تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 10,003 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,617 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,292,283 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 55,347,042 |
Comparison of Cooperatives’ Members and Experts’ Views on Public Participation in Forestry and Rangeland By-Products (Case Study: Cooperative Companies, Lorestan Province, Iran) | ||
Journal of Rangeland Science | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 3، شماره 4، دی 2013، صفحه 286-294 اصل مقاله (3.24 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research and Full Length Article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Ali Ariapour* 1؛ Farzad Veisanloo2؛ Ali Hossein Biranvand3؛ Golnaz Kheradmand4 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Rangeland Management, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch, | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Rangeland Management, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch. | ||
3M.Sc. Student of Range Management (Corresponding Author) | ||
4M.Sc. Student of Range Management, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch, Boroujerd. | ||
چکیده | ||
This research was conducted to investigate the factors contributing to the failure in the forestry and rangeland by-product cooperative companies in Lorestan province, Iran. A descriptive-correlative research design was used. The statistical populations were 1100 people divided into two groups of experts from natural resource agency in Lorestan province and members of cooperative companies. The sample size was 183 persons. Sampling method was simple random type using Neyman–Pearson model. Data were analyzed based on descriptive statistics (T-Test) and Pearson correlation method. Single-sample t-test results showed that the views of the two groups on the effects of technical and economic barriers causing failure in cooperatives companies were the same, but the expert's views were different for managerial, educational, cultural, social, and legal indicators. Also the results of independent t-test between the two groups showed that the views of both experts and members for economic, managerial, educational, and legal barriers were the same, but their opinions for cultural, social and technical barriers were different. The results of cooperatives’ member’s views ranked indicators as managerial, legal, educational, cultural, social, economic, and technical barriers. For the views of experts they were ranked as cultural, social, managerial, economic, legal, technical, and educational barriers. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Cooperation؛ By-products؛ Cooperatives company؛ investment | ||
مراجع | ||
Abbasi, M., 2008. Factors affecting success and unsuccessful of Ardabil province production cooperatives. Review of the National Conference on Cooperation and Entrepreneurship, October 24-25. (In Persian). Askari, H., 1998. Cooperative role in economic development - social Iran. Cooperation twentieth year, numbers 204 and 205. (In Persian). Bostani, R., Aligholi, H., and Siddiqui, H., 2009. Factors Affecting Cooperative Extension and Expansion Sistine Baluchistan. Jour. Economic, Social and Cultural cooperation, the twentieth year, No. 210 and 211. (In Persian). Bruynis, C., Hahn, D. E., and Taylor, W. J., 1997. Critical success factors for emerging agricultural marketing cooperatives. American cooperation, pp 50- 54. Hazraty, M., Majidi, B., and Rahmati, B., 2010. Evaluation of factors affecting the success of agricultural cooperatives in rural economic development, Khodabandeh city center. Jour. Economic, Social and Cultural Cooperation in the twenty-first century, new course, No. 3. (In Persian). Khfayy, B., 2009. Factors affecting the success of agricultural cooperatives in the cities of Blusher and Dshstan. Jour. Economic, Social and Cultural Cooperation in the twenty-first century, new course, No. 3. (In Persian). Moradi, H. and Ali beigi, A. H., 2010. Factors affecting the success of fishery cooperatives in Kermanshah Province in the twenty-first century, new course, No. 3. (In Persian). Naraghi, A., 2011. Extensional structural setting appropriate structure for the members of agricultural cooperatives and agricultural cooperatives managers. Agricultural Research, Extension and Education, Vol. 4, No. 3. (In Persian). OPP, 2000. Office of Promotion and Public Participation, Iran. Sadie, H., and Azami, M., 2007. Pathology of agricultural production cooperatives: A case study of Hamadan Province, Kbudarhng. Scientific Jour. Fight Promotion, June and July, and pp. 83-128. (In Persian). Rostami Tabor, F., 2007. Satisfaction the success technical and social of peasant product cooperatives in province Kermanshah. Cooperation twentieth year, numbers 204 and 205. (In Persian). Wald, V., 1993. Cooperative natural resource management in India, related behavior change Evalaution 7. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 10,923 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 9,731 |