. A. M. Soom, T. Sh. Lee, M. K. Yusoff. and D. Ahmad. 2011. Effects of deficit irrigation on water productivity and Maize yields in arid regions of Iran. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 34(2): 207–216. In: English, M. 1990. Deficit irrigation. Analytical framework. J. Irrigation and Drainage Eng. 116(3): 399-412.

Samsamipoor, M., P. Afrasiab, M. R. Emdad, M. Delbari. and F. Karandish. 2015. Evaluation of corn forage yield and yield components under alternate furrow irrigation. Iranian J. Soil and Water Res. 46(1): 11-18. (Abstract in English)

Sepasi, Sh., K. Kelarastaghi. and H. Ebrahimi. 2012. Effects of different levels drought stress and plant density on yield and yield components of Corn (Zea mays, SC. 704). J. Crop Eco-physiology. 6(3): 279-288. (Abstract in English)

Sepaskhah, A. R., A. R. Tavakoli. and F. Mousavi. 2006. The deficit irrigation. Iranian Natl. Committee Irri. Drain. Publ. 287 pp. (Abstract in English)

Shiklomanov, I. 1998. Pictures of the future: A review of global water resources projections. In: Gleick P. H. World’s Water 2000–2001. Island Press. Washington D.C. USA. 53 pp.

Sinclair, T., R. D. M. Bennetto and R. O. Muchow. 1990. Relative sensitivity of grain yield and biomass accumulation to drought in field grown maize. Crop Science. J. 30: 690- 693.

Soltanbeigi, A. 2009. Effects of seeds priming with C.C.C. and irrigation cutting in different stages of growth and developments of corn cultivars. M.Sc. Thesis. Islamic Azad University. Khoy Branch. Khoy. Iran. 137 pp.

Tagheianaghdam, A., S. R. Hashemi, A. Khashei. and A. Shahidi. 2015. The effect of deficits irrigation method of alternative furrow irrigation on yield of Sweet Corn. Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol. 10(10): 816-822.

Tavakoli, A. R. 1999. Optimization of deficit irrigation based on yield functions and costs and with optimum use of water resources in agriculture objective. In: Tavakoli, A. R. (Ed.). Water Res. Conf. Tabriz. Iran. (Abstract in English)

Tousi-Mojarrad, M. and M. R. Ghannadha. 2012. Evaluation seed yield potential and dry matter remobilization to seed in economical beard wheat variety under normal and water stress conditions. J. Agri. Sci. Natur. Resour. 4: 323-338. (Abstract in English)

Valadabadi, A. D., D. Mazaheri. and A. Hashemi dezfooli. 2014. Study of effects of drought stress on quantitative and qualitative traits of corn. 7^th Iranian Cong. Crop Produc. Plant Breed. Karaj. Iran. 436 pp. (Abstract in English)

Valifar, A., Gh. Moafpoorian, M. S. Tadayon. and Gh. Ashraf Mansouri. 2013. The effects of optimal potassium nourishment and different irrigation management on the decreased consumptive used water in corn. J. Plant Ecophysiol. 5(14): 45-58. (Abstract in English)

Wu, L., M. Liu. and R. Liang. 2010. Preparation and properties of a double- coated slow-release NPK. Compound fertilizer with superabsorbent and water-retention of corn. Bioresource Tech. 99(3): 547-54.

Yang, C. M., M. J. Fan. and W. M. Hsiang. 1993. Growth and yield responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to water deficit timing and strength. J. Agri. Res. China. 42: 173-186.

Yousefi, K., M. Galavi, M. Ramroudi. and M. A. Javaheri. 2010. Investigation of Biological phosphate fertilizer-2 fertilized with foliar applications of micronutrient elements on dry matter accumulation and yield components of corn. 11^th Iranian Crop Sci. Cong. Shahid Beheshti Univ. Iran. (Abstract in English)

Zwart, S. J. and W. G. M. Bastiaanssen. 2004. Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agri. Water Manage. 69: 115-133.