A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Cognitive, Affective, and Personality Traits on English Foreign Language Learners’ Lexical Knowledge

Biannual Journal of Education Experiences

دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 8، تیر 2022، صفحه 13-34   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Mohammad Rostampour^{* 1}؛ Seyyedeh Mitra Niroomand²

¹Department of English,Abadeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadeh, Iran

²Department of Humanities, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Shiraz, Iran.

چکیده

Abstract

The most affective variables in the process of language learning are related to learners’ emotions, attitudes, and personality; hence, the present study aimed at investigating the possible relationship between emotional intelligence, field dependence/independence cognitive styles, motivation, and lexical knowledge among learners of English as a Foreign Language. Since learners’ affective, cognitive, and personality traits may influence how they receive, perceive, and store vocabulary items in English, investigating such traits to know how they are pertained to the composite and breadth of learners’ vocabulary would be very useful in dealing with teaching vocabulary in a foreign or second language. A number of university Iranian students majoring in English Language Teaching were selected as the participants. Three tests and one questionnaire were employed in this study. Data analysis involved the use of Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple-regression. The results of the data analysis revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between emotional intelligence, motivation, field dependence/independence cognitive styles and vocabulary breadth. Additionally, the results indicated that the three independent variables were effective in predicting learners’ vocabulary breadth. Since the outcomes of the present study showed a credible and meaningful relationship between EFL university learners' emotional intelligence, field dependence/independence cognitive styles, motivation and their vocabulary breadth, language teachers can take personal factors into a more serious consideration in their students’ language learning process.

کلیدواژه‌ها

emotional intelligence؛ field dependence/independence cognitive styles؛ motivation؛ vocabulary breadth؛ lexical knowledge

مراجع

References

- Abdolrezapour, P.  (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 331-339.

- Aitchison, J. (1989). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

- Aki, Ö. (2006). Is emotional intelligence or mental intelligence more important in language learning? Journal of Applied Sciences, 6 (1), 66-70.

- Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (2005). Psychological testing. Prentice Hall of India.

- Artino, A.R., Jr. (2005). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERIC

- Asadollahfam, H., Salimi, A., & Mahmood Pashazadeh, F.  (2012). Emotional intelligence, gender and vocabulary. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 833-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.208

- Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

- Bar-On, R. (2005). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence. In Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Extremera, N. (Eds.). Special issue on emotional intelligence. Psicothema, 17.

- Brown, H. D. (1994). Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 23, 231-244.

- Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Application of the attitude/motivation test battery in Spain. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

- Cameron, L. (2002). Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language. Language Teaching Research, 6 (2), 145-173.

- Channel, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching, 83-96. New York: Longman.

- Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Field independence and ambiguity tolerance as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27-46.

- Csizér, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and effort. Modern Language Journal, 89, 19-36.

- Clark, H., & Roof, K. (1988). Field dependence and strategy use.  Perceptual and motor skills, 66, 303-307.

- Cruickshank, D. R., & Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. K. (2006). The act of teaching. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

- Dabaghi, A., & Goharimehr, N. (2011). The relationship between learning styles of field dependence/independence and integrative/discrete point methods of grammar teaching. World Journal of English Language (1)2, 79-89.

- Duncan, T.G., & Mckeachie, W.J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.

- Fernández Fontecha, A. (2014). Receptive vocabulary knowledge and motivation in CLIL and EFL. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 9, 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2014.2077

- Fitz, R.J. (1970). The differential effects of praise and censure on serial learning as dependent on locus of control and field dependency. Doctoral dissertation, catholic University of America. Dissertation Abstracts International 1971314310B.

- Hazrati-Viari, A., Tayarani Rad, A., & Torabi, S. S. (2012). The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 367-371.

- Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (2), 303-317.

- Hulstijn, J.H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning Journal, 51, 539-558.

- Humaida, I.A.I. (2012). Motivation to learn among English language learners in Sudan. Open Access Scientific Reports, 1, 237. doi:10.4172/scientificreports.237

- Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 255-271.

- Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 53 (3), 399-436.

- Laufer, B., & Paribakht, S.T.  (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies. Effects of language learning contexts. Language Learning Journal, 48(3), 365-391.  

- Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitude, motivation and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123-163.

- Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

- Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

- Nassaji, H. (2001). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Canadian Modern Language Review, 107-135.

- Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. 

- Nation, I.S.P.  (2007). Vocabulary size test (monolingual version).  Victoria University of Wellington. Retrieved February, 24, 2010, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul- nation.aspx.

- Nation, P., & Meara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.). An introduction to applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J., (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.

- Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 52 (3), 513-536.

- Rahnama, M. (2008). Relation between field dependence/ independence, ambiguity tolerance/intolerance and reading comprehension in global and local items.  Unpublished M.A Thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.

- Razmjoo, S.A, Sahragard, R., & Sadri, M. (2009). On the relationship between multiple intelligences, vocabulary learning knowledge and vocabulary learning strategies among the Iranian EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 3, 82-110.

- Richards, J.C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman Group UK Limited.

- Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S.M. (2013). On the correlation between Iranian undergraduate EFL learners’ emotional intelligence, motivation and vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 473-482.

- Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S.M. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitive styles: Are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge? International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2 (1), 52-57.

- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

- Sadeghi, M. (2013). The Impact of achievement motivation on vocabulary learning in intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(10), 206-213.

- Saklofske, D.H., Austin, E.J., & Minski, P. S. (2003). Factor structure and validity of a trait emotional intelligence measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 702-721.

- Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.

- Saville-Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly, 18 (2), 199-219.

- Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.). Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

- Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Claphan, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18 (1), 55-58.

- Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L.E., Haggerty, D.J., Cooper, J.T., & Golden, C.J. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167-177.

- Seal, B.D. (1991). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or foreign language. Boston. Heinle and Heinle.

- Shakiba, S., & Barani, Gh. (2011). The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Language Proficiency of Iranian High School Students.  Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1603-1607.

- Skourdi, S., Rahimi, A., & Bagheri, M.S. (2014). The relationship between emotional intelligence and vocabulary knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral sciences, 98, 1785-1793.

- Vali-Mohammadi, A., & Bagheri, M.S. (2011). Relationship between emotional intelligence, motivation and the vocabulary size of EFL students. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(4) 92-119.

- Witkin, H.A., & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.

- Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Oltman, P.K., Goodenough, D.R., Friedman, F., Owen, D.R., & Raskin, E. (1977). Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in academic evolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 192-211.

- Witkin, H. A., Raskin E., Oltman, P. K., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

- Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent earning styles and L2 acquisition. The weekly column. Article 102.

- Zhang, L. J., & Annual, S. B. (2008). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension. RELC Journal, 39 (1), 51-76.