A Critical View on New Urbanism Theory in Urban Planning: From Theory to Practice

Space Ontology International Journal

مقاله 6، دوره 6، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 22، آذر 2017، صفحه 89-97   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Mitra Ghorbi¹؛ Hamid Mohammadi^{* 2}

¹M.U.P., Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

²Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

چکیده

In the wake of Jacobs’s criticisms of planning, planners increasingly felt a level of angst over, or even responsibility for, the condition of the city. Schooled in preparing and implementing plans and land use regulations, they appreciated the appeal of a new movement that offered a simple, tangible, and marketable recipe for practice. New urbanism theory is one of the contemporary urban theories that developed as a movement within practice as a response to the failure of cities and suburbs in the mid-twentieth century. Now these questions take shape in a mind: May New Urbanism lead to Planning good community? How is new urbanism developing theory, and how does it contribute to our understanding of theory? How is planning theory responding to new urbanism and the insights its practice generates? These are questions that the paper tried to answer them. Using content analysis, various ideas and views about New Urbanism and its formation from theory to practice have been reviewed and criticized. We concluded that although the new urbanists want to turn the situation around and they envision cities without suburbs, but in practice, they could not make good community According to the principles that this normative theory committed. In present day most new urbanist projects have proven relatively homogeneous in composition. Rather than minimizing difference, new urbanist projects have sometimes exacerbated societal differences by creating enclaves of affluence in the urban environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها

New Urbanism؛ Theory؛ Good community؛ Civilization؛ Critism

مراجع

1. Boyer, M. C. (1983) Dreaming the Rational City: The myth of American city planning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bohl, C. (2002) Place Making: Developing town centers, main streets, and urban villages, Washington: Urban Land Institute.
3. Bohl, C. (2000) ‘New urbanism and the city: potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods’, Housing Policy Debate 11(4): 761–801.
4. Bookout, L. (1992b) ‘Neotraditional town planning: Cars, pedestrians and transit’, Urban Land 51(2): 10–15.
5. Calthorpe, P. (1994) ‘The region’, in P. Katz (ed.), The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. xi–xvi.
6. Chiras, D. and D. Wann (2003) Superbia! 31 ways to create sustainable neighborhoods, Gabriola Island BC: New Society Publishers.
7. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An analysis of pollution and taboo, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8. Douglas, M. and B. Isherwood (1996) The World of Goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption, London: Routledge.
9. Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk and R. Alminara (2003) The New Civic Art, New York: Rizzoli.
10. Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk and J. Speck (2000) Suburban Nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream, New York: North Point Press.
11. Elshater, Abeer. (2012), New Urbanism Principles versus Urban Design Dimensions towards Behavior Performance Efficiency in Egyptian Neighbourhood Unit, Social and Behavioral Sciences , 826 – 843
12. Fainstein, S. (2000) ‘New directions in planning theory’, Urban Affairs Review 35(4): 451–78.
13. Friedman, A. (1979) The Good Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From knowledge to action, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Frey, H. (1999) Designing the City, London: E & FN Spon.
16. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison, trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books Random House.
17. Foster, Sarah, Hooper, Paula, Knuiman, Matthew, Bull, Fiona and Billie Giles-Corti, (2017), ‘Are LiveableNeighbourhoods Safer Neighbourhoods? Testing the Rhetoric on NewUrbanismand Safety from Crime in Perth, Western Australia’, Social Science & Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.013
18. Grant, J., (2015) ‘New Urbanism’, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), pp: 809–814.Available online 12 March 2015
19. Grant, J., (2009) ‘Theory and Practice in Planning the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles’, Journal of Planning Theory &Practicevolume 10, pp: 11–33.
20. Grant, J., P. Marcotullio and A. Sorensen (2004) ‘Towards land management policies for more sustainable cities’, in A. Sorensen, P. Marcotullio and J. Grant (eds), Towards Sustainable Cities: East Asian, North American and European Perspectives on Managing Urban Regions, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 301–8.
21. Grant, J., H. Saito and K. Itoh (2002) ‘The effects of administrative structure on planning outcomes: comparing Canada and Japan’, Faculty of Sociology Bulletin (Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan) 16(1): 87–107.
22. Harvey, D. (1997) ‘The new urbanism and the communitarian trap’, Harvard Design Magazine 1: 1–3, Online. Available at http:mitpress.mit.edu/HDM (Accessed 10 September 2003).
23. Heins, Matthew, (2015), Finding Common Ground Between New Urbanism and Landscape Urbanism, Journal of Urban Design, 0:3, 293-302, DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1031002
24. Hebbert, M. (1986) ‘Urban sprawl and urban planning in Japan’, Town Planning Review 57(2): 141–58.
25. Hammond, M. (1972) The City in the Ancient World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Kelbaugh, D. (1997) Common Places: Toward neighborhood and regional design, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
27. Jacobs, J. (1961) Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Vintage Books.
28. Kunstler, J. H. (1999) ‘Where evil dwells: reflections on the Columbine School massacre’, Address given at the Congress for the New Urbanism, Milwaukee, 6 June 1999, Online. Available at www.kunstler.com/spch_milw.html (Accessed 27 May 2004).
29. Krier, L. (2001) ‘Interview with Nikos Salingaros’. Planetizen, 5 November. Online. Available at www.planetizen.com/oped/item.php?id=35 (Accessed 8 January 2004).
30. Krier, L. (1984a) ‘Drawings’ (Originally in Archives d’ArchitectureModerne, Brussels, xxv–xxxi, (1980), Revised version in Architectural Design 54 (Nov/Dec), pp. 16–22.
31. Krier, L.  (1984b) Houses, Palaces, Cities, D. Porphyrios (ed.), London: Architectural  DesignEditions
32. Krieger, A. (ed.) (1991) Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and town-making principles, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, New York: Rizzoli.
33. Lynch, K. (1981) A Theory of Good City Form, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Liu, Jianxiao, (2012),The New Urbanism as a Theory and Its Contemporary Application in China, Construction and industry press
35. Marcuse, P. (2000) ‘The new urbanism: the dangers so far’, DISP 140: 4–6. Online. Available at  http://disp.ethz.ch/pdf/140_1.pdf (Accessed 5 December 2003).
36. Robertson, J. (1984) ‘The empire strikes back,’ In D. Porphyrios (ed.), Leon Krier, Houses, Palaces, Cities, London: Architectural Design Editions, pp. 11–3, 18–9.
37. Rabinow, P. (1984) The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books.
38. Rae, D. (2003) City: Urbanism and its end, New Haven: Yale University Press.
39. Ross, A. (1999) The Celebration Chronicles: Life, liberty, and the pursuit of property value in Disney’s new town, New York: Ballantine Books.
40. Rees, A. (2003) ‘New urbanism: visionary landscapes in the twenty-first century’, in M. Lindstrom and H. Bartling (eds), Suburban Sprawl: Culture, theory, and politics, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 93–114.
41. Shipley, R. and R. Newkirk (1998) ‘Visioning: Did anyone see where it came from?’ Journal of Planning Literature 12(4): 407–16.
42. Talen, E. and C. Ellis. (2002) ‘Beyond relativism: reclaiming the search for good city form’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 36–49.
43. Talen, E. (2001) ‘Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence: an analysis of the variability of suburban preference’, Journal of the American Planning Association 67(2): 199–216.
44. Ward, S. (ed.) (1992) The Garden City: Past, present, and future, London: E & FN Spon.
45. Zimmerman, J. (2001) ‘The “nature” of urbanism on the new urbanist frontier: sustainable development, or defense of the suburban dream?’,Urban Geography 22(3):249–67.