Investigating the Effect of Product Packaging Design on Attracting Customers about Cosmetic Products with Conjoint Analysis Method

Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering

مقاله 27، دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 32، شهریور 2022، صفحه 321-328   

نوع مقاله: Original Manuscript

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22094/joie.2021.1919461.1814

نویسندگان

Davood Jafari^* ؛ Nima Asadian؛ Loabat Parvizi

Department of Industrial Engineering, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran

چکیده

The present research is based on the design of packaging based on the golden ratio technique and its effect on attracting cosmetic and cosmetic products customers using conjoint analysis. The sample size of this study was 385 women over 18 years old in Tehran. Data were collected by interview and questionnaire. The results of this study showed that the golden ratio has a significant effect on the attractiveness of packaging and the increasing intention to buy customers, as well as the level of education people, have on the choice of packages that have a golden ratio in them is very effective. They have a direct relationship with each other. Also, features of geometric shape, color and writing language are influential in choosing the package and intention to buy customers.

کلیدواژه‌ها

packaging design؛ golden ratio؛ health care products؛ customer intent؛ conjoint analysis

مراجع

Abadi, M., Saeednia, H., & Khorshidi, A. (2021). Presenting a Model of Customer Experience Management in Mobile Banking Industry for Commercial Banks Customers in Dubai. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(2), 215-223.

Abedian, M., Amindoust, A., Madahi, R., & Jouzdani, J. (2021). Determining the best combination of perspective indicators of balanced scorecard by using game theory. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(1), 185-194.

Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of consumer marketing.

Arboretti, R., & Bordignon, P. (2016). Consumer preferences in food packaging: CUB models and conjoint analysis. British Food Journal.

Ares, G., Arrúa, A., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Machín, L., Martínez, J., & Giménez, A. (2016). Influence of label design on children’s perception of two snack foods: Comparison of rating and choice-based conjoint analysis. Food quality and preference, 53, 1-8.

Ares, G., Besio, M., Giménez, A., & Deliza, R. (2010). Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics. Appetite, 55(2), 298-304.

Ares, G., Deliza, R., Barreiro, C., Giménez, A., & Gámbaro, A. (2010). Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food quality and preference, 21(4), 417-426.

Ares, G., Deliza, R. (2010). Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food quality and preference, 21(8), 930-937.

Deliza, R., Macfie, H. A. L., & Hedderley, D. (2003). Use of computer‐generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 18(6), 465-486.

Lange, C., Issanchou, S., & Combris, P. (2000). Expected versus experienced quality: trade-off with price. Food quality and preference, 11(4), 289-297.

Luceri, B., Vergura, D. T., & Zerbini, C. (2020). The effect of packaging material on consumer evaluation and choice: A comparison between glass and tetra-pak in the olive oil sector. In Customer Satisfaction and Sustainability Initiatives in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 236-250). IGI Global.

McNeal, J. U., & Ji, M. F. (2003). Children’s visual memory of packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing.

Mgbemena, C. O., Chinwuko, E., & Ifowodo, H. F. (2020). Production Constraints Modelling: A Tactical Review Approach. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 13(1), 19-27.

Mmari, S., Safari, T. J., & Lwelamira, J. (2015). Consumers’ Perceptions on Packaging of Processed Food Products in Dodoma Municipality, Tanzania. Social Sciences, 4(4), p77-81.

Nørgaard Olesen, S., & Giacalone, D. (2018). The influence of packaging on consumers’ quality perception of carrots. Journal of Sensory Studies, 33(1), e12310.

Orquin, J. L., Bagger, M. P., Lahm, E. S., Grunert, K. G., & Scholderer, J. (2020). The visual ecology of product packaging and its effects on consumer attention. Journal of Business Research, 111, 187-195.

Pentus, K., Mehine, T., & Kuusik, A. (2014). Considering emotions in product package design through combining conjoint analysis with psycho physiological measurements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 280-290.

Rebollar.R, Lidon.I, Serrano.A, Martin.J, Fernandez.M, (2012), Influence of chewing gum packaging design on consumer expectation and willinges to buy.An analysis of functional, sensory and experience attributes, Food Quality and Preference 24, 162-170.

Rao, V. R. (2014). Applied conjoint analysis (p. 389). New York: Springer.

Riaz, S., Wasif, S., Nisar, F., Farwa, U., & Rashid, A. (2015). Impact of packaging designs of cosmetics on female consumer’s buying behavior. Academic Research International, 6(5), 130-142.

Silayoi P., Speece.M, (2007), The importance of packaging attributes: a conjoint analysis approach, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 No. pp. 1495-1517.

Tuorila, H. M., Meiselman, H. L., Cardello, A. V., & Lesher, L. L. (1998). Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food quality and Preference, 9(6), 421-430.

Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., & Spence, C. (2015). Evaluating the orientation of design elements in product packaging using an online orientation task. Food quality and preference, 46, 151-159.

Zarei, D., Vazifehdust, H., & Mirabi, V. (2019), Modeling the Effect of Packaging on Canned Goods Purchasing Decisions among Job Subcultures. Journal of System Management, 5(3), 81-90.