Sequential Parts Analysis Using Local Optimization Method for Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Generator

Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering

مقاله 21، دوره 18، شماره 1، خرداد 2024، صفحه 253-263   

نوع مقاله: Reseach Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30486/mjee.2024.1998536.1290

نویسندگان

Nur Afiqah Mostaman^{* 1}؛ Erwan Sulaiman²؛ Mahyuzie Jenal¹

¹Department of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Malaysia.

²Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electric and Electronic, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, Malaysia

چکیده

The Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Generator (HEFSG) has gained significant popularity in recent times owing to its relatively simple remarkably efficient topology. To optimize the performance of the generator, recent advancements and emerging patterns in mathematical modeling and software simulation, along with the utilization of optimization techniques, have facilitated the development of a novel methodology for electrical machine design. This study investigates the configuration and optimization of a Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Generator, focusing on the rotor, armature coil, and field excitation. The optimization process involves multiple sequences for each component, employing the Local Optimization Method as an iterative approach to determine the optimal sequence that yields the highest output efficiency. Through the investigation of six rotor sequences, two armature coil sequences, and two field excitation coil sequences, a detailed optimization process was conducted. Consequently, the final output voltage of the HEFSG gains a 1.10% increment of voltage compared to the initial outcomes. Several sequences have influenced the output voltage performance of the generator during the optimization process. Therefore, modifications to the design of the arrangement contribute to the expansion of the operational range of the generator.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Optimization؛ HEFSG؛ Generator؛ FSG؛ Rotor؛ Armature coil؛ Field Excitation Coil and LOM

مراجع

• Reddy Salkuti, “Energy Storage Technologies for Smart Grid: A Comprehensive Review,” Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, 2020.
• S. Hafez et al., “Energy Efficiency in Sustainable Buildings: A Systematic Review with Taxonomy, Challenges, Motivations, Methodological Aspects, Recommendations, and Pathways for Future Research,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 45. Elsevier Ltd, Jan. 01, 2023.
• Zygierewicz and Lucia. S. Sanz, “Renewable Energy Directive Revision of Directive (EU) 2018/2001,” 2018.
• Gielen, F. Boshell, D. Saygin, M. D. Bazilian, N. Wagner, and R. Gorini, “The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 24, pp. 38–50, Apr. 2019.
• Gör and E. Kurt, “Preliminary studies of a new permanent magnet generator (PMG) with the axial and radial flux morphology,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 7005–7018, 2016.
• Djebarri, J. F. Charpentier, F. Scuiller, and M. Benbouzid, “Design methodology of permanent magnet generators for fixed-pitch tidal turbines with overspeed power limitation strategy,” Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2020.
• Dmitrievskii, V. Prakht, and V. Kazakbaev, “Design optimization of a permanent-magnet flux-switching generator for direct-drive wind turbines,” Energies (Basel), vol. 12, no. 19, Sep. 2019.
• X. Fang, Y. Wang, J. X. Shen, and Z. W. Huang, “Design and Analysis of a Novel Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Integrated-Starter-Generator,” 2008.
• Limouchi, S. Abbas Taher, and B. Ganji, “Power and Frequency Control of Active Generator used for Smart Grid Applications,” Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, 2020.
• Hamidizadeh, N. Alatawneh, R. R. Chromik, and D. A. Lowther, “Comparison of Different Demagnetization Models of Permanent Magnet in Machines for Electric Vehicle Application,” IEEE Trans Magn, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2–5, 2016.
• Sjökvist, “Demagnetization Studies on Permanent Magnets Experiments,” Dissertation, p. 43, 2014.
• Faiz and H. Nejadi-Koti, “Demagnetization Fault Indexes in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors-An Overview,” IEEE Trans Magn, vol. 52, no. 4, 2016.
• Faiz, “Demagnetization Fault Indexes in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors — An Overview,” vol. 52, no. 4, 2016.
• A. Mirnikjoo, K. Abbaszadeh, and S. E. Abdollahi, “Multiobjective Design Optimization of a Double-Sided Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Generator for Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 6640–6649, Aug. 2021.
• Schaarup and T. Krogh, “Guidelines for design of wind,” Proc. Ris¯ Vinddag, pp. 5–9, 2001.
• Ali, E. Sulaiman, and R. Aziz, “Review of Double Stator Flux switching machines with various arrangements of excitation sources,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 4393–4410, 2021.
• Zhao, H. Wang, and L. Xiao, “Investigation of fault-tolerant capability of five-phase doubly salient electromagnetic generator,” IET Electr Power Appl, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 80–93, Jan. 2015.
• Ghaheri, E. Afjei, and H. Torkaman, “Design optimization of a novel linear transverse flux switching permanent magnet generator for direct drive wave energy conversion,” Renew Energy, vol. 198, pp. 851–860, Oct. 2022.
• Prakht, V. Dmitrievskii, V. Kazakbaev, and M. N. Ibrahim, “Comparison between rare-earth and ferrite permanent magnet flux-switching generators for gearless wind turbines,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1365–1369, Dec. 2020.
• Li et al., “Generating performance of a tubular permanent magnet linear generator for application on free-piston engine generator prototype with wide-ranging operating parameters,” Energy, vol. 278, Sep. 2023.
• Ullah, A. Selema, and F. Khan, “Design and comparative analysis of dual rotor wound field excited flux switching generator for household DC microgrid system with rooftop wind turbine,” Appl Energy, vol. 357, Mar. 2024.
• Geng et al., “Magnetic field analysis and performance optimization of hybrid excitation generators for vehicles,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 52, Aug. 2022.
• Wang, S. Liu, Z. Yang, and S. Dong, “Perspective on Development of Piezoelectric Micro-Power Generators,” Nanoenergy Advances, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–100, Apr. 2023.
• Li et al., “Performance comparison of electromagnetic generators based on different circular magnet arrangements,” Energy, vol. 258, Nov. 2022.
• Zhu, C. Liu, K. Wang, Y. Hu, and Y. Ning, “Theoretical and experimental analyses of a hybrid excitation synchronous generator with integrated brushless excitation,” IET Electr Power Appl, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 258–267, Apr. 2016.
• Chen, Y. Wang, and Y. Xia, “A High Power Density Partitioned Stator Compound Modulation Hybrid Excitation Generator for Special Vehicles,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Dec. 2023, pp. 1032–1037.
• G. Durakova, A. L. Bogoeva, and A. P. Krasteva, “Study of a linear generator with permanent magnets converting sea wave energy into electricity Study of a linear generator with permanent magnets c onverting sea wave energy into electricity,” 2020.
• Shi, J. An, and W. Zhang, “Topology Comparison Study of Five-Phase Wound-Field Doubly Salient Fault Tolerant Generators,” 2019.
• Wang, K. Wang, Y. D. Guo, J. Li, and F. Li, “Improvement of Output Power for AC Hybrid Excitation Brushless Generator with Novel Consequent-pole Rotor,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Dec. 2023, pp. 5239–5244.
• Gu, Z. Zhang, L. Sun, and L. Yu, “Magnetic Field Enhancement Characteristic of an Axially Parallel Hybrid Excitation DC Generator,” IEEE Trans Magn, vol. 57, no. 2, Feb. 2021.
• Li, L. Huang, M. Chen, P. Tan, and M. Hu, “A Hybrid Excitation Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Generator for Direct Drive Wave Energy Conversion,” in Digests of the Intermag Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021.
• B. Mallampati and H. Seetha, “A Review on Recent Approaches of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Intrusion Detection Systems,” Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 29–54, Mar. 2023.
• Shafqat, K. T. Lee, and D. H. Kim, “A Comprehensive Predictive Learning Framework for Optimal Scheduling and Control of Smart Home Appliances Based on User and Appliance Classification,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 2023.
• Thamaraikannan and V. Thirunavukkarasu, “Design optimization of mechanical components using an enhanced teaching-learning based optimization algorithm with differential operator,” Math Probl Eng, vol. 2014, 2014.
• A. Mirnikjoo, K. Abbaszadeh, and S. E. Abdollahi, “Multiobjective Design Optimization of a Double-Sided Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Generator for Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 6640–6649, Aug. 2021.
• Yee Heng, T. Jian Ding, C. Choe Wei Chang, T. Jian Ping, H. Choon Yian, and M. Dahari, “Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator design optimization for wind energy conversion system: A review,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 277–282, Dec. 2022.
• Zhang, S. Wang, and G. Ji, “A Comprehensive Survey on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015. Hindawi Limited, 2015.
• Linardatos, V. Papastefanopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis, “Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 1. MDPI AG, pp. 1–45, Jan. 01, 2021.
• A. Khanabadi, I. Dehghani, and S. Shojaeian, “Optimal Power Generation from Bagasse in a Sugarcane Plant using PSO Algorithm Compared to SQP Algorithm,” Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, 2020.
• Sulaiman, “Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Motor,” Ph.D dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Malaysia, 2012.
• Ouledali, A. Meroufel, P. Wira, and S. Bentouba, “Torque and Stator Flux Ripples Minimization for Direct Torque Control of PMSM by using Space Vector Modulation,” Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, 2018.