The Impact of Indirect Focused and Unfocused Corrective Feedback on Written Accuracy

International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research

مقاله 3، دوره 1، شماره 4، اسفند 2013، صفحه 35-44   

نوع مقاله: Research Papers

نویسندگان

Malihe Salami^{* 1}؛ Mohammad Raouf Moini²

¹MSc student, Kashan University

²Assistant professor, university of Kashan

چکیده

Usually writing teachers feel commitment to provide their learners with corrective feedback (CF) to their linguistic errors. The study investigated whether two types of written corrective feedback, indirect focused corrective feedback and indirect unfocused corrective feedback, produced differential effects on the accurate use of grammatical forms by high intermediate EFL learners. In this study, 54 female EFL learners formed two experimental groups and one control group. One experimental group received indirect focused written CF, and the other experimental group received indirect unfocused written CF for six weeks.  The control group, nevertheless, received no particular feedback within this period. Results of performing ANOVA with post-hoc tests revealed the accuracy development of both experimental groups.  However, unfocused group achieved the highest accuracy gain scores for simple past tense forms (copula past tense, regular past tense and irregular past tense) subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions. It was further found that unfocused feedback can contribute to grammatical accuracy but its long-term effectiveness is not quite as significant as its short-term effectiveness. The study also suggested that unfocused written CF reflects better teacher’s objective as it views writing correction as a whole rather than as a way of practicing grammar.

کلیدواژه‌ها

written corrective feedback؛ focused feedback؛ unfocused feedback؛ Grammatical Accuracy

مراجع

Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research 7(3)           , 347-376.

Bitchener, J., (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback    . Journal of Second Language Writing 17(2) , 102-118.

Bitchener, J. , &Knoch , U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students . Language Teaching Research Journal 12(3) , 409-431.

Bitchener, J., &Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback . Journal of Second Language Writing 19(4) , 207-217.

Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing 18(2) , 136-140.

Byrne, D. (1967). Progressive picture compositions: Pupils’ Book. Longman, London.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing . Journal of Second Language Writing 12(3), 267- 296 .

Ellis, R. ( 1998 ). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 32 , 39- 60.

Ellis, R. , Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H., (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context . System 36(3), 353-371.

Ferris, D. (1995). Teaching ESL composition students to become independent self- editors .   TESOL Journal 4(4), 18-22.

Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing . Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ferris, D. (2004). The grammar correction debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13(1) , 49-62.

Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA .Studies in Second Language acquisition 32(2) , 181-201.

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course . Modern Language Journal, 79: 329-344.

Frear, D. (2012). The effect of focused and unfocused direct written corrective feedback on a new piece of writing . Issues and Trends 3, 57-72.

Hartshorn, K., Evans, N., Merrill, P., Sudweeks, R.., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. (2010).Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 44(1), 84-109.

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London: Longman.

Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills . Modern Language Journal, 75: 305-313.

Krashen, S. (1985).The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment . The Modern Language Journal 66(2), 140-149.

Lyster, R. and Ranta , L. (1997) . Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

Rahimi, M . (2009) . The role of teacher's corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners' writing accuracy over time: is learner's mother tongue relevant? Reading and Writing, 22, 219-243.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41(2), 255-283.

Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 37(4), 556-569.

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23: 103-110.

Soori, A., Kafipour, R., &Soury, M. (2011). Effectiveness of Different Types of Direct CorrectiveFeedback on Correct use of English Articles among the Iranian EFL Students. European Journal of Social Sciences26 (4), 494-501.

Tomasello, M. and Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11, 385-395.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46(2), 327-369.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16: 255-272.

Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-p. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292-305.

Truscott, J. (2010). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System 38(2), 329-335.

Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2008a). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156, 279-296.

Van Beuningen, C. (2010a). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies 10 (2), 1-27.

Van Beuningen, C. G. (2011).  The effectiveness of comprehensive corrective feedback in second language writing. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.  (Defended April 19th 2011).

Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2012).  Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62 (1), 1-41.

Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 270-275.

Zareva, A., Schwanenflugel, P., & Nikolova, Y. (2005). Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(4), 567-595.