تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 10,005 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,620 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,320,486 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 55,370,297 |
The Impacts of Classroom Digital Literacy on EFL Iranian Teachers' Dynamic Assessment Quality Improvement | ||
Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 7، شماره 3، خرداد 2019، صفحه 22-42 اصل مقاله (4.34 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad Reza Raeisi* 1؛ Davood Mashhadi Heidar2؛ Mohammadreza Khodareza3 | ||
1English Language Department, English Faculty, Tonekabon Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran | ||
2Islamic Azad University of Tonekabon | ||
3English Language Department, English Facuty, Tonekabon Islamic Azad University, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of dynamic assessment as a processoriented mechanism on the digital classroom literacy of Iranian institute EFL teachers. The participants were 168 male and female institute EFL teachers to whom the teachers' digital classroom literacy was studied in two groups. A truncated form of classroom checklist was also given to the participants to assess their language proficiency. The participants were divided into 2 groups based on the researcher’s task. 1 experimental group (84 females in group A and 84 males in group B) and 1 control groups (21 females in group C and 21 males in group D). The dynamic assessment was based on the digital literacy model adopted from Nawaz and Kundi (2010) consisting of frequency of usage of computers, internet and digital technology in EFL classrooms. The control groups received the traditional assessment without modern technologies. The data were analyzed using one independent samples t tests, mean and the effect size. The results showed that the applicability of dynamic assessment considerably improved the digital literacy of the participants. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
applicability of dynamic assessment؛ digital literacy؛ possibilities؛ process-oriented mechanism | ||
مراجع | ||
Alavi, M., & Taheri, P. (2014). Examining the Role of Dynamic Assessment in the Development and Assessment of Listening Comprehension. ELT. 1, (2), 23-40. Beckingham, S., & Belshaw, D. (2012). Connecting the digital dots: 21st century digital literacies. Paper presented at the CITE Southampton Digital Litera Conference, Southampton. http://www.slideshare.net/dajbelshaw/connectingthe- digital-dots-withsue- beckingham-13325303 Birjandi, P. & Mosallanejad, P. (2011). An Overview of Testing and Assessment. From theory to Practice. Sepahan Publication. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. Broadfoot, P. (1996). Liberating the Learner through Assessment. In G. Claxton, T. Atkinson, M. Osborn and M. Wallace (Eds.). Liberating the Learner. London: Routledge. Bucking, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 45-54. Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 42-55. Chester, C., & Quilter, S. M. (1998). In-service teachers' perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38 (5), 635-647. Countryman, J. (1992). Writing to learn mathematics: Methods that work. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (2002). Teacher knowledge and understanding of students Mathematical learning. In L.D. English (Ed.). Handbook of international research In mathematics education (pp. 219- 240). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ezziane, Z. (2007). Information technology literacy: Implications on teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 175-191. Fraillon, J., et al (2013). International Computer and Information Literacy Study: Assessment Framework. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. IEA Secretariat. Garcia, E; Dunguy, K; Elbeltagi, I & Gilmour, N. (2013). An Evaluation of the Impact of Academic Staff Digital Literacy on the use of Technology: A Case Study of UK Higher Education. Barcelona, Spain. Gillen, J. & Barton, D. (2010) Digital Literacies. Research briefing for the TLRP-TEL (Teaching and Learning Research Programme – Technology Enhanced Learning). London: London Knowledge Lab, Institute of Education. Gipps, C. (1990). Assessment: A teacher's guide to the issues. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of Student Achievement. Seventh ed. Custom edition for the University of Alberta. Hashemian, M & Fadaei, B. (2013). Fostering EFL learners' autonomy in light of portfolio assessment: Exploring the potential impact of gender. IJLTR Journal. Urmia University. 1(2)Pp. 135-144. Lam, R., & Lee. I. (2010). Balancing the dual functions of Portfolio Assessment. ELT Journal, 64 (1), 54-64. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74. Latham-Koeing, Oxenden and Seligson (2013). American English File. USA. Oxford University Press. Nawaz & Kundi. (2013). Digital Literacy: An analysis of the Contemporary Paradigms. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 1 (2), pp. 19-29. Norton, B (2013). Identity, Literacy, and English Language Teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. Urmia. IJLTR. Urmia University Press. Plake B, S & Impara, C. (1993). Assessment Literacy Inventory Survey. University of Nebraska. Lincoln. https://www.surveymonkey.com Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French.Unpublished dissertation. Pennsylvania State University. Shepard, L., A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher. Vol, 29, No, &, pp, 4-14. Retrieved from: http.//www.jstor.org. Stiggins, R.J. (2002). Where is our assessment future and how can we get there from here? In R. W. Lissitz and W.D. Schafer (Eds.). Assessment in educational reform: Both means and ends (112-125). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Stiggins, R & Chappuis, J. C. (2005). Using Student-Involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps. Theory into practice, 441, 11-18. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/ Stobart, G. (2008) Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment, New York/London: Routledge. Susuwele-Banda, W., J. (2005). Classroom Assessment in Malawi: Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices in Mathematics. Blacksburg, Virginia. Dissertation unpublished. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence Maddalena Tarasa. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 3015–3022. Available on line at http//: www.sciencedirect.com 15 Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (eds.)., The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285).. New York: Plenum. Waycott, J et al. (2010). Digital Divides? Student and Staff Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies, Computers and Education, 54, pp. 1202-1211. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 174 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 341 |