Evaluating the Efficiency of In-Service Programs on Iranian EFL Teachers’ Knowledge Base: A Delphi Study

Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice

دوره 15، شماره 30، آذر 2022، صفحه 222-252   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/jal.2022.704104

نویسندگان

Maryam Mahmoudi¹؛ Mojgan Rashtchi^{* 2}؛ Gholam-Reza Abbasian³

¹Ph.D., Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

²Associate Professor, TEFL Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

³Associate Professor, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

The present study investigated high school English language teachers’ perspectives on the usefulness of In-service Education and Training (INSET) classes on their Knowledge Base (KB). Three rounds of the Delphi study were designed: one qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and two quantitative ones. Twenty-nine teachers were selected based on purposive sampling. The criterion for sample selection was teachers’ participation in the INSET classes held by the Education and Training Organization of Guilan Province. The teachers were familiar with the Prospects and Vision textbook series and agreed to participate in the study. After conducting semi-structured interviews, common issues related to the teachers’ KB were extracted using MAXQDA version 12. Then, based on EFL teachers’ responses to the interview questions in the first Round (R1), the second Round (R2) was conducted, resulting in the development of a 27-item questionnaire on a five-point Likert-type scale addressing teachers’ KB to which the participants responded. The third Round (R3) was performed with the same questionnaire and participants to verify their views stated in R2. Paired samples t-tests were used to analyze the data in R2 and R3. The results showed conformity among teachers’ responses to the interviews and R2 and R3 questions. Teachers expected the classes to be more practical, focusing on step-by-step instruction and planning to enhance their pedagogical, technological, and content knowledge bases. The findings suggest that appropriate INSET programs need to be developed and implemented to promote teachers’ quality of practice and, thus, students’ learning.

کلیدواژه‌ها

in-service education and training (INSET)؛ knowledge base؛ Delphi study؛ high school English teachers؛ pedagogical knowledge؛ technological pedagogical؛ content knowledge

مراجع

Aharony, N., & Bronstein, J. (2013).  A Delphi investigation into the future of e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 911–914. http://dx.doi.org/110.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.170

Al Ofi, A.H. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous professional development programs for English language teachers. International Journal of Education and Research, 10 (2), 89–106.

Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009                            

Banegas, D. L. (2009). Content knowledge in teacher education: Where professionalization lies, ELTED, 12, 44–51.

Brad, R. S. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1 (6), 56–67. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1609406915621381 ijqm.sagepub.com

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36 (2), 81–106. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0261444803001903.

Brewer, E. W. (2011). Evaluation models for evaluating educational programs. In V.C.X. Wang (Ed). Assessing and evaluating adult learning in career and technical education (pp.129–153). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980).  Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing, Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.  

Cimer, S. O., Cakir, I., & Cimer, A. (2010). Teachers’ views on the effectiveness of in‐service courses on the new curriculum in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903506689

Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17, 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401

Coskun, A., & Daloglu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English language teacher education program through Peacock’s model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.2

Cox, S., & Graham, C.R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. Tech Trends, 53, 60–69.

Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective, PIQ,26 (2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143

Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service English language teachers. International Education Studies, 9 (5), 18-27. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18

Fan, C.K., & Cheng, A. (2006). Study to identify the training needs of life insurance sales representatives in Taiwan using the Delphi approach, International. Journal of Training. 10, 212–226.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2006.00255.x

Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research, SAGE, 1(4), 1–8.

http://doi.og/ 10.1177/2158244014529773.

Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S, (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering And Science, 3(4), 8-13.

Habibi, A., Firouzi Jahantigh, F., & Sarafrazic, A. (2015). Fuzzy Delphi technique for forecasting and screening items. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 5 (2), 130–143.

http://doi.org/10.5958/2249 7307.2015.00036.5

Hashemian, M., & Azadi, Gh. (2014). EFL teachers’ understanding of the teaching portions of INSET programs. RALs, 5(1), 62–76. 

Hung, B. P. (2016). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary school teachers of English in Vietnam. International Journal of  English Linguistics, 6 (4), 96–103. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n4p96

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT  Education Conference (InSITE), 597-607.

Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2009). Evaluation and learning in language programmes. In K. Knapp., B. Seidlh., & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), Handbook of language communication and learning (pp. 663–694). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Kim, H., Choi, H., Han, J., & So, H. (2012). Enhancing teachers’ ICT capacity for the 21^st century learning environment: Three cases of teacher education in Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 965–982. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.805

Khanjani, A., Vahdani, F., Jafarigohar, M. (2017). EFL teacher education in Iran: Does it promote trainers’ pedagogical content knowledge? Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 159–186.

 

 Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.                       

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. In R. Thyagarajan (Ed.), ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book (pp. 2-7). New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.

Liu, S., Liu, H., Yu, Y., Li, Y., & Wen, T. (2014). TPACK: A new dimension to   EFL teachers’ PCK. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 681–693.

Llosa, L., & Slayton, J. (2009). Using program evaluation to inform and improve the education of young English language learners in US schools. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808095522

Mahmoodi, M., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, Gh. (2019). Evaluation of In-service teacher training program in Iran: Focus on the Kirkpatrick model, Education and Self Development, 14(4), 20–38. http://doi.org/10.26907/esd14.4.03

Mahmoudi, M., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, Gh. (2021). Efficacy of In-service education and training (INSET) courses in improving EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(1), 31-54.

Mcintyre-Hite, L. (2016). A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency-based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1, 157–166. http://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1029

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mouza, C., & Wong, W. (2009). Studying classroom practice: Case development for professional learning in technology integration. Journal Technology &Teacher Education, 17(2), 175–201. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26963/.

Oliveira, L. C. (2015). A model of teaching knowledge for nonnative English- speaking teachers. EntreLínguas, Araraquara, 1(1), 11–23.

Önal, A. (2019). An exploratory study on pre-service teachers’ reflective reports of their video-recorded microteaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 806–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631520

Pawlak, M. (2011). The role of in-service training for language teachers in the domain of language competence. GLOTTODIDACTICA, An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(1) 21–30.

http://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2011.38.2  

Peacock, M. (2009). The evaluation of foreign-language-teacher education programs. Language Teaching Research, 13 (3), 259–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809104698

Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University  

            Press.

Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York, NY: Garland.         

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects – introduction to the special issue. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1487–1490. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002

Sahragard, R., & Saberi, L. (2018).  The knowledge base of pre-service and in-service Iranian EFL teachers in teacher education programs. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 445–466.

Schulman, L.S. (1986). Educational researcher. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4–14.                    

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre- service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

Somerville, J. A. (2008). Effective use of the Delphi process in research: Its characteristics, strengths, and limitations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University], Corvallis, OR.

Tarone, E., & Allwright, D. (2005). Second language teacher learning and student second language learning: Shaping the knowledge base. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education international perspective (pp. 5-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.        

Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. (1996). Computer based Delphi processes. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the     oracle: The Delphi technique and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley.

Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 14–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4