Feeding of the Bee Families with an Addition of CoSO4

Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science

مقاله 20، دوره 8، شماره 2، شهریور 2018، صفحه 343-346   

نویسندگان

R. Balkanska^{* 1}؛ D. Salkova²

¹Institute of Animal Science, Spirka pochivka 1, 2232 Kostinbrod, Bulgaria

²Deparment of Experimental Parasitology, Institute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Antropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria

چکیده

For their normal living, honey bees (Apis mellifera) require proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins and minerals. It is well known that Co and vitamin B₁₂ are two nutrients that have been reported in pollen and plants that have had positive results in bees feeding. In this respect, the aim of the study is to determine the influence of feeding of the bee families with CoSO₄ as a supplement on the chemical composition of non-flying worker bees' bodies and some bee products components. The study was conducted during May-August 2015 in the experimental apiary of the Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod. A total of 6 bee families were observed-3 experimental (fed with sugar syrup, sugar: water 1:1 and 4 mg/L CoSO₄ as a supplement) and 3 control (fed only with sugar syrup). The results show that the addition of 4 mg/L CoSO₄ in the sugar syrup of the bee families do not have influence on the average weight and chemical composition of non-flying worker bees. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in the diastase activity of the honey in the experimental group bee families were found.

کلیدواژه‌ها

bee haemolymph؛ bee products؛ CoSO4؛ lysozyme؛ total protein

اصل مقاله

INTRODUCTION

For their normal living, honey bees (Apis mellifera) require proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, vitamins and minerals. They receive all of these components from the nectar and the bee pollen. At the same time, in order to increase the average productivity, activation of the bee queen laying activity, more brood breeding and development of the hypopharyngeal glands, it is increasingly necessary various supplements in the beekeeping to be used. According to their chemical nature these supplements are proteins and amino acids (Nenchev and Zhelyazkova, 2010), carbohydrates and their substitutes (Ivanova, 2005), vitamins (Zhelyazkova and Nenchev, 1995; Zhelyazkova and Nenchev, 2001), trace elements (Simkus et al. 2007), various stimulating products (Shumkova, 2016), plant extracts (Hristakov, 2012) and a combination of vitamins and minerals (Stoilov et al. 2000; Sahinler et al. 2005). However, the effect of different application of trace elements such as Co, Mn, I and Se to the bees’ life processes are studied mainly for increasing the bee brood. Furthermore, the trace elements in the beekeeping practice are considered to be stimulators of the resistance and the development of the immune system. The importance of Co salts was underlined for the first time by a few authors from the field of bee nutrition (Glushkov and Yakovlev, 1965; Goloskov, 1977). It is well known that Co and vitamin B₁₂ are two nutrients that have been reported in pollen and plants that have had positive results in bees feeding. The presence of Co in the diet increased the number of bee larvae in bee families with 29.24% (Colibar et al. 2011). Some veterinary medical products (Startovit) which contain Co salts also increase the strength of the bee colonies and quantity of the bee brood (Zhelyazkova et al. 2008). In Bulgaria Zhelyazkova (1999) and Zhelyazkova (2005) found that the addition of Co (6 mg/L) and Mn (2 mg/L) salts in the bee food had a positive impact on the development and productivity of the bee families and vitamin C metabolism in the bee organism. The review of the available literature shows that there is no comprehensive and systematic study for the effect of CoSO₄ as a supplement on the chemical composition of the bee bodies and the bee products obtained. In this regard, the aim of the study is to determine the influence of feeding of the bee families with addition of CoSO₄ on the chemical composition of non-flying worker bees' bodies and some bee products components.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted during May-August 2015 in the experimental apiary of the Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod. Before the experiment the bee families were balanced in regards to strength. In the experiment for royal jelly production a total of 6 bee families were observed-3 experimental (fed with sugar syrup, sugar: water 1:1 and 4 mg/L CoSO₄ as a supplement) and 3 control (fed only with sugar syrup). The royal jelly is obtained by the artificial wax cups method (Grout, 1992). The sugar syrup is administered in a dose of 300 mL, 3 times per week in the bee feeders of the experimental and control group bee families. The following parameters were measured during the experiment: chemical composition of non-flying worker bee bodies – water content and mineral composition-weight analysis; proteins-Keldahl method, lipids-Soxhlet method (AOAC, 2002). The bee samples were collected at the end of the experimental period. The bees are anesthetized with diethyl ether and stored in a refrigerator at -20 ˚C. Average body weight of non-flying worker bees (g) - 100 honey bees were collected from each bee family from different honeycombs. The weight of each bee is measured on an analytical balance. Total protein in the bee haemolymph - spectrophotometric determination by the Audit Diagnostics Kit and the lysozyme content was determined by the method of Motavkina et al. (1979). The sample analysis was carried out at the National Diagnostic Science and Research Veterinary Medical Institute, Sofia. Average number of queen cells – the smallest number of queen cells in each bee family is determined. From all bee families royal jelly is collected from the same number of queen cells (the smallest number of queen cells). The average queen cells number is obtained as the arithmetic average of all processes for royal jelly production. Average amount of royal jelly in a queen cell - it represents the total amount of royal jelly divided by the queen cell numbers. The average quantity is obtained as the arithmetic average of all samples obtained. Physicochemical properties of multifloral honey – water content, electrical conductivity, diastase activity and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are determined according to the Harmonised methods of the European Honey Commission (Bogdanov et al. 1997). Content of Co – royal jelly and multifloral honey samples were digested with concentrated HNO₃. The Co content was analyzed with a flame atomic absorption spectrometer Perkin Elmer Analyst 400 with an air / acetylene flame. The optimal instrumental parameters are determined according to the manufacturer's instructions. The analytical signal of Co is periodically checked with a known concentration standard. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS, version 21 for windows (SPSS, 2012). The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Table 1 are presented the results for chemical composition of non-flying worker bees. The analysis of the data shows that the protein, lipid and mineral content are not significant between control and experimental groups after feeding of the bee families with CoSO₄ as a supplement. The amount of protein of the bee bodies increased on average by 3%. Similar results are obtained by Simkus et al. (2007) for the effect of organic selenium preparation Selenopiran on the development and productivity of bee families. The amount of protein of the bee bodies increased on average by 3%. No significant difference was found in the average weight of non-flying worker bees fed sugar syrup with CoSO₄. The mean weight and standard deviation in the control group was 0.108 ± 0.018 g and in the experimental group was 0.112 ± 0.010 g. Figure 1 shows the minimum and maximum values of the tested indicator for the two groups. The results show narrower ranges of variation in the mean weights of worker bees in the experimental group compared to the control. To establish the effect of CoSO₄ in the sugar syrup, the total protein and lysozyme in the haemolymph of non-flying worker bees were examined. The obtained haemolymph samples are assembly samples of a large number of bees. The results for the amount of total protein and lysozyme in bee haemolymph are presented on Figures 2 and 3. The results for the total protein and lysozyme content between the experimental and the control group are identical. In this experiment the addition of CoSO₄ do not influence the synthesis and accumulation of total protein and lysozyme content in the bee haemolymph.

 

Table 1 Chemical composition of the body of non-flying worker bees (Mean±SD)

SD: standard deviation.

 

Figure 1 Box plot diagram of the average weight of non-flying worker bees, g, (n=100)

Mean values ± standard deviations in the control group – 0.108 ± 0.018 g; experimental group – 0.112 ± 0.010 g, not significant differences

 

Figure 2 Total protein content in bee haemolymph, (n=150), not significant differences

 

 

Figure 3 Lysozyme content in bee haemolymph, (n=150), not significant differences

 

 

It is well known that the total protein and lysozyme values in the haemolymph can be used to detect the immunostimulatory effect of various biologically active substances (Gurgulova et al. 2001). Until now, in the available literature, there is no data on the content of these two haemolymph components in the bee families fed with CoSO₄. Table 2 shows the results for the average quantity of royal jelly in a queen cell.

 

Table 2 Number of queen cells and quantity of royal jelly (Mean±SD)

 

SD: standard deviation.

 

No significant differences in the average amount of royal jelly produced in the control and the experimental group were found. This means that the CoSO₄ as a supplement in the sugar syrup does not lead to a larger quantity of royal jelly compared to the control group. The next items are connected to some components of the composition of the bee products obtained. It is interesting to note that CoSO₄ added to the sugar syrup influences some physicochemical characteristics of bee honey. From all studied parameters in the honey samples - water content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, only diastase activity showed statistically higher values in the samples obtained from the experimental group (P<0.05), (Table 3).

 

Table 3 Physicochemical properties of multifloral bee honey (Mean±SD)

 

The means within the same row with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05).

SD: standard deviation.

 

Processing of nectar into honey and in royal jelly synthesis involve the same glands, which perform various functions during the different stages of the worker bees’ development. From the results obtained, it can be assumed that the bee families fed with CoSO₄ influence on the hypopharyngeal glands of worker bees. As a result they are better developed and the honey from the experimental bee families has a higher diastase activity than the control group. Simkus et al. (2007) found that diastase activity in the bee honey from the experimental group bee families (fed with Selenopiran as a supplement) is higher than in the control group but the results are not significant. The addition of CoSO₄ on the experimental group did not affect significantly the Co content of the studied bee products (Table 4).

 

Table 4 Content of Co in bee products (Mean±SD)

 

SD: standard deviation.

 

The differences in the Co content of royal jelly and honey from the experimental and control groups are not statistically significant. Zhelyazkova et al. (2010) also found lower values for Co content in honey samples. As a major reason for the non-accumulation of Co in royal jelly and honey can be explain with the bio-barrier function of the bee organism.

 

CONCLUSION

The addition of 4 mg/L CoSO₄ in sugar syrup do not effect on the average weight of non-flying worker bees and the chemical composition of their body. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in the diastase activity of the honey in the experimental group bee families were found. The addition of CoSO₄ on the experimental group did not affect significantly the Co content in royal jelly and multifloral bee honey.

مراجع

AOAC. (2002). Official Methods of Analysis. 17^th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Bogdanov S., Martin P. and Lullmann C. (1997). Harmonised methods of the European Honey commission. Apidologie. 3, 1-57.

Colibar O., Popovici D., Julean C., Balint A. and Korodi G. (2011). The effect of vitamin B₁₂, cobalt and one water-soluble mineral and vitamin concoction on the development of bee families. Med. Vet. 44, 205-210.

Glushkov N.M. and Yakovlev A.S. (1965). New data on how to use growth stimulators in apiculture. Pp. 114-117 in Proc. 20^th Int. Beek. Jubilee Congr. Bucharest, Romania.

Goloskov V.G. (1977). Influence of trace elements on development of the pharyngeal glands, fat body and ovary of the bees. Ulyanovsk. 5, 3-11.

Grout R.A. (1992). The Hive and the Honey Bee. Dadant and Sons Inc., USA.

Gurgulova K., Valchovski R., Zhelyazkova I. and Nenchev P. (2001). Effect of some stimulating substances on natural immunity on honey bees Apis melifera. J. Anim. Sci. 2, 113-115.

Hristakov I. (2012). Effect of the use of Tribulus terrestris extract on the development and productivity of the bee families. Ph D. Thesis. Trakia Univ., Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Ivanova T. (2005). Possibilities of application of carbohydrates and protein products for feeding the honey bee Apis mellifera Ph D. Thesis. Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria.

Motavkina N.S., Kovalev B.M. and Sharonov A.S. (1979). Micromethod for quantitative determination of lysozyme, Lab. Works. 12, 722-723.

Nenchev P. and Zhelyazkova I. (2010). Proteins. Trakia University Press, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Sahinler N., Gul A. and Sahin A. (2005). Vitamin E supplement in honey bee colonies to increase cell acceptance rate and royal jelly production. J. Apicul. Res. 44, 58-60.

Shumkova R. (2016). A comparative study of the impact of stimulant products on the biological development of the bee families. Ph D. Thesis. Institute of Animal Science, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria.

Simkus A., Juozaitiene V., Simkiene A., Juozaitis A., Nevitov M., Ostapchuk A., Gamayunov A., Amsiejus A., Zavodnik L.B. and Lubyte J. (2007). The effect of organic selenium on the development of bee families and their productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 55-59.

SPSS Inc. (2012). Statistical Package for Social Sciences Study. SPSS for Windows, Version 21. Chicago SPSS Inc.

Stoilov N., Spasov H. and Stamenova L. (2000). Use of stimulators of Queen products. Acta Entomol. Bulgarica. 3, 16-23.

Zhelyazkova I. (1999). Influence of pollen substitute products on some biological properties of honey bee (Apis mellifera).Ph D. Thesis. Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Zhelyazkova I. (2005). Feeding of Honey Bees. Enyvche, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Zhelyazkova I. and Nenchev P. (1995). Influence of АD₃Е-Hydro vitamin mixture on the body weight and mineral composition of worker bees (Apis Mellifera). J. Anim. Sci. 32, 34-36.

Zhelyazkova I. and Nenchev P. (2001). Effect of complex vitamin preparation АD₃Е-Hydro on the development of bee families. J. Anim. Sci. 38, 119-121.

Zhelyazkova I., Atanasova S., Barakova V. and Mihaylova G. (2010). Content of heavy metals and metalloids in bees and bee products from areas with different degree of anthropogenic impact. Agric. Sci. Technol. 3, 136-142.

Zhelyazkova I., Gurgulova K., Panchev I. and Popova V. (2008). Influence of the Startovit, Apitonus and Apisaniran on the productivity parameters of bee family. Pp. 101-106 in Proc. Apimon. Symp. Bucharest, Romania.