- Albeverio, S., Andrey, D., Giordano, P., & Vancheri, A. (2007). The dynamics of complex urban systems: An interdisciplinary approach: Springer.
- Alford, J., & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society.
- Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management learning, 42(4), 439-446.
- Ashtarian, K. and B. Khaleghipour (2021). "Designing a model of corporate cultural responsibility in urban policy making." Public Policy 6(3): 145-167.
- Ballard, G. (2006). Rethinking project definition in terms of target costing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction.
- Barrett, P., Hudson, J., & Stanley, C. (1999). Good practice in briefing: the limits of rationality. Automation in Construction, 8(6), 633-642.
- Bezner Kerr, R., Hickey, C., Lupafya, E., & Dakishoni, L. (2019). Repairing rifts or reproducing inequalities? Agroecology, food sovereignty, and gender justice in Malawi. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(7), 1499-1518.
- Bilello, J. (1995). Deciding to build: University organization and the design of academic buildings.
- Bouchlaghem, D. (2000). Better Construction Briefing. In: Wiley Online Library.
- Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.
- Buenaño, G. (2000). The becoming of problems in design: Knowledge in action to frame wicked problems.
- Calogero, P. (2009). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Fieldwork. Berkeley Planning Journal, 22(1).
- Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education, 79-103.
- Crowley, K., & Head, B. W. (2017). The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revisiting Rittel and Webber. Policy sciences, 50(4), 539-547.
- Daviter, F. (2017). Coping, taming or solving: alternative approaches to the governance of wicked problems. Policy studies, 38(6), 571-588.
- Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311-335.
- Edelenbos, J. (2005). Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance, 18(1), 111-134.
- Fazeli, M. (2017). "The concept of malignant issues." Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy 6(21): 11-12.
- Ferguson, R. F., & Dickens, W. T. (2011). Urban problems and community development: Brookings Institution Press.
- Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., McGivern, G., Dopson, S., & Bennett, C. (2011). Public policy networks and ‘wicked problems’: a nascent solution? Public Administration, 89(2), 307-324.
- Gero, J. S. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological forecasting and social change, 64(2-3), 183-196.
- Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public policy, 3(2), 101.
- Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711-739.
- Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337-358.
- Janis, I. L. (2008). Groupthink. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 36.
- Johns, (2009). Becoming a reflective practitioner: John Wiley & Sons.
- Jordan, A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and planning C: Government and policy, 26(1), 17-33.
- Kamara, J., Anumba, C., & Evbuomwan, N. (2000). Establishing and processing client requirements—a key aspect of concurrent engineering in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
- March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen: Simon and Schuster.
- Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990). Second generation instructional design (ID₂). Educational Technology, 30(2), 7-14.
- Moroni, S., Buitelaar, E., Sorel, N., & Cozzolino, S. (2020). Simple planning rules for complex urban problems: Toward legal certainty for spatial flexibility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 40(3), 320-331.
- Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385-396.
- Sarvar, R. (2018). "Explanation of good governance of good urban governance with emphasis on location smart growth; case study: city of Tehran." Urban Management 17(52): 189-204.
- Sarvar, R. (2019). "Pathology of Structure of Decision Making System in Urban Management Process: Case Study Tehran." Geography (Regional Planning) 10(1): 109-121.
- Termeer, C. J., Dewulf, A., & Biesbroek, R. (2019). A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice. In: Taylor & Francis.
- Termeer, C. J., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G., & Stiller, S. J. (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47(6), 680-710.
- Whyte, K. P., & Thompson, P. B. (2012). Ideas for how to take wicked problems seriously. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(4), 441-445.
|
