The Effects of Granting Subsidies to Agricultural Inputs on Iranian Households' Welfare and Environment by Emphasis on Computable General Equilibrium Model

Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization Journal

مقاله 12، دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 9، شهریور 2021، صفحه 153-176   

نوع مقاله: Original Research

نویسندگان

Fariba Azik¹؛ Seyed Nematollah Mousavi^{* 2}؛ Bahaeddin Najafi³

¹Agricultural Economics, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

²Department of Agricultural Economics, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

³Department of Agricultural Economics, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran,

چکیده

This study seeks to investigate all the direct and indirect effects of agricultural input subsidies on agricultural production using the computable general equilibrium method, the effect of agricultural input prices and subsidies on macroeconomic variables, food security, household welfare, and the environment. The results showed that the reform of subsidies in the agricultural sector by reducing agricultural production and rising prices, will reduce the final demand for agricultural products, especially basic products for households, and therefore will endanger food security. The findings also indicate that by applying the desired scenarios, the production of fisheries sectors decreases more than other production sectors. The reduction of subsidies paid to the agricultural sector also leads to a decrease in the welfare of urban and rural consumers Is. In addition, reducing subsidies in the agricultural sector in the future will lead to a reduction in environmental pollution. Due to the low income of farmers, if subsidies are reduced in this sector, producers will not be able to change technology, and therefore with increasing production costs, production in the agricultural sector has decreased more sharply than other sectors, and in this regard support the agricultural sector, is necessary. In addition, it is suggested that the subsidy be reduced gradually, along with the payment of cash subsidies to farmers, especially villagers.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Subsidy؛ Calculable General Balance Model؛ Food Security؛ Household Welfare؛ Pollution

مراجع

Abadi J. & Abadi A. (2019), Statistical features of Iranian subsidies, The office of economic studies associated with the center of parliament surveys, 12(5): 236-140.

- Zolnour H. (2002), Studying and making reforms in commercial strategies, The professional institute for research in planning and development, 13(4): 33-39.

- Behkish M. (2020), Spatial modeling of agrarian subsidy payment as an input for evaluating changes of ecosystem services, Joumal of Ecological Complexity, 8(4): 199-206.

- Mojaver Husseini F. (2006), Studying the effects of Islamic Republic of Iran's joining to World Trade Organization using CGE model, Research journal of commerce, 93(10): 51-58.

- Bayes A. & Parton K. & Piggott R. (2009), Combined price support and fertilizer subsidy policies for food self-sufficiency a case study of rice in Bangladesh. Joumal of Food Policy, 15(1): 12-21.

- Parmeh Z. (2014), Studying apparent subsidies and estimate latent subsidies in Iranian economy, Commercial studies, 12(3): 80-87.

- Alizade M. (2010), An introduction to economic effects of reforms in subsidy, The journal of city economy, 11(7): 101-109.

- Kubursi A. (2015), Lebanon's agricultural potential: A policy analysis matrix approach, 26(3): 77-84.

- Amini R. (2018), An analysis of reforms of subsidies to agriculture, Journal of Dehyariha, 32(6): 44-51.

- Kehoe T. & Serra Puche J. (2018), A general equilibrium analysis of price controls and subsidies on food in Mexico, Joumal of Development Economics, 17(1): 65-73.

- Mehrabi Boshr Abadi H. & Mousavi Mohammadi H. (2009), Effects of supportive policies towards the agricultural sector on the food security of Iranian rural households, Quarterly journal of agricultural economy and development, 18(5): 117-130.

- Akbari Moqadam B. (2004), Economic liberalization in Iran, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of human sciences, Mazandaran University, 12(3): 141-152.

- Karami Najafi B. & Ismaeli A. (2010), Effects of reforms in food subsidy on production and the Iranian production agents: an application of CGE model, Journal of research in agricultural economy, 4(2): 77-97.

Javanbakht A. & Salami H. (2009), An investigation into agricultural subsidy income-based industries and macroeconomic parameters, Journal of economy and development in agriculture, 40(2): 1-15.

- Lin B. & Jiang Z. (2010), Estimates of energy Subsidies in china and impact of energy subsidy refor, Joumal of Energy Economics, 15(1): 29-37.

- Lafgaren H. & Rebeca Li H. & Sherman R. (2010), Computer programming standard CGE model in GAMS, Translated by Mahdi Shahraki and Simin Qaderi, Chabahar: Chabahar Maritime and Marine University Press, 17(4): 147-160.

- Bohringer C. & Loschel A. (2006), “Computable General Equilibrium Models for Sustainability Impact Assessment: Status Quo and Prospects”, Ecological Economics, 12(3): 86-99.

- Holden D. & Perman R. (1974), Unit roots and cointegration for the economist, Cointegration for the applied economist, 23(1): 224-229.

- Rouyani D. (2008), Reforms of agricultural subsidies and changing into direct payments in the framework of CGE model, Master's dissertation, Faculty of human sciences, Mazandaran University, 15(4): 51-62.

- Dekalo A. (1999), Characterizing Regional Economic Impacts and Responses to Climate Change, Global and Planetary Change, 25(6): 78-88.

- Beghin J. & Dessus S. & Ronald Holst D. & Mensbrugghe V. (2019), “Empirical Modeling of Trade and Environment”, Trade and Environment in General Equilibrium: Evidence from Developing Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 26(5): 90-101.

- Dessus S. & Bussolo M. (1998), “Is There a Trade-off between Trade Liberalization and Pollution abatement?”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(1): 26-35

- Faraj Zade Z. (2012), Effects of reforms in Iranian commercial policies and energy on people's welfare and environment, A PhD dissertation on agricultural economy, Faculty of agriculture, Shiraz University, 13(8): 58-66.