Comparison and analysis of the cognitive effect of the role of memory index on promoting the sense of belonging of residents in new and old neighborhoods in Shiraz City

Space Ontology International Journal

مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 37، شهریور 2021، صفحه 61-72   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22094/soij.2021.1925708.1410

نویسندگان

Shahrad PourMohammad¹؛ Seyyed Alireza Shojaei^{* 2}؛ Hosein Kalantari Khalil Abad³؛ Masoud Taghvaei⁴

¹Ph.D. Candidate of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj Branch

²Assistant Professor of Architecture and Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad Branch,Iran

³Associate Professor of Urban Planning and Management, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

⁴Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده

The man-made environment in which man lives is not merely a scientific tool or the result of aimless events, rather it is structured and embodies meaning. These meanings and structures reflect man's understanding of the natural and man-made environment and his general state of being. The meaning that man understands from the man-made environment, individually or socially, creates memories in his mind which ultimately increases the sense of belonging of residents to the living space. To create more meaningful spaces and promote the sense of belonging of residents to the space of their residence, this study sought to discover the memorable factors affecting the sense of belonging of residents to their living space. To evaluate the theoretical model, three neighborhoods including Sang-e Siah, Ishaq Beyg, and Morgh Bazaar were selected from the old neighborhoods of Shiraz, and three neighborhoods including Abiyari, Eslah Nejad, and Havabord were selected as a case study from the new neighborhoods of Shiraz and a questionnaire was distributed. The basic research method of this paper was a correlation. The data of the questionnaire were evaluated using Spss software, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Spearman's ρ), Tukey, ANOWA, Paired Sample T-Test, and Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson's r). The memory factor was the independent variable and the sense of belonging was the dependent variable. The results of the present study indicated the importance of the memory factor in promoting a sense of belonging in all neighborhoods. Accordingly, the effect of social memories was greater than physical memories on promoting the sense of belonging of neighborhood residents and in general, the sense of belonging of residents to neighborhoods in the new fabric was much less than the old texture. Overall, the index of reminiscent elements from physical memories and familiarity with the neighborhood from social memories had the most impact and the factor of historical buildings from physical memories and non-governmental organizations from social memories had the least effect on promoting residents' sense of belonging to the living space.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Sense of belonging to a place؛ collective memories؛ historical neighborhoods؛ newly built neighborhoods

مراجع

1. Afsar, K. (1972) History of the historical context of Shiraz. Shiraz: Ziba publication.
2. Amirkafi, M. (2011) ‘Investigating the Factors Affecting Residential Attachment’, Iranian Journal of Social Studies (130): 5-41. (In Persian)
3. Azadi, Z. and Partovi, P. (2017) ‘A comparative study of the position of Tehran squares in preserving and promoting the collective memory of citizens (Case study: Tajrish Square and Baharestan Square)’, Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies 1(4):63-72. (In Persian)
4. Bonaiuto Marino, A., Antonio, P. and Marco, B. (1999) ‘Mutidimensional perception of Residential Enrironment Quality and Neighbourhood attachment in the urban Environment’, Journal of Environment osychology 6(14): 331-281.
5. Canter, D. (1971). The psychologyof place.  London: The Architectrual press.
6. Cross, J. (2005). What is sense of place? Research on place and space website. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Eghbali, B. (2016). Celebrating the victory of Iranian football against the United States, Broadcasting Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Research Planning. Tehran: Studies and Measurement Center. (In Persian)
8. Esmaeian, S. and Ranjbar, E. (2018) ‘A Comparative Study of Components Affecting the Formation and Transmission of Collective Memories in Public Urban Spaces (Case Study: Tehran, Tajrish Square, Baharestan Square and Shahr Theater Square)’, Armanshahr Magazine 3(11): 42- 61.
9. Falamaki, M. (2003). A Journey in Urban Restoration Experiences from Venice to Shiraz. Tehran: Space Publishing. (In Persian)
10. Fallahat, M. (2006) ‘The Concept of Sense of Place and Its Components’, Journal of Fine Arts 6(26): 66-57. (In Persian)
11. Gifford Robert, H., Muller, C and Shaw Kelly, T. (2002) ‘Why Architects and Laypersons Judge buldings Difrently: cogniteire properties and physical properties and physical bases’, Journal of Architetural and planning Research, 4(19): 131- 148.
12. Gustafson, P. (2018) ‘Meaning of place: Every Day Experience and Theorethical conceptualization’, Journal of Environmental psychology 5(3): 5-16
13. Habibi, S. (2018a) ‘Urban Space, Event Life, and Collective Memories’, Sefeh Magazine 6(14):91-107. (In Persian)
14. Habibi, R. (2018b) ‘Mental Imagination and the Concept of Place’, Journal of Fine Arts 9 (35): 5-39. (In Persian)
15. Halbwacks, M. (2015). The collectire memory .London: Harper colophon press.
16. Hosseini Komaleh, M. and Sotoudeh Alambaz, F. (2018) ‘The role of collective memory in the revitalization of urban textures, providing a solution for the historical area of Lahijan’, Journal of Fine Arts-Architecture and Urban Planning, 18(4): 52-67. (In Persian)
17. Hung Ng, S. et al (2005) ‘People living in ageing buildings: Their quality of life and sense of belonging’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 7(24): 347–360.
18. Hauge, C. (2019). Planning and place identity, in: place identity, participation and planning. London: Sage.
19. Hidalg, C. and Hernandez, B. (2019) ‘place Attachment: conceptual and Empirical Questions’, Journal of Environmental psychology 6(21): 273-281.
20.  Hummon, D. (1992). Community Attachment: Local sentiment and senci of place. NewYork: Plenum press.
21. Jorgensen, B. and Stedman, R. (2006) ‘A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions, Journal of Environmental management’, 8(12): 19-37.
22. Kashani Joo, K. (2017) ‘Recognizing the Theoretical Approach to Urban Public Space’, Journal of City Identity 6(22): 95-106. (In Persian)
23. Khak Zand, M. and Teymouri Gardeh, S. (2020) ‘A Study of the Impact of Ashura Rituals on Urban Landscape and Collective Memories from Citizens' Perspectives’, Quarterly Journal of Islamic Iran 5(19): 71-89. (In Persian)
24. Lewicka, M. (2018) ‘place athachment, place identity, and place memory: retoring the forgotten city past’, Journal of Environmental psychology 2(5):1-23
25. Lotfi, S. and Sholeh, M. (2017). Khani Abad neighborhood: the birthplace of Jahan Pahlavan Takhti. Tehran: Cultural Research Office. (In Persian)
26. Merrian- Webster collegiate Dictionary. (2003). 10 edition, merriam – Webster Incorporated Springfield.
27. MirMoghtadaei, M. (2019) ‘Criteria for measuring the possibility of formation, recording and transfer of collective memories in the city’, Journal of Fine Arts 9(37): 25-41. (In Persian)
28. Misztal, B. (2017). Theories of Social Remembering. Open UN Press.
29. Motalebi, G. (2019) ‘Recognizing the Relationship between Form and Performance in Architecture’, Journal of Fine Arts 6(25): 55-64. (In Persian)
30. Nasar, J. (2016). The Evaluative Image of the city. London: Sage publication.
31. Nazer Safavi, F. and Khastou, M. (2018). ‘Investigating the Effective Factors on the Sense of Place in Relation to Urban Migrations (Case Study: City of Qazvin)’, Space Ontology International Journal 7(2): 55-67. (In Persian)
32. Nofel, S., Kalbadi, P. and Pourjafar, M. (2017) ‘Study and evaluation of effective indicators in urban identity (Case study: Jolfa neighborhood in Isfahan)’, Armanshahr neighborhood 4(3): 22-35
33. Paez, D., Basabe, N. and Gonzalez, J. (2017). Social processes and collective memory: a cross cultural approach toremembering political events. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Pakzad, J. (2018). The course of ideas in urban planning. Tehran: Shahidi Publications. (In Persian)
35. Cuthbert, A. (2019). The from of cities, Blackwell publishing. Sydney: culthure press.
36. Relph, E. (2019). Place and place lessness. London: pion press.
37. Rezaei, H. (2018). ‘A Creative Cycle of Promotion: From Architectural Creativity to theSense of Placeand its ResultingCreativeness’, Space Ontology International Journal 9(4): 15-27. (In Persian)
38. Shills, E. (2016). Tradition. Chicago: UN. Chicago Press.
39. Sholeh, M. (2016) ‘The Old Gate in the Memory of the Contemporary City Finding the Roots of Memory Fields’, Journal of Fine Arts 7(27): 17-26. (In Persian)
40. Siew-wai lim, W. (2017) ‘Memories and Urban places’, Journal of Fine Arts 4(2): 270-277.
41. Soltani, A., Zargari Marandi, E. and Namdarian, A. (2020) ‘Formation, strengthening and maintenance of memory in urban spaces (Case study: Shahid Chamran axis of Shiraz)’, Journal of Housing and Rural Environment (141): 22-37. (In Persian)
42. Tawahi, M., BabaNasab, R. and Mousavi, Ch. (2009) ‘An Analysis on Measuring Factors Affecting Citizens' Participation in Urban Management Case Study: Region 4 of Tabriz’, Urban and Regional Studies and Research 1(2): 36-58. (In Persian)
43. Varsi, H., Alizadeh, J. and Salehi, M. (2017) ‘Analysis and Evaluation of Residents in New Cities (Case Study: Fooladshahr New City)’, Scientific Journal of Spatial Planning 1(3):88-102. (In Persian)
44. Tuan, Y. (1997). Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: university of Minnesota press.
45. Wilson, R. (2016). Collective memory, group minds and the extended mind thesis. London: Sage.