تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 10,005 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,622 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 78,342,496 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 55,385,204 |
The effect of composted and non-composted poultry litter on survival and reproduction of Folsomia candida | ||
International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 9، شماره 1، خرداد 2020، صفحه 99-105 اصل مقاله (561.36 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30486/ijrowa.2020.1885804.1012 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Ana Paula Maccari1؛ Julia Corá Segat* 2؛ Manuela Testa3؛ Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche-Baretta4؛ Dilmar Baretta2 | ||
1Professora do Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina - IFSC. São Miguel do Oeste, SC, Brazil | ||
2Professor do Departamento de Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, SC, Brazil | ||
3Mestre em Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, SC, Brazil | ||
4Professora Área de Ciências Exatas e Ambientais, UNOCHAPECÓ, Chapecó, SC, Brazil | ||
چکیده | ||
Purpose The objective was to evaluate the effect of the application of composted and non-composted poultry litter, as fertilizer in agricultural areas, on the survival and reproduction of the springtails (Folsomia candida) through standardized ecotoxicological tests. Methods The treatments included in the application of composted and non-composted poultry litter on Entisol were in the following doses 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 t ha-1, for the lethality test, and 0, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 30, 40, 60 t ha-1 for the reproduction test. Results For the composted litter, the LC50 value was 76.45 t ha-1 and for EC50, it was 17.96 t ha-1. For the non-composted poultry litter, the values of LC50 was 43.12t ha-1 and EC50 value was 19.36 t ha-1. Conclusion The highest toxicity was observed in the non-composted litter, emphasizing the importance of stabilization of the organic compound before its use as fertilizer. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Animal production؛ Environmental evaluation؛ Organic fertilizer؛ Soil mesofauna | ||
مراجع | ||
Agyarko-Mintah E, Cowie A, Singh P B, Joseph S, Zwieten L V, Cowie A, Harden S, Smillie R (2016a) Biochar increases nitrogen retention and lowers greenhouse gas emissions when added to composting poultry litter. Waste Manag 61: 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. wasman.2016.11.027
Agyarko-Mintah E, Cowie A, Zwieten L V, Singh B P, Smillie R, Harden S, Fornasier F (2016b) Biochar lowers ammonia emission and improves nitrogen retention in poultry litter composting. Waste Manag 61: 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.009
Alves M V, Santos J C P, Gois D T, Alberton J V, Baretta D (2008) Macrofauna do solo influenciada pelo uso de fertilizantes químicos e dejetos de suínos no Oeste do Estado de Santa Catarina. Rev. Bras. de Ciênc. do Solo 32: 589-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832008000200014
Andrés P, Domene X (2005) Ecotoxicological and fertilizing effects of dewatered, composted and dry sewage sludge on soil mesofauna: A TME experiment. Ecotoxicol 14: 545–557. https://doi:10.1007/s10646-005-0006-8
Arthur E, Tuller M, Moldrup P, Jonge L W (2015) Effects of biochar and manure amendments on water vapor sorption in a sandy loam soil. Geoderma 243–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.001
Baretta D, Santos J C P, Mafra A L, Wildner L P, Miquelluti D J (2003) Fauna edáfica avaliada por armadilhas de catação manual afetada pelo manejo do solo na região Oeste Catarinense. Ciências Agrovet 2: 97-106.
Cardoso E J B N, Vasconcellos R L F, Bini D, Miyauchi M Y H, Santos C A, Alves P R L, Paula A M, Nakatani A S, Pereira J M, Nogueira M A (2013) Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. Scientia Agric 70: 274–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009
Domene X, Alcañiz J M, Andrés P (2007) Ecotoxicological of organic wastes using the soil collembolan Folsomia candida. Appl. Soil Ecol 35: 461 – 472. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.10.004
Domene X, Ramirez W, Mattana S, Alcañiz J M, Andrés p (2008) Ecological risk assessment of organic waste amendments using the species sensitivity distribution from a soil organisms test battery. Environ. Pollut 155: 227-236. https://doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.001
Domene X, Colón J, Uras M V, Izquierdo R, Àvila A, Alcañiz J M (2010) Role of soil properties in sewage sludge
toxicity to soil collembolans. Soil Biol. Biochem 42: 1982–1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.019
Dunlop M W, Blackall P J, Stuetz R M (2016) Odour emissions from poultry litter - review litter properties, odour formation and odorant emissions from porous materials. J. of Environ. Manag 177: 306–319. http://doi: 10. 1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.009
Embrapa Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (2006) Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Embrapa Produção de Informação, 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.
Garcia M (2004) Effects of pesticides on soil fauna: Development of ecotoxicological test methods for tropical regions.– Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät, Universidade de Bonn.
Gilmour J T, Koehler M A, Cabrera L, Szajdak L, Moore P A Jr (2004) Alum treatment of poultry litter: decomposition and nitrogen dynamics. J. of Environ. Qual 33: 402-405. https://doi:10.2134/jeq2004.4020
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1993) Soil quality - determination of dry matter and water content on a mass basis - Gravimetric method. ISO 11465. Geneve, Switzerland.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1998) Soil quality – inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. ISO 11268-2. Geneve, Switzerland.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1999) Soil quality – inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutants. ISO 11267. Geneve, Switzerland.
Jänsch S, Amorim M, Römbke J (2005) Identification of the ecological requirements of important terrestrial ecotoxicological test species. Environ. Rev 13: 51 - 83. https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-007
Maccari A P, Baretta D, Paiano D, Leston S, Freitas A, Ramos F, Sousa J P, Klauberg-Filho O (2016) Ecotoxicological effects of pig manure on Folsomia candida in subtropical Brazilian soils. J. of Hazard. Mater 314: 113–120. https://doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.013
Marín O L Z, Tinôco I F F, Saraz J A O, Souza C F, Vieira M F A (2015) Evaluation of the fertilizer and contamination potential of different broiler litter types subjected to various use cycles. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía. 68: 7637 – 7646. dx.doi.org/10.15446/ rfnam.v68n2.50967
Martin V, Stanislav M (2010) Using an ecotoxicological soil test battery for testing anaerobically-digested sludge for application on agricultural land. In: Marktredwitzer Bodenschutztage, Bodenschutz in Europa 230: 212 – 217.
Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Baran A (2016) Effect of poultry litter biochar on soil enzymatic activity, ecotoxicity and plant growth. Appl. Soil Ecol 105: 144 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.006
Natal-Da-Luz T, Römbke J, Sousa J P (2008) Avoidance tests in site-specific risk assessment - influence of soil properties on the avoidance response of Collembola and earthworms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 27: 1112 – 1117. https://doi:10.1897/07-386.1
Oliveira J B (2008) Pedologia aplicada. Piracicaba: FEALQ.
Oviedo-Rondón E O (2008) Tecnologias para mitigar o impacto ambiental da produção de frangos de corte. Rev. Bras. de Zootec 37: 239 – 252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1516-35982008001300028
Pitta C S R, Adami P F, Pelissari A, Assmann T S, Franchin M F, Cassol L C, Sartor L R (2012) Year-round poultry litter decomposition and n, P, K and Ca Release. Rev. Bras. de Ciênc. do Solo 36: 1043 – 1053. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000300034
Reichert J M, Suzuki L E A S, Reinert D J, Horn R, Hakansson I (2009) Reference bulk density and critical degree-of-compactness for no-till crop production in subtropical highly weathered soils. Soil Tillage Res 102: 242-254.
Renaud M, Chelinho S, Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Palma P, Sousa J P, Natal-da-Luz T (2017) Organic wastes as soil amendments – effects assessment towards soil invertebrates. J. Hazard. Mater 330: 149–156. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.052
Sales L E O, Carneiro M A C, Severiano E C, Oliveira G C, Ferreira M M (2010) Qualidade física de Neossolo Quartzarênico submetido a diferentes sistemas de uso agrícola. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 34. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/S1413-70542010000300020
Segat J C, Alves P R L, Baretta, D, Cardoso E J B (2015) Ecotoxicological evaluation of swine manure disposal on tropical soils in Brazil. Ecotoxicol. and Environ 122: 91-97. https://doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.017
Spera S T, Reatto A, Martins E de S, Correia J R, Cunha T J F (1999) Solos areno-quartzosos no cerrado: características, problemas e limitações ao uso. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados 7: 48.
Tedesco M J, Gianello C, Bissani C A, Bohnen H, Volkweiss S J (1995) Análises de solo, plantas e outros materiais. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Departamento de Solos, UFRGS.
Terzich M, Pope M J, Cherry T E, Hollinger J (2000) Survey of pathogens in poultry litter in the United States. J. Appl. Poult. Res 9: 287-291. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/ 9.3.287 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 865 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 738 |