The Effect of BARJAM on the Revision of the Military policies of the members of the Persian Gulf Cooperative Council

International Journal of Political Science

مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 12، اسفند 2016، صفحه 43-53   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Saeid Jamshidi^* ؛ Reza AliAkbarpour

چکیده

The geopolitics, geostrategic and geo-economics position of the Persian Gulf causes this region to be the subject of attention of the ultra-regional powers. This subject became more important by the invention of fire weapons after Renaissance and the promotion of the colonic view in Europe. Spanish and British men besides the Portuguese that is America, Russia, china and European union all have tried to pursue their benefits in this region so that its due to their benefits and situation so, by direct military the subject of attention of the ultra-region powers.  This subject turns Persian Gulf to an unstable region ready for increasing the crisis. One of these crises is Iranian nuclear crisis and the position of international sanctions against Iran. These sanctions are most advantageous for the regional rivals and most disadvantageous for the benefits of Iranian Islamic Republic. By concluding the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the west, those countries which were supported the superpowers opposition with Iran by the illusion of creating a tradeoff which drive there into the margin, employed some polices by the former conditions, one of them is to buy military weapons by the aforementioned conditions to create a balance in power with Islamic Republic of Iran. In this paper, we investigate the relations of Iran with the countries in this region and ultra-regional countries and the approval of BARJAM (The acronym of the comprehensive program of cooperative act between Iran and the countries named 5+1 to review the military policies in the Persian Gulf region.     

کلیدواژه‌ها

Security؛ BARJAM؛ Military policies؛ The Cooperative council of Persian Gulf؛ Regional crisis

مراجع

Barzegar, Keyhan, (2014), the nuclear agreement in Geneva and the regional role of Iran, fa .cmessir/view tabid/127/Articled/2374/.aspx, February.15.2014

Bercher, Michael &Wikenfeld, Jonathan, (2003) the crisis of opposition and instability, Ali Sahebdel, the research institute of strategic studies. Tehran

Bilits, John & Smith, Steave, (2014), the globalization of the policy: the international relations in the modern era, AbolghasemRahchamani, AbrarMoaser, Tehran            

Bina,(2001), Security in the theories of international relations. APRIL.18.2001

Bna, (2016), the reasons of discrepancies between Iran and the cooperative council of the Persian Gulf .May .7.2016

Deorti, James &Faultzgraph, Robert, (2005), the contradictory hypotheses in the international relations, VahidBozorgi and AlirezaTayeb, Ghomes publication, Tehran

Elahi, Homayoun, (2005) the Persian Gulf and its issues, Ghomes publication, Tehran

GharayaghZandiDavood, (2008), Iran and the nuclear issue, the research institute of strategic studies, Tehran

Jamshidi, Saeid, (2013), Kashmir Radicalism violence, Hormoz publications. Tehran

Mafi, Katayoun, (2016), the nuclear negotiations from the beginning until the end

Moshirzadeh, Homeyra, (2004), Revolution in the international relations, the publication organization of the Islamic cultural and guidance ministry, Tehran

53

Noor bakhsh, Hussein.(1983), the Persian Gulf and its islands. Sanaei publications –Tehran

Roseanna, James, (2008), the security in the troubled World, AlirezaTayeb, Ney publication, Tehran

www.khabar online.ir

/detail.500280/world/diplomacy

www.parsine.com/fa/pages/?cid=36382.