Investigating social responsibility effectiveness in net profit of manufacturing companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization Journal

دوره 6، شماره 1، شهریور 2022، صفحه 83-98   

نوع مقاله: Original Research

نویسندگان

Hosein Norbakhsh¹؛ Jalal Seifodini^{* 2}؛ Masoud Movafaghi²

¹Department of Financial Management, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr branch, Islamshahr, Iran

²Department of Financial Management Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr branch, Islamshahr, Iran

چکیده

The purpose of this study is to test the moderating role of variables based on agency theory to examine the significant relationship between the impact of social responsibility and the relative net profit of manufacturing companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this study, the independent variables are the corporate social responsibility scorecard and corporate governance factors, the ratio of net profit to total assets as a dependent variable, and company size, financial leverage and age as control variables. The research community is companies operating on the Tehran Stock Exchange according to its subject and application. In this study, 165 sample companies were selected. In this study, the data of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2016 for five years were used to collect. In this research, multivariate regression analysis using the panel data method with fixed effects examines the hypothesis. The results showed that there is a direct and significant relationship between social responsibility and the company's relative net profit. Board size and board independence as factors in corporate governance modify the relationship between social responsibility and relative net profit. But government ownership has no effect on the relationship between social responsibility and the company's relative net profit.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Social Responsibility؛ Representation Theory؛ Relative Net Profit؛ Tehran Stock Exchange

مراجع

• Al-Hamouli Mahmoud, Heba S. Yassen and Faiza A. Mohamed (2021), Factor analysis of factors affecting the success of the performance of board members of rural, manufacturing, and agricultural cooperatives (Idmo city), Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 9, Winter and Spring 2021, Pages 138-152.
• Saleh Ziabari Siavash, Bagheri Akbar and  Shokravi Somayeh (2021), Investigating the effect of fluctuations of economic variables affecting the profitability of IranKhodro Manufacturing Company,Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10, Summer and Autumn 2021, Pages 131-141.
• Nouri Farid Hossein, Momeni Alireza, Gord Aziz., (2021), Designing a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model to investigate the impact of Risk Management on Corporate Profit Sharing Province, Volume 5, Issue 1 - Serial Number 9, Winter and Spring 2021, Pages 67-89.
• Afiff, Saffana & Samuel‌, P.D. Anantadjaya‌ (2020), Csr & Performance: Any Evidence from Indonesian LQ45 ?, Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research‌, Vol‌ 2 (1), pp 85-101
• Kabir, R. and Minh Thai, H.(2020). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? ", Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 29 Iss 2 pp. 1-40.
• Agnes Cheng, C. S. and Reitenga, A. (2019). Characteristics of institutional investors and discretionary accruals. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 17(1), 5–26.
• Aras, G., Crowther, D. (2019). Governance and Sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability, Journal of Management Decision, 46 (3), 433-448.
• Aupperle, K., Carroll, A. and Hatfield, J. (2018). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibilities orientations vary by position in the organizational hierarchy? Rev. Bus. 28 (3), 23-32.
• Davis, A.K., Guenther, D.A., Krull, L.K. and Williams, B.M. (2016). Do Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes? The Accounting Review, 91 (1), 47-68.
• Moghimi, R. and et al. (2013). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach, and analysis, to the evaluation of the financial performance of Iranian cement companies, Life Science Journal 10(5):570-586.
• Wuncharoen, Chotima (2013),The Relationship between‌ Corporate‌ Social‌ Responsibility‌ and‌ Firm Performance From‌ The‌ Hotel Industry of Kho samui Island, Thailand, Proceeding of 3rd Global Accounting, Finanace and Economics Conference‌ .
• Rangriz, H. (2012). Performance Evaluation of Iran Cement Companies based on AHP and TOPSIS Methods, Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2 (9): 285-292.
• Comincioli, Nicola, Laura, Poddi & Sergio, Vergalli (2012), Corporate‌ Social‌ Responsibility and Firm's Performance: a strati graphical Analysis, Publication Note di Lavoro, Available‌ at‌ SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2132202, 1395‌/08‌/22‌.
• Yalcin, N. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 350–364.
• W (2012) , The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• A, (2011) , “The Relationship between Corporate SocialResponsibility and Financial Performance: an empirical study of companies included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index”, Master Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam ,Erasmus School of Economics, Accounting, Auditing and Control.
• Carver, J. (2010). A case for global governance theory: practitioners avoid it, academics narrow it, and the world needs it. Corp. Govern. Int. Rev. 18 (2), 149---157.
• Choi, Jong-Seo; Kwak, Young-Ming; Choe, CHongwoo. (2010) . Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 53 (3) , 291-311.
• Doh, J.P., Bunyaratavej, K. and Hahn, E. (2009). Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 40 (6), 926-943.
• Zack, D. and et al.(2009) An Integrated Dynamic performance Measurement system for Improving Manufacturing competitiveness, International Journal of Production Economics,48,pp.25-207.
• A,.(2008), “Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory”, Research, and Practice. Business and Society Review. Vol.113, PP.1-41
• Brammer, S., Millington, A. and Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 18 (10), 1701-1719.
• Black, B.; Love, I.; and A. Rachinsky (2006) . “Corporate Governance Indices and Firm’s Market Value: Time Series Evidence Form Russia”, Emerging Markets Reviw 7, pp.361-379.
• Castelo, M. and Lima, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives.   Bus.  Ethics, 69, 111-132.
• Cornett, M.M., Marcus, A. J, Saunders, A. and Tehranien, H. (2006). Earnings management, corporate governance, and true financial performance. Working Papers, SSRN, 1-28.
• Deegan, C. (2006), Financial Accounting Theory, Maidenhead : McGraw-Hill Education
• Dittmar, A. and J. Mahrt-Smith  (2007). “Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings”. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 599-634.
• Fama, E. and Jensen, M. (1983). The separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
• Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Polit. Econ. 88 (2), 288-307.
• Fisher, J.M. (2014). Fairer shores: Tax havens, tax avoidance, and corporate social responsibility. Boston University Law Review, 94, 337-365.
• Fleming, M. (2002) "What is safety culture? Rail way safety ever green House, Available at: www.google.com \rwf\.
• Galli,D., Elefanti, M., Valotti, G.(2013) , “From Corporate To Shared Social Responsibility: Community Governance and Social Capital Creation Through Collaboration “,APPAM International Conference :Collaboration Among Government, Market, and Society: Forging Partnerships and Encouraging Competition , Fudan University, Shanghai, China , May 26-27, 2013
• Gerald, j.l., Kiridaran, K., and Dennis, W. (2006). Corporate governance quality and market liquidity around quarterly earnings announcements. Available at: afaanz.org.
• Gjolberg, M. (2014). Explaining Regulatory Preferences: CSR, Soft Law, or Hard Law? Insights from a Survey of Nordic Pioneers in CSR. Business and Politics, 13 (2), 1-31.
• Godfrey, P. C. & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21^st Century, Journal of Business Ethics, 70:87–98.
• Gones, M. (2005) ‘The Origin of Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Forces or National Legacies’, Socio- Economic Review, 7, 605–637.
• Green, S. (2005). Sarbanes Oxley and the Board of Directors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jercy.
• Hadani, M., Goranova, M. and Khan, R. (2011). Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1352–1360.
• Hermanson, D.R., and Rittenberg. (2003). Internal Audit and Organizational Governance. (2003, http:/www.Theiia.org).
• Hess, D. and Warren, D.E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Bus. Soc. Rev. 113 (2), 163-197, retrieved from: http://search.proquest. Com/docview/ 43251588? Accountid=14568.
• Hoi, Ch., Wu, Q. and Zhang, H. (2014). Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology.
• Huang, Chi-Jui. (2010) . Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 16 (5) , 641-655.