Modeling the Causes of Business Failure Using Audit Variables: an Interpretive Structural Approach (a case study of agricultural firms in the Tehran Stock Exchange)

Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization Journal

مقاله 2، دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، شهریور 2021، صفحه 19-36   

نوع مقاله: Original Research

نویسندگان

Vahid Farham¹؛ Hossein Shafiee^{* 2}؛ Abas Sheybani Tazaroji¹

¹Department of Accounting, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran

²Department of Accounting, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran,

چکیده

Interpretive structural modeling is a method for designing systems, especially accounting and management systems. This approach was first introduced by Warfield and has recently been frequently used by researchers in studies for modeling the relationships between variables. This approach makes it possible for the researcher to illustrate the complex relationships between the variables in a rather complex circumstance. It is now considered to be an important tool for organizing and directing the complexity of the relationships between variables. At first, this technique identifies the variables and then specifies the contextual relationships between the variables using the knowledge of experts and their experiences, and finally, it creates a multi-layered structural model. The present study is an applied research of the mixed type in terms of its purpose. In this study, the aforementioned technique was used to structure the factors explaining the causes of business failure (bankruptcy) of agricultural firms in the Tehran Stock Exchange. For this purpose, experts in this field (auditing-financial managers) in the agricultural firms accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. In addition, 12 variables of audit report disclosures were identified as factors explaining the business failure. Then, the rate of effectiveness of these variables on one another in the model explaining business failure was coded using the initial access matrix. Finally, they were leveled using the final matrix. The results of interpretive structural modeling showed that the factors explaining business failure were modeled at six levels, with the type of auditing opinion at the highest level and had a greater impact on other factors. The highest degree of effectiveness was associated with other disclosures related to environmental-economic-regulatory factors which were at the lower levels. Therefore, it can be claimed that the disclosures associated with environmental-economic-regulatory factors explained the causes of business failure better than other audit variables.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Business failure؛ audit report disclosures؛ interpretive structural equations؛ agricultural firms accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange

مراجع

• Mehrani S. & Mehrani K. & Monsefi Y. & Karami G. (2005), Implication Zmijewski & Shirata bankruptcy predictioan models in Tehran Stock Exchange, Accounting and Auditing Review, 41(12): 105-131.
• Amini P. (2006), Investigating the feasibility of using the Fulmer model to estimate the bankruptcy of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Master Thesis, Tehran: Accounting, Tarbiat Modares University, 9(1): 66-78.
• Agarwal A. & Shankar R. & Tiwari M. (2006), Modeling Agility of supply chain, Industrial Marketing Manage Ment, 36(1): 443- 457.
• Makian N. & Karimi Takloo S. (2010), Predicting the bankruptcy of manufacturing companies using artificial neural networks, Quantitative Economics Quarterly, 6(1): 129-144.
• Abzari M. & Mirshams Shahshahani M. & Rasoulzadeh M. (2001), Application of Altman model to determine the bankruptcy status of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (Textile and Basic Metals Industries), Master Thesis, Faculty of Management, Isfahan: University of Isfahan, 16(2): 118-130.
• Br´edart X. (2014), Bankruptcy prediction model using neural networks, Accounting and Finance Research, 3(2): 124-128
• Agarwal V. & Taffler R. (2007), Twenty-five years of the Taffler Z-score model: Does it really have predictive ability?  Accounting and Business Research, 37(4): 285-300.
• Rama krishnan S. & Mirzaei M. & Bekri M. (2015), Corporate default prediction with adaboost and bagging classifiers, Journal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 73(2): 45-50.
• Yarifard R. (2019), Investigation of Bankruptcy Prediction Models (Fulmer and Spring Models) in Tehran Stock Exchange, Master Thesis in Accounting, Mazandaran: University of Mazandaran, 8(6): 147-160.
• Azar A. (2013), Soft Operations Research, Tehran: Industrial Management Organization Publications, 15(2): 29-40.
• Takata Y. & Hosaka T. & Ohnuma H. (2017), Boosting approach to early bankruptcy prediction from multiple-year financial statements, Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Business and Social Studies, 3(2): 66-76.
• Barboza F. & Kimura H. & Altman E. (2017), “Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction”, Expert Systems with Applications, 8(3): 405-417.
• Salehi N. & Azimi Yancheshmeh M. (2016), Comparative investigate of Hazard model and traditional models for bankruptcy predication, Quarterly Financial Accounting Journal, 2(1): 33-46.
• Campbell J. & Hilscher Y. & Szilagyi J. (2008), In search of distress risk, Journal of Finance, 63(6): 2899-2939.
• Ra'ei R. & Fallahpour S. (2008), Application of support vector machine in predicting financial distress of companies using financial ratios, Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 53(15): 17-34.
• Shumway T. (2001), Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model, The Journal of Business, 74(1): 101-124.
• Talibnia A. (2016), Predicting the financial distress of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange using Bayesian networks, Quarterly Journal of Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 26(16): 59-78.
• Farajzadeh Dehkordi H. (2007), Application of Genetic Algorithm in Bankruptcy Prediction. Master Thesis, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University, 17(2): 88-96.
• Iturriaga F. & Sanz I. (2015), Bankruptcy visualization and prediction using neural networks: A study of US commercial banks, Expert Systems with applications, 42(6): 2857-2869.
• Back B. & Laitinen T. & Sere K. (2019), Neural networks and genetic algorithms for bankruptcy predictions, Expert Systems with Applications, 11(4): 407- 413.
• Fallahpour S. & Reza R. (2004), Predicting the financial distress of companies using artificial neural networks, Financial Research, 17(1): 39-69.
• Porzamani Z. (2009), Predicting the economic and financial status of companies through financial ratios based on profitability, cash flows and growth, The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 5(1): 93-115.
• Sharma H. & Gupta A. (2017), The Objetives of Waste Management in India: a Future Inquiry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(5): 285-309.
• Huang J. & Tzeng G. (2005), Ong Ch.; Multidimensional Data in Multidimensional Scaling Using the Analytic Network Process; Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(8): 115-129.
• Faisal M. & Banwat D. & Shankar R. (2007), InforMation risks Management in Supply Chain: An assessment and mitigation framework, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(6), 677-699.
• Warfield J. (1974), Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Modeling; IEEE Trans, Systems Man Cybernet, 5(4): 11-29.
• Ravi T. & Shankar R. & Tiwari M. (2005), Productiity Improvement of a Computer Hardware Supply Chain, International Journal of Production and Performance Measurement, 54(4): 239-255.
• Watson R. (1978), Interpretive Structural Modeling- A useful tool for Worth Assessment? Technological Forcasting and Social Change, 11(6): 165-185.