مفهوم پردازی گفتمان برنامه درسی محیط کار؛ گفتمان نو ظهور یا مغفول

پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی

مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 52، خرداد 1396، صفحه 28-34   

نویسندگان

هومن دوستی حاجی آبادی¹؛ کورش فتحی واجارگاه^{* 2}؛ اباصلت خراسانی³

¹دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

²استاد گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

³دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف مفهوم پردازی برنامه درسی محیط کار به عنوان یک گفتمان مغفول یا نوظهور به صورت کیفی و با دیدی پدیدارشناسانه از نوع توصیفی انجام گرفت. برنامه درسی محیط کار  پدیده­ای است که وابسته به زمینه، متن و تابع بلوغ سازمان­ها بوده و شامل مجموعه‌ای از مباحثات است که در بسترهای مختلف می‌بایست مورد تفسیر و تعبیر قرار گیرد. زیرا در فرآیند تولید گفتمانی برخی برخی گفتمان‌ها، ممنوع یا سرکوب و برخی دیگر پذیرفته می‌شوند. از سویی تفاوت در بستر، عرصه و گفتمان های معین، موجب شکل گیری، دگرگونی و حتی دیگرگونی در گفتمان های برنامه درسی در محیط کار می شود. آنچه در این فرآیند مشهود است وجود برنامه درسی محیط کار به عنوان یک فرآیند مغفول است که فراسوی هر گفتمان آن، گفتمان دیگری وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

برنامه درسی محیط کار؛ یادگیری محیط کار؛ گفتمان

مراجع

• Vanderstoep, w.Scott, (2009). Research metod for every day life. Blending qualitative and quantitative approach, by john wiley & sons, Inc • Van manen, m. (1990). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, London, Ontario, Canada: the university of western Ontario • Billett, S (1996) ‘Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum’, Studies in • Continuing Education, vol 18(1), pp 43–58. • Archer, W., & Davidson, J. (2008). Graduate employability: What do employers think and want? London: Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE). • Bell, J. & Dale, M. (1999). Informal learning in the workplace, Research Report No. 134, Department for Education and Employment, London, England • Billet, S. (2001) Learning in the Workplace-Strategies for effective practice, Crow’s Nest: Allen & Unwin. • Bryman .Alan (2008). Social Science Research Methods, Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, especially 272 • Cheetham, G. and Chivers, G. (2001). How professionals learn in practice: an investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions, journal of European Industrial Training, 25(5), pp. 264-292. • Clus, M. A. (2011). Informal learning in the workplace: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 51(2), 355-373 • Coffield, F. (1999). Breaking the consensus: Lifelong learning as social control, British Journal of Educational Research, 25(4): 479–499. • Colley, H., Hodkinson, P. and Malcolm, J. (2003). Non-Formal learning: Mapping the conceptual terrain, A Consultation Report. Leeds: University of Leeds Lifelong learning Institute. • Collin, K. and Tynjala, P. (2003) Integration theory and practice? Employees and students experience of learning at work, Journal of Workplace learning, 15(7/8),pp338-344 • Creswell , J. W. & Plano Clark, V .L. (2007). Designing and Conducting mixed methods research. Thousand, CA: Sage. • Drohan, Siobhan (2014). A theoretical framework of workplace learning for entry-level software engineering graduates. Ph.D Dissertation, Waterford institute of technology. • Evans, K. and Kersh, N. (2004). Recognition of tacit skills and knowledge sustaining learning outcomes in workplace environments, journal of workplace learning, 16(1/2), pp. 63-74. • Fleming, J., & Ferkins, L. (2006). Enhancing student employability: A New Zealand case study of cooperative education in sport. In N. Becket & P. Kemp (Eds.), Enhancing graduate employability in business and management, leisure, sport and tourism (pp. 98-105). Newbury, UK: Threshold Press. • Garrick, J. (1998). Informal learning in the workplace: Unmasking human resource development, London: Routledge. • Guba, E. G. (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication and technology Journal, 29 (2), p.76. • Harris, R., Willis, P., Simons, M. and Collins, E. (2001). The relative contribution of institutional and workplace learning environments: an analysis of apprenticeship training, journal of Vocational Education and training, 53(2), pp. 263-278. • Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Method Research: A Time Has Come, Journal of Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 14-26. • Lee, T., Fuller, A., Ahston, D., Butler, P., Flested, A., Unwin, L. and Walters, S. (2004). Learning as work: teaching and learning processes in the contemporary work organization, Learning as work research paper No 2, University of Leicester: center for labour Market Studies. • Littlejohn, A. (1998). Language teaching for the millennium. English Teaching Professional, 8, 3-5 • Marsick, V.J. & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace, London: Routledge. • Marsick, V.J. & Watkins, K. (1999). Envisioning new organisations for learning, in D. Boud. & J. Garrick (eds.), Understanding learning at work, London: Routledge: 199–216. • Martin, A.J., & Hughes, H. (2009). How to make the most of work integrated learning. Palmerton North, New Zealand: Massey University. • Nabi, G. and Bagley, d. (1998). Graduates perception of transferable personal skills and future career progression in the UK, Career Development International, 3(1), pp. 31-39. • Noble, C. and Hassell,K. (2008). Informal learning in workplace:what are the environmental barriers for junior hospital pharmacists, International journal of pharmacy practice, 16, pp. 257-263.