Developing Interactive Tasks in Iranian EFL Students’ Self-Monitoring, Self-Regulation, and Willingness to Communicate Using ICT Tools

Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning

دوره 1، شماره 4، اسفند 2022، صفحه 79-107   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jntell.2022.695422

نویسندگان

Fereshte Abkhoo؛ Roya Baharlooei^* ؛ Hadi Salehi؛ Omid Tabatabaei

English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

چکیده

This mixed-methods design study has been conducted to gain insights into the developing interactive tasks in Iranian EFL students in terms of self-monitoring, self-regulation, and willingness to communicate within the educational system. The study collected data using the questionnaires measuring self-monitoring scale (SMS), self-regulated language learning scale (SRLLS), and willingness to communicate (WTC) to compute the differences in interactive scores of 40 students in an experimental group with the interactive scores of 40 students in a control group. The study adopted a qualitative interview-based methodology with EFL learners who took part in the investigation and the extent to which they could achieve and receive the instruction with significant findings. Accordingly, the study as personality assessment developed the semi-structured interviews with 40 students in an experimental group and 40 students in a control group to explore students’ motivational beliefs and their attitudes towards interactive tasks influencing their performance in learning and assisting them to communicate successfully. As the results of the study, using the independent sample t-test, the interactive tasks could facilitate suitable training and professional development. The major finding of the study was related to the influence of interactive activities in improving positive attitudes towards interactive tasks and was beneficial to language learning. Based on the attitudinal analysis as the results of this study, using the Transcribed Interview Sample with coding (an extract) clearly identified that students with interactive tasks mainly outperformed those with regular instruction. Furthermore, the findings of the research indicated that students’ achievement was improved in terms of their motivation, autonomy, and empowerment as contributed to their learning. However, this study revealed that teachers could increase the academically collaborative talk as well as social-emotional behavior of students in their teaching and learning environments to share feeling safe, taking risks, and enjoy constructive effects.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

Interactive task؛ Self-monitoring strategy؛ Self-regulation strategy؛ Willingness to    communicate strategy

مراجع

Al-Zahrani, M. Y., & Al-Bargi, A. (2017). The impact of teacher questioning in creating interaction in EFL: A discourse analysis. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 135-150.

Barjesteh, H., Vaseghi, R., & Neissi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate across different context-and receiver-types. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 47-54.

Bolino, M. C., Long, D., & Turnley, W. (2016). Impression management in organizations:Critical questions, answers, and areas for future research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 377-406.

Bono, J. E., & Vey, M. A. (2007). Personality and emotional performance: Extraversion, neuroticism, and self-monitoring. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 177- 192.

Brown, H. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson, New York: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Cameron, C. E., & Morrison, F. J. (2011). Teacher activity orienting predicts preschoolers' academic and self-regulatory skills. Early Education & Development, 22(4), 620-648.

Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly 48. 789–814

Cazan, A. M., & Aniei, M. (2010). Motivation, learning strategies and acadmic adjustement. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, 1(1), 61-69

Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context-specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL micro analytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012, 1-19. doi:10.1155/2012/428639.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Denscombe, M. (2003). The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects (second ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ennis, R. P., Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2018). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction: Self-monitoring in an elementary resource room. Preventing School Failure, 62, 176–189. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2017.1408055.

Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M. J., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Self-regulation, effortful control, and their socioemotional correlates. Handbook of emotion regulation, 2, 157-172.

Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26, 1243-1260.

Han, Y. (2014). Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Patterns of use among college students. (Published doctoral dissertation). Auburn University. Alabama.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson, New York: Longman.

Hitotuzi, N. (2005). Teacher Talking Time in the EFL Classroom Tiempo de participación oral del profesor en el aula de inglés como lengua extranjera. Profile.6 (1), 97-106.

Kogani Baharvand, P., Rezaee, A., & Valadi, A. (2015). The relationship between language learner‘s willingness to communicate and their oral language proficiency to gender differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistic & English Litrature,4(5), 147- 153.

Le, V. C., & Rendaya, W. A. (2017). Teachers' English proficiency and classroom language use: A conversation analysis study. RELC Journal, 48(1), 67-81.

Little, B. R. (2011). Personal projects and free traits: Personality and motivation reconsidered. Retrieved July 07, 2012, from http://ww  w.brianrlittle. com/articles/p ersonal-projec ts-and-freetraits/# more-196.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2013). Willingness to communicate and action control, System, 38,161-171.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control, System, 38, 161-171.

McClelland, M.M. & Cameron, C.E. (2012). Self-regulation in early childhood: Improving conceptual clarity and developing ecologically valid measures. Child Development Perspectives 6 (1), 136-142.

Meloy, F, A. (2009). Self-Regulated Learning, Academic Outcomes, and the Student Learning Experience in a Second-Degree Accelerated Baccalaureate Nursing Program. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, college of nursing and health professions, Pennsylvania.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: Sage Publications.

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). Designing a Tool for Measuring the Interrelationships between L2 WTC, Confidence, Beliefs, Motivation, and Context. Second Language Learning and Teaching, 19-37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_2.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2004). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Fan, X., Chiu, Y. J., & You, W. (2007). The contribution of the Responsive Classroom Approach on children's academic achievement: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 45(4), 401-421.

Rock, M.L. (2005). Use of Strategic Self-monitoring to Enhance Academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without exceptionalities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7 (1), 3- 16.

Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualising strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33 (1), 92–98.

Savignon, S. J. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: What's ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 207-220.

Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Härtel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I. (2016). Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 125-139.

Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380.

Sosik, J. J., & Dinger, S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 134-153.

Todd, A.W., Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (1999). Self-monitoring and self- recruited praise: Effects on problem behavior, academic engagement, and work completion in a typical classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 66- 76

Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education. From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Lier, L. (2001). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.

Viswambharan, A. P. & Priya, K. R. (2016). Documentary Analysis as a Qualitative Methodology to Explore Disaster Mental Health: Insights from Analyzing Documentary on Communal Riots. Qualitative Research, 16(1) 43–59.

Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualizing classroom interactional competence. Novitas-Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1-14.

Wang, Q. (2010). Classroom Interaction and Language Output. English Language Teaching. 3(2), 175-189.

Wilmot, M. P., DeYoung, C. G., Stillwell, D., & Kosinski, M. (2016). Self-monitoring and the metatraits. Journal of Personality, 84, 335-347.

Wolf, H., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2009). Self-monitoring and personality: A behavioural-genetic study. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 25-29.

Zarrianabadi, N & Abdi, R. (2011). Willingness to communicate and language learning orientations in Iranian EFL context. International Education Studies, 4(4), 206-214.

Zimmerman, B. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147.

Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed-Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262.