Theoretical Model Development for Agricultural Extension in Iran’s Resistive Economy

International Journal Of Agricultural Science, Research And Technology In Extension And Education Systems

دوره 11، شماره 3، آذر 2021، صفحه 133-143   

نوع مقاله: Review and Qualitative Article

نویسندگان

Neda Seyedan¹؛ Iraj Malek Mohammadi^{* 1}؛ Seyed Jamal Farajollah Hosseini¹؛ Reza Moghaddasi²

¹Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

²Department of Agricultural Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

This disruption of the economy created many problems for people in these sanctioned countries including Iran. This article is provided to explain Resistive Economics Agricultural Extension Education developed for the Iran by applying Grounded theory process to develop agricultural sector’s planning and solving sanction problems problems. This study aimed to provide a paradigm model of resistive economy in agriculture sector to secure sustainable development of agriculture in the country economic sector. Because of using grounded theory process, we were able to formulate a theory of factors influencing the formation of Agricultural Extension Education modeling in the resistive economics era, in which 21 experts and pundits in the field of agriculture and economics involved, through theoretical sampling method. Data collected by semi-structured interview and coded for data analysis using MAXQDA12 software. A total of 122 codes, 34 categories and 4 main categories, were extracted. The main categories included weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats in the agricultural sector regarding SWOT process in the sanction era to promote Iran’s agricultural sector. The results showed that the most influential economic deterrent in Iran’s agriculture was the high cost of production (impact factor = 62.9), and the most impacting factor leading the agricultural economy was planning the right policies for agricultural macroeconomics (impact factor = 54.3). The most deterrent factor in dealing with the role of government was government intervention in the agricultural resistive economy (impact factor = 52.2) and finally the food security was the next influential factor (impact factor = 37.7) regard.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Resistive Economics؛ Modeling Agricultural؛ Extension education؛ Agricultural development؛ Grounded theory

مراجع

1. Alipour, R. (2014). Resistive economics: Review of dimensions and characteristics, letter of work and society, 4(186), 55-64.
2. Attride, D.R. and Stirling, H.J. (2001). Qualitative research in ursing, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams Company.
3. Bani, P., Emami, S. and Ghanbari, D. (2007). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
4. Braun, D. Clarke, C. (2006), Nursing Research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Company.
5. Charmaz, C. (2000), & Creswell, B. (2005). Discovering chronic illness: Using Grounded Theory, Social Science and Medicine, 30.
6. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Creswell, B. & Pandit, S.H. (1996). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: The Strategies for Qualitative Research.
8. Dudashpour, J. (2004). Seeking Agricultural Sustainability, Resistive Economics and Agricultural Development, 16:137-174.
9. Fathi, A., Keshavarz, A. (2014). Organizational citizenship behaviors, another step to improve organizational operations: Trade Studies Journal. 23, 45-58.
10. Fernández, W. D. (2004). Using the glaserian approach in Grounded studies of Emerging business Practices, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(2). 88-91
11. Glaser, Barney G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: The Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, A Division of Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (U.S.A.) and London (U.K.).
12. Karami, H. Azizi, M. & F Habibi, M. (2017). The role of the private sector in meeting the requirements of a resilient economy, Quarterly Journal of New Urban Management, Second Year, No. 5, pp. 91-75.
13. Karbassian, P F. (2013). Effective Executive and Management Challenges for the 21 Century, URL: Amazon.com.
14. Kasa, D.G. (2005). Strategic Talent Management: A Review and Research Agenda, Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304-313.
15. Kumar, E.W. Somesh, C.C. (2001). Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.
16. Layeqi Moghadam, M. Kamali, V. & B Ghafouri, (1995). Extra Role Behaviors: In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (a Bridge Over Muddied Waters): Research in Organizational Behavior, Transformation Management Journal, 17, 215-285.
17. Lee, j. & Roffey, Bet H. (2001). Methodological Themes: Back to the Drawing Board: Revisiting Grounded Theory and the Everyday Accountant’s and Manager’s Reality, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(2). 88-91.
18. Malek Mohammadi, I. (2018). Agricultural extension and education in Resistive Economics of Iran. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Islamic Azad University, Tehran, PHD.
19. Mc Elwee, j. (2005). Targete planning to Extension and Economics, Resistive Economics and Agricultural Development, 34:17-30.
20. 20- Mooghli, J. Danaifar, E. & N Sallehi, (2009). An Essay on Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249–270.
21. Pandit, N. R. (1996). Methodological Themes: Back to the drawing Board: Revisiting Grounded Theory and the Everyday Accountant’s and Manager’s Reality, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(2).
22. Rezaee, Hassan; Alwani, Seyyed Mahdi and Azar, Adel (2014). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach. Tehran: Saffar Publishing.
23. Rietbergen L. Cummings, L.L. & J M Parks. (1998). Extra Role Behaviors: In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (a Bridge Over Muddied Waters): Research in Organizational Behavior, Transformation Management Journal, 17, 215-285.
24. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage.
25. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.UK: Sage Publishing.
26. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1999). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. New bury park, CA: sage publishing.
27. Tohidi, M. & Jabbari, R. (2012). Resistive Economics wise movement. quarterly Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Natural Resources Engineering, 12(44), 17-16.