بررسی ارتباط بین میزان هویت پذیری معلمان زبان انگلیسی (فارسی‌زبان) با خودکارایی آنها و موفقیت زبان‌آموزان

فصلنامه زبان و ادب فارسی

مقاله 11، دوره 8، شماره 26.27، شهریور 1395، صفحه 241-260   

نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

عادل دست گشاده^*

عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج

چکیده

این مطالعه به بررسی ارتباط بین میزان هویت‌پذیری معلمان زبان انگلیسی (فارسی زبان) با خودکارایی آنها و موفقیت زبان آموزان پرداخت. هشتاد و هفت معلم از مؤسسات مختلف زبان در این مطالعه شرکت داشتند و به پرسشنامه‌هایی میزان هویت پذیری معلمان و خودکارایی پاسخ دادند. همچنین از شرکت کنندگان خواسته شد تا میانگین نمرات کسب شدۀ زبان‌آموزان خود در ترم قبل را ثبت نمایند. نتایج تحلیل داده‌ها وجود ارتباط موثرمعنی‌داری بین میزان هویت‌پذیری معلمان با میزان خودکارایی آنها و موفقیت زبان آموزان را نشان داد. تجزیه و تحلیل رگرسیون به منظور بررسی اینکه آیا مولفه‌های هویت پذیری میتواند میزان خودکارایی معلم و موفقیت زبان‌آموزان را پیش‌بینی کند، به کار گرفته‌شد. چهار زیر مجموعۀ هویت‌پذیری یعنی خودهای ایده‌آل، خودهای باید، خودهای واقعی و خودهای ترس به‌عنوان پیش‌بینی کننده‌های میزان خودکارایی معلم درنظر گرفته‌شد ورابطۀ مثبت معنی‌داری بین این زیر‌مجموعه‌ها و خود‌کارایی معلمان وجود داشت. اما تنها سه گروه از این زیر‌مجموعه‌ها شامل خودهای ایده آل، خودهای بایدو خودهای واقعی با میزان موفقیت زبان‌آموزان همبستگی مثبت معنی‌داری داشت. نتایج به دست آمده نشان داد که خودکارایی و نگرانی در خصوص پیشرفت زبان‌آموزان از عناصر کلیدی فرایند هویت‌پذیری معلمان زبان انگلیسی (فارسی زبان) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

هویت پذیری؛ خودکارایی؛ معلمان زبان انگلیسی فارسی زبان

مراجع

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A., & Locke, E. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.

Baumeister, R. F. & Wilson, B. (1996). Life stories and the four needs for meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 322-325.

Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford.

Bernat, E (2008): Beyond beliefs: Psycho-cognitive, sociocultural and emergent ecological approaches to learner perceptions in foreign language acquisition. The Asian EFL Journal 10 (3), 7–27.

Berzonsky, M. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 268-282.

Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education. 16, 239-253.

           Burke, P. J. & Stets, J.E. (1999). Trust and Commitment through self-verification. Social 

                    Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347-66.

Caprara, G. V. et al. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95(4), 821-832.

Caprara, G. V. et al. (2003). Teachers', school staff's and parents' efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitude toward school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 15−31.

Caprara, G. V. et al. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology. 44, 473-490.

 Cervone D, et al. (2004). Self-efficacy beliefs and the architecture of personality: on knowledge, appraisal, and self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs, (Eds.) Handbook of Self-regulation Research. New York: Guilford.

Deemer, S. A. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research. 46(1),73-90.

Dörnyei, Z.  (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Dörnyei, Z.  (2010). Researching motivation: From integrativeness to the ideal L2 self. InS. Hunston & D. Oakey (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills. (pp. 74-83).  London: Routledge.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner. Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dunkel, C. (2000). Possible selves as a mechanism for identity exploration. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 519-529.

Evans, E. D., & Tribble, M. (1986). Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy, and commitment to teaching among preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Research. 80 (2), 81-85.

Erikson, M.G. (2007).  The meaning of the future: Toward a more specific definition of possible selves. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 348-358.

Franks, D. D. & Joseph, M. (1976). Efficacious action and social approval as interacting dimensions of self-Esteem: A tentative formulation through construct validation. Sociometry 39, 324-341.

Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education. 18, 675-686.

Gecas, V. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem.  Social Psychology Quarterly 46, 77-88.

Gencer, A. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education. 23, 664-675.

Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76, 569-582.

Goddard, R. D., Logerfo, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2004).High school accountability: The role of perceived collective efficacy. Educational Policy, 8(3), 403-425.

Grotevant, H. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203–222.

Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, 319-340.

 Kubanyiova,P. (2009). Possible selves of language teachers and teacher development. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Kumaravadivedu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly. 35(4), 537-560.

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.

Midgley, C., et al., (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247−258.

Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 23(4), 589 – 618.

Ross, J. A.  & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy; Results of randomized field trial. The Journal of Educational Research. 101(1), 50-66.

Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education. 17(1), 51-65.

Rots, I., et al. (2007). Teacher education, graduates’ teaching commitment and entrance into the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 543-556.

Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949-965.

Shaalvik, E. M., & Shaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology. 99(3), 611-625.

Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review. 16(2), 153-176.

Tournaki, N., & Podell, D. M. (2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21, 299-314.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). The influence of resources and support on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

Tsui, A. B. M. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly. 41(4), 657 – 680.

Wallick, J. S. (2002). The relationship between teacher efficacy and student academic outcomes on curriculum-based measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific, Stockton.(Proquest)

Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. Journal of Educational Research. 100(5), 303-310.

Watzke, J. L. (2007). Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a developmental theory of beginning teacher practices. The Modern Language Journal. 91(1), 63 – 82.

Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teacher. The Journal of Educational Research. 96(1), 54-63.

Wheatley, Karl F. (2005).  The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy.  Teaching and

Teacher Education, 21, 757-766.

Woolfilk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(1), 81-91.

Yost, R. (2002). “I think I can”: Mentoring as a means of enhancing teacher efficacy. The Clearing House. 75(4), 195-197.