Common Set of Weights Model in the Presence of Non-homogeneous Outputs

Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications

مقاله 6، دوره 7، شماره 4، دی 2022، صفحه 917-928   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/amfa.2021.1900344.1431

نویسندگان

Mahnaz Ahadzadeh Namin^* ؛ Elaheh Khamseh

Department of Mathematics, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

In order to evaluate the companies of the cement industry active in the Tehran Stock Exchange (Iran), it is first necessary to identify the indicators of the industry. Note that some of the indicator values provided by the Exchange Organization to the users may have been lost for any reason. All of the existing models for calculating the efficiency of such units calculate the weight of the indicators related to each unit under evaluation independent of the weight of other units. So, in this study, researchers decided to develop a common set of weight models and propose a model that evaluates efficiency in the presence of heterogeneity decision-making units (DMUs) based on the common set of weight models. Finally, the proposed model evaluates 25 cement industry companies in the presence of heterogeneity DMUs of indicators and the results are being analyzed.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Data Envelopment Analysis؛ Efficiency؛ Non-homogeneous DMUs؛ Common Set of Weights

مراجع

[1] Banker, A., Charnes, R., Cooper, W., Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale in Data Envelopment Analysis, S. M. Science, And N. Sep, 2012, 30(9), P. 1078–1092. Doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

[2] Cook, W.D., Harrison, J., Rouse, P., Zhu J., Relative efficiency measurement: The problem of a missing output in a subset of decision-making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res, 2012, 220(1), P. 79–84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.022

[3] Cook W.D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., Zhu, J., Data Envelopment Analysis with Nonhomogeneous DMU, Operations Research, 2013, 61(3), P. 666-676. Doi: 10.1287/opre.2013.1173

[4] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2(6), P. 429–444. Doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

[5] Du, J., Chen, Y., Huo, J., DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks, Omega, 2015, 56, P. 122-132. Doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.001

[6] Ekinci, E., Kazancoglu, Y., Mangla, S.K., Using system dynamics to assess the environmental management of cement industry in streaming data context, Journal Pre-proof, 2020, 715, P. 1-42. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136948

[7] Hatami-Marbini, A., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.,  Agrell, J., Tavana, M., Mohammadi, F., Extended Symmetric and Asymmetric Weight Assignment Methods in Data Envelopment Analysis, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2015, 87, 621-631. Doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.06.014

[8] Izadikhah, M., Financial Assessment of Banks and Financial Institutes in Stock Exchange by Means of an Enhanced Two stage DEA Model, Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2021, 6(2), P. 207-232. Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2020.1910507.1491

[9] Ji, X., J. Wu, Zhu, Q., Sun, J., Using a hybrid heterogeneous DEA method to benchmark china’s sustainable urbanization: an empirical study, Analysis of Operations Research, 2019, 278, P. 1-55. Doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2855-6

[10] Jahanshahloo, G., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Maddahi, R., Ebrahimnejad, A., Ranking non-extreme efficient units based on super efficiency method in the presence of undesirable outputs: a DEA approach, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2013, 6(1), P. 83 – 95. Doi: 10.1504/IJADS.2013.052626

[11] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Ghobadi, S., Using Enhanced Russell Model to Solve Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis Problems, Scientific World Journal, 2014, 14, P. 1-10. Doi: 10.1155/2014/571896

[12] Li, W., Liang, L., Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations, European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 254(3), P. 946-956. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.063

[13] Li, L.G., Zhuo, Z.Y., Kwan, A.K.H., Zhang T.S., Lu, D.G., Cementing efficiency factors of ceramic polishing residue in compressive strength and chloride resistance of mortar, Powder Technology, 2020, 367, P. 163-171. Doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.050

[14] Li, L. G, Zheng, J. Z., Ng, P. L., Kwan, A. K. H., Synergistic cementing efficiencies of nano-silica and micro-silica in carbonation resistance and sportively of concrete, Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 33, P. 1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101862

[15] Mombini, E., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Saraj, M., The sustainability radius of the cost efficiency in Interval Data Envelopment Analysis: A case study from Tehran Stocks, Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2022, 7(2), P. 279-291. Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2021.1917327.1528

[16] Podinovski, V. V., Olesen, O. B., Sarrico, C. S., Nonparametric production technologies with multiple component processes, Operations Research, 2017, 66(1), P.282-300. Doi: 10.1287/opre.2017.1667

[17] Seyed Esmaeili, F., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Data Envelopment Analysis with Fixed Inputs, Undesirable Outputs and Negative Data, Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science, 2017, 1, P. 1-6. Doi: 10.5899/2017/dea-00140

[18] Thompson RG., PS. Dharmapala, Thrall RM., Importance for DEA of zeros in data, multipliers, and solutions, J. Production Anal, 1993, 4(4), P. 379–390. Doi: 10.1007/BF01073546

[19] Tohidi, G., Tohidnia, S., Measuring the Interval industry cost efficiency score in DEA. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2022, 7(2), P. 379-390. Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2020.1880449.1308

[20] Zatira, D., Puspitasari, R., Analysis of Financial Health Level On Financial Performance in Cement Companies Listed On the Indonesian Stock Exchange (Idx), Journal Economic and Basins, 2020, 18(3), P. 1-12. Doi: 10.31253/pe.v18i3.401

[21] Wu, J., Li, M., Zhu, Q., Zhou, Z., Liang, l., Energy and Environmental Efficiency Measurement of China’s Industrial Sectors: a DEA Model with Non-Homogeneous Inputs and Outputs, Energy Economics, 2019, 78, P.468-480. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.036