تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,560 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,801,253 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,843,894 |
Cultural Geomorphology as an Attraction to Promote Geotourism (Case Study: Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geoconservation Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 8، بهمن 2022، صفحه 292-302 اصل مقاله (1.04 M) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30486/gcr.2022.1967183.1114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maryam Daemi1؛ Neda Torabi Farsani* 2؛ Reza Khoshraftar3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Museum and Tourism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2Department of Museum and Tourism; Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3Department of Geography, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface topography is involved with cultural values in some destinations, and Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties constitute good examples. In this paper, we present the primary geosites with cultural geomorphology values and aims to investigate the appropriate solutions for promoting geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology. Thematic analysis as a qualitative method and observation was used, and the results demonstrated that Neyshabur and Firuzeh counties include 19 geosites with cultural geomorphology values. We propose the use of marketing, government support, research and identification, local empowerment, and development of new products and services to offer to tourists with geo-themes as key solutions to promote geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geoheritage؛ Geotourism؛ Cultural geomorphology؛ Myth | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties include many geotourism attractions, which, along with their cultural, historical, and literary values, can be suitable destinations for all types of tourists. This region has experienced many changes over the centuries due to its geographical location, although it is still unknown and abandoned. Geodiversity of the region with the stories and myths that exist mostly in the oral tradition make these regions appropriate for geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology. It is noteworthy that this new geotourism marketing sector can be a solution to preserve these myths and oral traditions.
Cultural geomorphology is the study of a land's geomorphological components besides the landscape's cultural features and its interaction with cultural heritag (archaeology, literature, history, architecture, etc.). Everywhere where geosites are involved with the folk culture of local people, it can be said that the geosite has a high potential for cultural geomorphology (Khoshraftar 2009a, b). The Maestrazgo Cultural Park in Spain, the Araripe UNESCO Global Geopark in Brazil, Yellowstone National Park in the USA, and The Dolaucothi Gold Mines in Wales, England are good examples (Edwards & i Coit 1996).
This study has two major purposes: 1) to identify primary geosites with cultural geomorphology and, 2), to investigate appropriate solutions to promote geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology. According to the National Vision Plan of Iran, promoting geotourism and diversification of tourism forms and development of tourism services and products are strategies and policies of tourism development designed to overcome the challenges related to the tourism industry in Iran. We can take a step towards achieving these goals by promoting geotourism and mine tourism, with emphasis on cultural geomorphology heritage sites in Neyshabur and Firuzeh counties.
Cultural Geomorphology The concept of cultural geomorphology consists of two parts: geomorphology and culture. There are many definitions of geomorphology, a key one being that of the International Association of Geomorphologists (IAG), “Geomorphology is the interdisciplinary and systematic study of landforms, their landscapes and the earth surface processes that create and change them” (IAG 2013).
Moreover, UNESCO defines culture as “the set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group, that encompasses, not only art and literature, but lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions, and beliefs” (UNESCO 2001: p. 3).
In recent decades, the concept of cultural geomorphology has emerged in academic research (Panizza & Piacente 2009; Sahariah et al. 2013). Cultural geomorphology has been a part of the activities of geography, which investigate the natural and human aspects of landscapes (Sahariah et al. 2013).
Caseldine and Turney (2010) noted that there are internal interrelationships between geomorphic landscapes and the development of material and immaterial aspects of human activities in many places and indicated that the appearance and different cultural changes have been developed based on the time scales of thousands of years. The geomorphic landscape may come from the distant past for different reasons, such as strangeness (e.g., South China Karst), grandeur (e.g., Mount Fuji in Japan), color and contrast (e.g., badlands colored landscapes), geomythology (e.g., Takht-e Soleymān–Takab in Iran; Khoshraftar & Torabi Farsani, 2019, and the Devils Tower in Wyoming, USA) have been important to people and have formed a part of people's culture for many centuries (Khoshrahtar 2009a, b).
In recent decades, such sites have been called by terms such as geosite, geotope, geoscience sites, and are better known than other geoheritage sites. Reynard (2004) argued that geosites are important in terms of scientific, cultural-historical, aesthetic, and economic-social aspects.
Panizza and Piacente (2009) were the first researchers to use the concept of cultural geomorphology and they defined it as a field in which the geomorphological features of land include the cultural components of the landscape and its interaction with cultural heritage such as archaeology, history, architecture, etc. These authors argued that in cultural geomorphology studies there are five steps and describing geological and geomorphic processes is the first step. Pereira and Martins (2016) believed that cultural geomorphology strives to support geomorphological heritage from the viewpoint of cultural landscape related to history, literature, architecture, archeology, intangible cultural heritage, etc. to illustrate the geosites’ values. Reynard and Giusti (2018) demonstrated that nature and human culture play axial role in developing cultural landscapes and geologic features or landscapes has also a vital role in cultural or historical events.
In regional studies, Knight and Harrison (2013) considered the relationship between geomorphology, geoheritage sites, and cultural values in Cornwall, UK. Serrano and González-Amuchastegui (2020), through inventory and assessment of geomorphosites in the north of Spain, illustrated that territorial tourism management planners should pay equal attention to natural (geoheritage sites) and cultural components. Soares & Bateira (2020) studied the cultural geomorphology of Douro River, Portugal, presenting geological and geomorphological characteristics in relation to the economic, social, and cultural evolution of the area. de Tarso Castro et al. (2021) suggested that geo-mining heritage sites that involved cultural values are appropriate areas for promoting cultural geomorphology.
Ferreira (2022) studied cultural geomorphology values of a territory located at Arada and S. Macário mountain areas and the valleys of the rivers Sul and Vouga (municipality of São Pedro do Sul), Portugal, through geographic information technologies and the results illustrated that geoheritage can be applied as a complementary tourist resource and cultural geomorphology values can improve public perception of natural and cultural heritage in depopulation and rural abandonment. Lajczak and Zarychta (2022) introduced Krakow, Poland, as a geotourism destination with cultural geomorphology values such as an old salt mine in Wieliczka town, underground museums etc.
Undoubtedly, geomorphologists who study cultural geomorphology can provide a balanced approach to identifying, preserving, and protecting valuable landscapes and geosites at the local, national and global levels. At first, cultural geomorphology researchers emphasized the importance of preserving cultural values on geomorphological sites, and in recent decades, geotourism has been paying particular attention to the aesthetic aspects as well as cultural values in geoheritage sites.
It is noteworthy that the topic of cultural geomorphology is a current consideration in Iran, and here we explore the inventory, identification, and qualitative description of cultural geomorphology of geosites in Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties to introduce a new theme in promoting geotourism of Iran.
Methodology Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties (Fig. 1) are selected as case studies. They are in Razavi Khorasan Province in north-eastern Iran. Firuzeh is known as a mine tourism destination because of its turquoise mines. Neyshabur is one of the most famous cultural and literary capitals of Iran and the tombs of some poets such as Omar Khayyam, Attar of Nishapur, etc. are located there. In addition, the tomb of Mohammad Ghaffari, better known as Kamal-ol-Molk, an Iranian painter, is in Neyshabur. Figure 1. Geographical location of Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran. Regional geology includes the turquoise mines, said to be the most famous and high-quality turquoise in Iran, fossil sites, salt mines, and geological sites. This region experienced historical events such as the migration of Imam Reza-the eighth Imam of Twelver Shias- to this area and the Mongol invasion of Persia and the devastation of Neyshabur.
Moreover, there are many literary stories such as the poems of Shahnameh, long epic poems written by the Persian poet Ferdowsi, oral traditions, myths, and cultural and historical stories involved with geoheritage sites. In this study, we strive to use these stories and myths as interpretative tools for geological education and to make them more attractive.
For this, we designed an interview form which included semi-structured questions. The content validity of the interview form was evaluated by the CVR formula, in which Ne is the number of experts indicating "essential" and N is the total number of experts. The numeric value of the content validity ratio is determined by the Lawshe Table (Wilson et al., 2012).
CVR = (Ne - N/2)/(N/2) (1)
A content validity ratio of 0.75 indicated a good validity of the interview form. Interviews were conducted by tour guides, local communities, geologists and experts in the fields of geography, geomorphology, culture and history and the data reached saturation point at the 13th interview. It is worth mentioning that because of the Coronavirus wpidemic, phone and social media interviews were used as well as field trips and face to face interviews. The data was collected from spring 2021 to autumn 2021. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis (open and axial coding), as one of the best known methods in qualitative research.
Results The thematic analysis identified that 19 primary geosites with cultural geomorphology potential (Table 1): Yekeh Kūh , Shotor Sang Rock (Fig. 2A), Pir Hassan Chupan Rock, Kūh-e Do Barādar (Dual rocky peaks), Āsheq Kūh And Māhrokh Kūh , Hussain Asghar Shrine Erosion Stones, Quchgar Mountain Dizbad Rock located in Nohesar Dizbad castle, Takht Hulagu or Takht Palang, Si sar Cave, EBRĀHĪM B. ADHAM Cave or Haft Ghar (Seven Caves), Kelidar leopard Cave (Palang Kelidar cave), Neyshabur salt cave, Alaodole salt cave and Amarlou salt cave (Fig. 2B), Turquoise Mine (Fig. 2C), Si Sar Lake, Cave Spring of Hossein Asghar shrine, Garmab Thermal Spring, Nohasar Dizbad Spring, Kahlan Spring, Deh Sorkh Spring. Figure 2. The primary geosites with cultural geomorphology potentials in Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties. A: Shotor Sang Rock; B: salt cave in Neyshabur; C: Turquoise Mine. (source: Google Maps). Table 1 illustrates the geological processes and the cultural values, myths, and stories related with each geosite.
Analysis of the data indicates five appropriate solutions (themes) to promote cultural geomorphology: marketing, government support, research and identification of geological heritage sites, local empowerment, and development of new products and services to offer to tourists with geo-themes to promote geotourism (Table 2). Table 2. Appropriate solutions to promote geotourism with emphasis on cultural geomorphology obtained from interviews
The experts recommended seven sub-themes for the marketing strategy as follows: organizing a pilot geotourism tour with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology heritage sites by nature tourism agencies; marketing and advertising in the field of geotourism with an emphasis on mines and cultural geomorphology; introduction of geosites through Iran's Minister of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts; introducing the geotourism potential of the region through social media, leaflets, brochures, etc.; holding conferences, meeting, and photo exhibitions related to geotourism and cultural geomorphology heritage sites in the region; holding high-quality geotourism tours and benefiting from word-of-mouth marketing; finding a suitable target market for mine tourism and geotourism with an emphasis on the cultural geomorphology of the region.
In addition, government support for geotourism with an emphasis on the cultural geomorphology theme could support the private sectors of the region to create geotourism infrastructure and facilities, invest in the necessary infrastructure themselves, provide permits to turn abandoned or semi-active mines into mining museums, mining parks, eco-museums, new ideas that fit the cultural geomorphology of the region, and voluntary cooperation and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for sustainable tourism, education, culturization, environmental protection and promoting geotourism. The experts mentioned that research and identification of geological heritage sites with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology are needed in Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties: to identify the geological heritage in the region and provide protection strategies, such as the fossils of Qoruneh and Baqi villages; to identify inactive and abandoned mines under the supervision of the Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration of Iran to turn them into mining museums, mining parks, ecomuseums or salt hotels; and to identify existing local stories, myths, narratives and legends and teach them to guides and local people as a marketing tool. Further analysis demonstrated that local empowerment can play an axial role in promoting geotourism in the region. Empowering local communities regarding communication with tourists and creating geo-products, introducing the geological heritage sites of the region to local communities, educating local people to promote geotourism with an emphasis on geosites with cultural geomorphology values, and educating local tour guides to promote geotourism with an emphasis on geosites with cultural geomorphology values.
When a new market emerges in a region, the destination needs innovation to stay alive. Hence, the experts emphasized development of new products and services to offer to tourists with geo-themes. They suggested using salt mines in geotourism and health and wellness sectors and turning them into salt hotels, producing geo-products according to cultural components and geotourism elements of the region, and developing geotours with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology values. Discussion Our results support the earlier study by Ovissi et al. (2017) on the historical values of the Turquoise Mine in Neyshabur and. Moreover, some authors such as de Tarso Castro et al., (2021) and Lajczak and Zarychta (2022) in their studies emphasized mines as landscapes with cultural geomorphology values and our results provide some support for their research. In addition, Pereira and Martins (2016) introduced Kelidar Leopard Cave as a geosite with a literary value which is related to the novel Kelidar, written by Mahmoud Dowlatabadi and translated into different languages. Their context was ways in which geomorphological heritage can be explored from the viewpoint of cultural landscape related to history, literature, architecture, archaeology, intangible cultural heritage, etc.
Conclusion Our results support the view that Neyshabur and Firuzeh Counties in the northeast of Iran have great geodiversity, and geotourists can enjoy volcanic mountains, mechanical erosion in geo-heritage sites, karst formations, caves, springs, mines (salt mines and Turquoise Mine) and karst caves. According to the analysis of interview forms and observations, 19 primary geosites with cultural geomorphology values were recognized. In identifying geosites with cultural geomorphology values, we hope to open a window into promoting geotourism and extend the geotourism literature.
At present, there are not enough infrastructure and tourism facilities for geotourists in the region. Therefore, we plan to suggest some appropriate solutions to promote geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology. To promote geotourism with an emphasis on cultural geomorphology, we need marketing, government support, research and identification, local empowerment, and development of new products and services to offer to tourists with geo-themes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Caseldine CJ & Turney C (2010). The bigger picture: towards integrating palaeoclimate and environmental data with a history of societal change. Journal of Quaternary Science. 25(1): 88–93.
de Tarso Castro P, Nascimento ST & de Paula SF (2021). Classification of geo-mining heritage based on anthropogenic geomorphology. Journal of the Geological Survey of Brazil. 4: S1.
Edwards JA & i Coit JCL (1996). Mines and quarries: Industrial heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 23(2): 341–363.
Ferreira R (2022). Cultural geomorphology and geotourism in the digital information age. Using geographic information technologies to support natural heritage valorisation in São Pedro do Sul municipality, 10th International Conference on Geomorphology, Coimbra, Portugal, 12–16 Sep 2022, ICG2022-645, https://doi.org/10.5194/icg2022-645, 2022.
IAG (International association of geomorphologists) (2013). Geomorphology. Available at: http://www.geomorph.org/ (accessed: 3 September 2022).
Khoshraftar R (2009a). Geotourism and reasons for attracting people to geosites. The Second National Conference of Geographical Sciences, Payame Noor University of Urmia, Iran. 7-8 October, 2009.
Khoshraftar R (2009b). Cultural geomorphology: the role of karst geosites in beliefs and folklore (case study, Zanjan province), Researches in Earth Sciences. 9(34): 129–144.
Khoshraftar R & Torabi Farsani N (2019). Geomythology: an approach for attracting geotourists (case study: Takht-e Soleymān–Takab world heritage sites). Geoheritage. 11: 1879–1888.
Knight J &Harrison S (2013). ‘A land history of men’: The intersection of geomorphology, culture and heritage in Cornwall, southwest England. Applied Geography 42: 186–194.
Lajczak A & Zarychta R (2022). Selected issues of geoheritage, cultural geomorphology and geotourism in Krakow city and surrounding areas, Poland (No. ICG2022-696). Copernicus Meetings.
Ovissi M, Yazdi M & Ghorbani M (2017). The Persian turquoise mining at Neyshabur mine in historical times. Geography. 14(51): 87–99 (in Persian).
Panizza M & Piacente S (2009). Cultural geomorphology and geodiversity. In Reynard E, Paola Coratza GRB (eds), Geomorphosites (pp. 35–48). Pfeil, München.
Pereira AC & Martins BMSC (2016). Interactions between geomorphological heritage and cultural landscape of Serra do Alvão: the perspective of cultural geomorphology. Vegueta: Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia. 16: 437–459.
Reynard EG (2004). Geosite, In Goudie, AS (ed), Encyclopedia of Geomorphology (Vol. 1, p 440). Routledge, London and New York.
Reynard EG & Giusti C (2018). The landscape and the cultural value of geoheritage. In Reynard EG, Vrilha J (eds), Geoheritage (pp. 147–166). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Sahariah D, Singha K, Bora DK, Kundu S, Das T, Sen S, Das K, Mili B, Baruah J, Sarma K & Saikia A (2013). Majuli at the crossroads: A study of cultural geomorphology. Space and Culture, India. 1(2): 12–20.
Serrano E & González-Amuchastegui MJ (2020). Cultural heritage, landforms, and integrated territorial heritage: the close relationship between Tufas, cultural remains, and landscape in the Upper Ebro Basin (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain). Geoheritage. 12(4): 1–18.
Soares L & Bateira C (2020). Geomorphology in a World Cultural Heritage Site: The City of Porto. In Vieira G, Zêzere J, Mora C (eds) Landscapes and Landforms of Portugal. World Geomorphological Landscapes (pp. 281-293). Springer, Cham.
UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2001). Cultures. Available at: https://policytoolbox.iiep.unesco.org/glossary/cultures/. Accessed: 3 September 2022.
Wilson FR, Pan W & Schumsky DA (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 45(3): 197-210. doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 403 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 467 |