A Contrastive Study of Persian and English Written Discourse: Ellipsis in Realistic Novels

Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice

مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 2، مرداد 2008، صفحه 50-61   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

نویسندگان

Esmail Faghih¹؛ Sepideh Rahimpour²

¹Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

²Islamic Azad university Qouchan Branch

چکیده

 
This study aspires to examine the concept of ellipsis by comparing and contrasting English and Persian written texts. For this purpose, three Persian novels and three English ones were selected. These novels were analyzed carefully; they were compared and contrasted for types and amount of ellipsis used, through a Chi-square analysis.  The results of the data analysis revealed that various types of ellipsis were used differently in these two languages. In other words, in the English corpus, nominal ellipsis was used more frequently than verbal ellipsis but in the Persian one, the use of verbal ellipsis was more frequent than nominal. Moreover, the results of this study lend some support to the idea of the universality of ellipsis, in that, all subtypes of ellipsis were used in these two languages although they  were used more frequently in English than in Persian. This study might have implications for teachers, material developers, and researchers in the field of teaching English as a foreign language. In other words, teaching ellipsis directly to foreign language learners will improve the quality of their writing. Moreover,  the results of the present study have obvious importance in increasing students' awareness of the way native speakers of English organize their writing.
 
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

Contrastive Analysis؛ Ellipsis؛ Substitution؛ Nominal/ Verbal/ Clausal Ellipsis

مراجع

Al-e-Ahmad, J. (1337). Modir-e-Madrese. Tehran: Ravagh.

Bloor, M. & Bloor T. (2007). The Practice of critical discourse analysis. London: Oxford University Press.

Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York:Harcout, Brace, Jovauovich.

Daneshvar, S. (1348). Sou va shoun. Tehran: Kharazmi.

Dolatabadi, M. (1357). Kalidar. Tehran: Farhang-e-moaser.

Dickens, C. (1906). A tale of two cities. Boston: the Athenæum Press.

Fallahi, M. (1991). The grammatical structure of English and Persian. Tehran: Iran University Press.

Flaubert, G. (1981). Madame Bovary. New York: Oxford University Press.

Frinks, A. , Forey, G. & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students. ELT Journal, 61(4), 341-352.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hardt, D. & Romero, M. (2004). Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. Journal of Semantics, 21(4), 375-379.

Hendriks, P. (2004). Coherence relations, ellipsis, and contrastive topics. Journal of Semantics, 21(2), 133-140.

James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. London: Longman.

Leroux, G. (1995). The Phantom of the Opera. London: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Malmkjær, K. (2004). The linguistic encyclopedia. London: Routledge.

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar. New York: Arnold Press.