A Simulation Model for Estimating Herbage Standing Crop and Grazing Capacity in Sar Ali-Abad Summer Rangelands of Golestan Province, Iran

Journal of Rangeland Science

مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 4، دی 2020، صفحه 383-392   

نوع مقاله: Research and Full Length Article

نویسندگان

Ali Hosseini¹؛ Nafise Fakhar izadi²؛ Mansoor Mesdaghi^{* 3}

¹Research Institute of Natural Resouces, Golestan Branch

²Ferdowsi University, Mashhad,Iran

³Ferdousi University

چکیده

To find an accurate and rapid method of estimating herbage crop, Double Sampling (DS), Comparative Yield (CY), and clipping and weighing (CW) methods were applied to a summer rangeland in North-eastern Alborz Mountains, Iran. The method was called SMFY (Simulation Model of Forage Yield) to emphasize the statistical aspects of simulated model. In representative stands five 1-m² reference plots were chosen to represent the ranges of standing crop. Using a systematic-random design, 180 1-m² plots were ranked against the reference plots for CY, visually estimated for DS, and subsequently, all of them were Clipped and Weighed (CW). After clipping and weighing 5 reference plots with 6 replications for CY and estimating and clipping 37 plots for DS, regression lines were plotted between the estimated, ranked, and clipped plots. This study was conducted during 2011-13. There was high correlation (0.90-0.99) for DS and CY, so the estimated and ranked data were corrected based on the regression equations. There were strong linear relationships between the corrected and clipped data for the DS and CY methodswhich confirmed the suitability of both methods against the CW, so all of 180 estimated plots were corrected and were compared by ANOVA. The non-significant F for CY, DS, and CW confirmed the high efficiency of DS and CY, so based on the estimated production, grazing capacity of study area was calculated. Preferring one of these methods depends on further research in time and cost efficiency of DS and CY. Available DM of 389.75 kg/ha support 6.5 AUM per ha and for the grazing period of 4 months, each hectare of this rangeland can carry on 1.62 AU per ha. The current stocking rate of study area is about 0.82 AU per hectare which was suitable based on carrying capacity of study area.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Clipping and Weighing؛ Double sampling؛ Comparative method؛ Animal-unit-months

مراجع

Ahmad, G. and Bonham, C.D., 1982. Optimum allocation in multivariate double sampling for biomass estimation. J. Range Manage. 36: 777-779.

Arzani, H. and King, G., 1988. A double sampling method for estimating forage production from cover measurement, Dept. of wood and Animal Science, University of New South Wales. 203 pp.

Benkobi, I., Uresk, D. W., Schenbeckand, G., and King, R. M., 2000. Protocol for monitoring standing crop in grassland using visual obstruction. J. Range. Manage. 53: 627-633.

Blankenship, J. O. and Smith, D.R. 1966. Indirect estimation of standing crop. Journal of Range Management, 9:74-77.

Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. Wiley and Sons, New York. 246 pp.

Chambers, J.O., and Brown. R. W. 1983. Methods for vegetation sampling and analysis on re-vegetated mined lands. Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Den. Tech. Rep. INT-151.

Cook, C. W., and Stubbendieck. J. 1986. Range research: Basic problems and techniques. Society for Range Management, Denver, Colorado. USA

Despain, D. W. and Smith, E. L 1987. The comparative yield method for estimating range production. In G. B. Ruyle (Ed.). Some methods for monitoring rangelands and other natural area vegetation. The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension. Pub. 190043. Tucson, Arizona

Flombaum, P. and Sala, O.E. 2007. A non-destructive and rapid method to estimate biomass and above ground net primary production. Journal of Arid Environments. 69.352-358.

Friedel, M. H., Chewings, V. H. and Bastin. G. N. 1988. The use of comparative yield and dry-weight-rank techniques for monitoring arid rangelands. J. Range Manage. 41:430-435.

Gholinejad, B., PourBabaei, H., Farajollahi, C. A, and Parvane, E., 2012. Assessment and comparison of different methods for estimating forage production (Case Study: Rangeland of Kurdistan Province). Journal of Rangeland Science, 2(2): 483-489

Gholami Baghi, N., Sepehri, A., Barani, H, and Mahini, S., 2013. Estimating Plant Biomass using Non-Destructive Parameters in Arid Regions (Case Study: Inche-Broun Winter Rangelands, Golestan, Iran) Journal of Rangeland Science, 3(4): 295-301.

Haydock, K. P., and Show, W. K. 1975. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of    pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb. 15:663-670.

Holechek, J.L., Pieper, R.D., and Herbel, C.H. 2011. Range management: principle and practices. 6^th ed. Prentice- Hall. New Jercy. 444 pp.

Hosseini, S. A., Mesdaghi, M., Parsaei, L. and Pambukhchyan. C. 2013. Traditional system of range exploitation in summer rangelands of southern steppe region of Golestan province, Iran (Case study: Sar Ali-abad pastoral settlements). IX International Rangeland Congress. RioDoJaneiro, Argentina

Hosseini S. A., Mesdaghi M., Pambokhchyan S. 2012. Comparing 3 method forage estimation in summer   rangelands. Iranian journal of range and desert research. 18:637-651 (In Persian).

Hosseini, S. A. 2015. The effect of range vegetation cover on raising sheep products under the condition of                 Gorgan region. PhD. Dissertation. National Agrarian University of Armenia. 118pp.

Krebs, J. C. 1999. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins. College Publisher. U.S.A.

Mesdaghi, M. 2011. Statistical and regression methods: A applied approach to plant and animal Sciences. Univ. of Emam Reza, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).

Mesdaghi, M. 1993. Management of Iranian’s rangeland. Razavi Cultural Foundation, Mashhad, Iran 215 pp. (In Persian)

Mesdaghi, M. 2015. Rangeland management in Iran, 7^th Edition, Razavi Cultural Foundation, Mashhad, Iran 326 pp. (In Persian).

Mesdaghi, M., and Ajami, S., 1997. Comparison of methods used to estimate biomass in Chaharbagh rangelands of Gorgan, Iran. Jour. Agric. Scie. & Natu. Reso. 4(4): 15-26. (In Persian).

Milner, C. and Hughes, R. E., 1968. Method of the measurement of primary production of grassland Black well. Sci., Pub 1, Oxford, England.

Nyerges, E. 1980. Traditional pastoralism: An evolutionary perspective. In: expedition. The University Museum Magazine of Archaeology/Anthropology. Univ. of Pennsylvania. Vol. 22. No.4. USA.

Pabot, H. 1967. Pasture development and improvement through botanical and ecological studies. FAO. 2311.

Pechanec, J.F. and pickford, G. D., 1937. A weight estimate method for determination of range of pasture production. J. Amer.Soc. Agron, 29: 894 –904.

Reich, R. M., Bonham, C. B. and Remington, K. K. 1993. Double Sampling Revised. J. Range Manage. 49: 88-90.

Sadeghinia, M., Arzani, H., and Baghestani Maibodi N. 2003. Comparison of different methods to estimate plant production in a few shrub species (Case study: rangeland of Yazd and Isfahan province). Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 61:28-32. (In Persian).

Vermeire, L.T., Ganguli, A.C., and Gillen, R.L. 2002. A robust model for estimating standing crop across vegetation types, Journal of Range Management, 55:494-497.

Van Dyne G., Vogel, W., and Fisser, H., 1963. Influence of small plot size and shape on range herbage production estimates. Ecology, 44: 746-759.

Wilm,, H. G., Costello, D. F., and Klipple, G. E. 1944. Estimating forage yield by double sampling method. Agron. Jour. 36: 194-203.