تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 10,005 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,618 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,303,381 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 55,358,379 |
The Effects of English as Foreign Language Proficiency on Lexical Retention of Iranian Learners | ||
Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 1، آذر 2016، صفحه 55-68 اصل مقاله (2.31 M) | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Zinat Sha'bani1؛ Mohammad Taghi Hasani2 | ||
1Ph.D, Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, College of Humanities, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran | ||
2MA, Department of English Language and Literature, College of Humanities, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This study aimed at investigating the effects of English as foreign language proficiency on lexical attrition of Iranian learners in Nouroz holidays. For this purpose, 90 students studied English translation at Qazvin Azad University were selected. They were sophomore and were accessible for the present study. After administering a proficiency test (OPT), 60 students were selected according to the result of their OPT test for this study in which 25 students were male and 35 were female. In Time 1 administration and just before Nouroz vacation, OPT(Oxford Placement Test) was given to 90 participants to determine their level of proficiency and classify them into three high, middle, and low groups of proficiency level according to their scores on the test. Then, the devised test of receptive/productive vocabulary, modeled on The Vocabulary Levels Test, was administered to the same participants to measure their acquisition of nouns covered in their Reading Comprehension book. The receptive/productive vocabulary test is administered independently of the participants' final exam and before it. The results indicated that both types of tests were exposed to attrition. The results indicate that both types of tests were exposed to attrition. Therefore, the hypothesis that both receptive and productive word knowledge of learned vocabularies are more prone to attrition rather than retention after English disuse by Iranian learners over Nouroz vacation is confirmed. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
lexical retention؛ Proficiency؛ Nouroz holidays | ||
مراجع | ||
Altenberg, E. (1991). Assessing first language vulnerability to attrition, in H. Seliger & R. Vago, eds, ‘First Language Attrition’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189–206. Chomsky, N.(1995). Conditions on transformation, in M. Anderson & P. Kiparsky, eds, ‘A Festschrift for Morris Halle’, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, pp. 81–160. JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 5, NO. 1, Summer 2016 67 Clyne, M.(1994). Thirty Years later: Some observations on “Refugee German” in Melbourne, in H. Scholler & H. Reilly, eds, ‘Lexicography and Dialect Geogra- hy: Festgabe for Hans Kurath’, Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 96–106. de Bot, K. & Clyne, M. (1994). ‘A 16 year longitudinal study of language attri- tion in Dutch immigrants in Australia’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 15(1), 17–28. Ellis, R. (1994), The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gurel, A. (2004). Linguistic Characteristics of Second Language Acquisition and First Language Attrition: Turkish Overt Versus Null Pronouns, PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal. Hansen, L., ed. (1980). Second Language Attrition in Japanese Contexts, Oxford: Ox- ford University Press. Hutz, M. (2004). Is there a natural process of decay? in M. S. Schmid, B. Kopke, M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar, eds, ‘First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Per-spectives on Methodological Issues’, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 189– 206. Jakobson, R. (1941), Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals, The Hague: Mouton. Kopke,¨ B. (2004). ‘Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition’, Journal of Neurolinguistics 17, 3–30. Kopke,¨ B. & Schmid, M. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase, in M. S. Schmid, B. Kopke,¨ M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar, eds, ‘First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues’, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–43. Schmid, M. (2011). Language Attrition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schmid, M. (2005). The Language Attrition Test Battery: A Research Manual. ms, University of Groningen. JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 5, NO. 1, Summer 2016 68 Schmid, M. (2002). First Language Attrition, Use, and Maintenance: The Case of Ger-man Jews in Anglophone Countries, Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. Seliger, H. (1996). Primary language attrition in the context of bilingualism, in W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia, eds, ‘Handbook of Second Language Acquisition’, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 605–626. Tsimpli, I. M., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F. (2004), ‘First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English’, International Journal of Bilingualism 8(3), 257–277. Waas, M. (1996), Language Attrition Downunder: German Speakers in Australia, Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Weltens, B. & Cohen, A. (1989), ‘Language Attrition Research: An Introduction’,Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(02), 127–133. Wilson, F. (2009), Processing at the Syntax-discourse Interface in Second Lan-guage Acquisition, PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh. Yagmur,ˇ K. (2004), Issues in finding the appropriate methodology, in M. S. Schmid, B. Kopke,¨ M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar, eds, ‘First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues’, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 129 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 126 |