نقش شفافیت آراء نمایندگان در کارآمدی فرایند قانون گذاری پارلمان های اتحادیه اروپا، انگلستان، ایتالیا و ایران

فصلنامه مطالعات روابط بین الملل

مقاله 3، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 50، شهریور 1399، صفحه 75-105   

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

نویسندگان

محمد باقر بهرامی¹؛ فریدون اکبر زاده^{* 2}؛ روح اله شهابی²؛ شیوا جلال پور²

¹گروه علوم سیاسی، واحد بین الملل خرمشهر-خلیج فارس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرمشهر، ایران

²استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

شفافیت در آشکار شدن چگونگی تصمیم گیری حاکمان، در عرصه قدرت به عنوان شاخصی از کیفیت سیاست و حکمرانی، یکی از پایه های اصلی دمکراسی و جمهوریت و از عوامل ارزیابی اجتماعی در ایجاد حکمرانی مطلوب است. شفافیت بعنوان یکی از ابزارهای نظارت مردمی بر پارلمان و تاثیرگذار بر فرایند تصمیم گیری در کشورها است و می تواند بستر تحول در عرصه قانون گذاری را آماده کرده و فرصتی برای آغاز اصلاحات ساختاری در بخش های مختلف جامعه باشد. سوال اصلی مقاله بدین ترتیب مطرح می شود که شفافیت آراء نمایندگان پارلمان های اروپا و ایران چه نقشی در کارآمدی مجلس از منظر حکمرانی مطلوب دارد؟ در پاسخ می توان این فرضیه را مطرح نمود که به نظر می رسد شفافیت آراء نمایندگان پارلمان های اروپا و ایران می تواند نقشی راهبردی در تحقق حق ذاتی مردم در آگاهی از حقوق شهروندی، نظارت بر عملکرد نمایندگان خود و آگاهی از فرایند قانون گذاری ایفا کند و در نهایت سلامتی و کارآیی عملکرد مجالس ایران و اتحادیه اروپا را تضمین نماید. نتیجه گیری مقاله نهایتاً بر آن است که مقوله شفافیت نه فقط در بعد داخلی بلکه در بعد بین الملل نیز حائز اهمیت بوده و تعامل میان این دو میتواند به کارآمدی بیشتر پارلمانها یاری رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شفافیت آراء نمایندگان؛ مجلس شورای اسلامی؛ حکمرانی مطلوب؛ کارآمدی؛ پارلمان اروپا

مراجع

• کاتم، مارتا و دیگران (1386). مقدمه ای بر روانشناسی سیاسی، مترجمین سیدکمال خرازی و جواد علاقبند راد، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
• مشیرزاده، حمیرا (1396). مبانی نظری تبیین و تحلیل سیاست خارجی، تهران: سمت.
• Alexander, M. G., Brewer, M. B., & Hermann, R. K., (1999). Images and Affect: A Functional Analysis of Out-Group Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 78-93.
• Babazadeh Sangar, et al., (2013). Participation Anticipating in Elections Using Data Mining Methods. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics, 2(2), 47-59.
• Bar-Tal, D., (2002). The (Social) Psychological Legacy for Political Psychology. In: K. R. Monroe, (Ed.). Political Psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 173-191.
• (2009, June 2). Obama Interview: The Transcript. BBC. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/news/2009/06/090602_obama_transcript.shtml [Accessed 10 August 2019]
• Boulding, K. E., (1959). National Images and International Systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120-131.
• (2009, June 16). Transcript: Obama on the Economy, Iran. CNBC. Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/id/31393724 [Accessed 16 August 2019]
• Darvich-Kodjouri, D., (1976). Image and Perception in International Relations: A Case Study of Relationship between Iran and the Great Powers, 1919-1953. The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Political Science, Miami University.
• Friedman, T. L., (2015, April 5). Iran and the Obama Doctrine. The New York Times, Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/opinion/thomas-friedman-the-obama-doctrine-and-iran-interview.html [Accessed 26 Septemper 2018]
• Goldberg, J., (2016, April 29). The Obama Doctrine. The Atlantic, Available from: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/theobama-doctrine/471525/ [Accessed 9 May 2018]
• Hakovirta, H., (1976). Duality of Target and Image Links as Problems of Image Policy: The Case of Finland. University of Tampere, Institute of Political Science.
• Herrmann, R. K., (2013). Perceptions and Image Theory in International Relations. In: L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy. The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. 2nd ed., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 334-363.
• Herrmann, R. K. et al., (1997). Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata. International Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 403-433.
• Herrmann, R. K., & Fischerkeller, M. P., (1995). Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive–Strategic Research after the Cold War. International Organization, 49(3), 415-450.
• Herrmann, R. (1988). The empirical challenge of the cognitive revolution: A strategy for drawing inferences about perceptions. International Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 175-203.
• Herrmann, R. (1986). The power of perceptions in foreign-policy decision making: Do views of the Soviet Union determine the policy choices of American leaders?. American Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 841-875.
• Hermann, M. G., (1980). Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7-46.
• Holsti, O. R., (1976). Foreign Policy Viewed Cognitively. In: R. Axelrod. (Ed.). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton university press.
• Jervis, R., (2017). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. New Edition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Kaufman, R. G., (2016). Dangerous Doctrine: How Obama’s Grand Strategy Weakened America. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
• Kim, JM., (2014). Images of China in U.S. Foreign Policy Making. Master’s Thesis, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.
• Knoke, D., (2015). Emerging Trends in Social Network Analysis of Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1-15. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0106 [Accessed 10 May 2018]
• Monroe, B. L., et al., (2015). No! Formal Theory, Causal Inference, and Big Data Are Not Contradictory Trends in Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 71-74.
• Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T., (2014). Political Campaigns and Big Data. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 51-74.
• Norris, M., and Inskeep, S., (2009, June 1). Transcript: Obama's Full Interview with NPR. National Public Radio. Available from: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104806528 [Accessed 28 August 2019]
• (2014). Transcript: President Obama's Full NPR Interview. National Public Radio. Available from: https://www.npr.org/2014/12/29/372485968/transcript-president-obamas-full-npr-interview [Accessed 14 September 2019]
• Obama, B., (2015, August 05). Remarks by the President on the Iran Nuclear Deal. The White House. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/08/05/remarks-president-iran-nuclear-deal [Accessed 21 May 2019]
• O'Reilly, K. P., (2007). Perceiving Rogue States: The Use of the “Rogue State” Concept by US Foreign Policy Elites. Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(4), 295-315.
• Phillips, M. (2009, June 20). The President's Statement on Iran. The White House, Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2009/06/20/presidents-statement-iran [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• Pinker, S., (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Group.
• Rahman, H., (Ed.). (2009). Social and Political Implications of Data Mining: Knowledge Management in E-Government. United States of America: IGI Global.
• Renshon, J., (2009). When Public Statements Reveal Private Beliefs: Assessing Operational Codes at a Distance. Political Psychology, 30(4), 649-661.
• Rosati, J. A., (1995). A Cognitive Approach to the Study of Foreign Policy. In: L. Neack., J. A. K. Hey., & P. J. Haney. (Eds.). Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 49-70.
• Rusi, A., (1988). Image Research and Image Politics in International Relations, Transformation of Power Politics in the Television Age. Cooperation and Conflict, 23(1), 29-42.
• Schafer, M., (1997). Images and Policy Preferences. Political Psychology, 18(4), 813-829.
• The White House. (2009 a). Press Conference by the President. The White House, February 09, 2009. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/press-conference-president [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• The White House. (2009 b). Statements by President Obama French President Sarkozy and British Prime Minister Brown on Iranian Nuclear Facility. The White House, September 25, 2009. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2009/09/25/statements-president-obama-french-president-sarkozy-and-british-prime-mi [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• The White House. (2010 a). Remarks by the President at Signing of the Iran Sanctions Act. The White House, July 01, 2010. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-signing-iran-sanctions-act [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• The White House. (2010 b). Remarks by the President on United Nations Security Council Resolution on Iran Sanctions. The White House, June 09, 2010. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-united-nations-security-council-resolution-iran-sanctions [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• The White House. (2015 a). Press Conference by the President. The White House, July 15, 2015. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/07/15/press-conference-president [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• The White House. (2015 b). Statement by the President on the Framework to Prevent Iran from Obtaining a Nuclear Weapon. The White House, April 02, 2015. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/02/statement-president-framework-prevent-iran-obtaining-nuclear-weapon [Accessed 14 May 2019]
• Young, M. D. and Schafer, M., (1998). Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations. Mershon International Studies Review, 42(1), 63-96.