تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,995 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,547 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,397,650 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,420,117 |
Genetic Variation within and between Three Iranian Goat Populations Using Nine Microsatellite Markers | ||
Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science | ||
دوره 12، شماره 1، خرداد 2022، صفحه 119-127 اصل مقاله (443.52 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Articles | ||
نویسندگان | ||
P. Gholizadeh1؛ M.B. Montazer Torbati* 1؛ A. Javanmard* 2؛ S. Alijani Alijani2 | ||
1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran | ||
2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Genetic diversity is essential and mirrors for diversity pattern and population evolution. With this motivation, the aim here is to investigate genetic similarities of three indigenous goats of Iran: Azerbaijan (n=50), Sarbisheh (n=50), Busher (n=29) using 9 microsatellites markers. We extracted genomic DNA and then employed routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol for amplification of nine specific microsatellite markers. The experimental raw genotype was applied to generate summary of statistics for molecular diversity criteria. From the results, 8 microsatellites visualized satisfactory electrophoresis pattern and reasonable degree of polymorphism. The ILSTS004 (0.42) and BM415 (1.8) microsatellite markers indicated highest and lowest value for Shannon index. We obtain 57-67% range for observed heterozygosity value regarding to Azerbaijan and Sarbisheh goat, respectively. From these results it is clear the high genetic similarity was found between the Sarbisheh and Busher populations. Overall, bottleneck based evidence using IAM and SMM models demonstrated normal ‘L’-shaped distribution in investigated Azerbaijan and Sarbisheh goat. In conclusion, this analysis leads evidence for sufficient genetic variation within investigated goat. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
conservation؛ genetic diversity؛ indigenous goat؛ microsatellite markers | ||
اصل مقاله | ||
INTRODUCTION Iran is in particular geographical area with wealth biodiversity animal resource and claimed as center of domestication of animal genetic resources (Vahidi et al. 2014). Domestic goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) is storehouse of genetic materials claimed as the first small ruminants and assumed as undoubted strategic ancient livestock particularly, for rural families’ economy and with has large distribution in worldwide (Zheng et al. 2020) A summary of previous literatures demonstrated this species first time domesticated in high Zagros mountain and arid lowland plains of Iraq and Iran. The reported FAO statistics indicated that approximately 674 million goat exist globally and developing countries contributed almost 94% of this value for themselves (Miller and Lu, 2019). Iranian indigenous goats have been classified into 20 ecotype and Azerbaijan, Sarbisheh, Busher are three goats with limited genetic information in the country (Tavakolian, 2000). The spectrum of genetic diversity existing among livestock breed is assay for initiated and designing any conservation plan for maintain this criteria (Zhang et al. 2018). Various factors such as reproductive fragmentation, and anthropogenically factors, various breeding plans and physical isolation for a different period contributed for loss of diversity and increase of inbreeding and genetic bottleneck phenomena. Over the time horizon, indigenous specific livestock diversity always experienced loss of diversity forever and if conservation plan not exist then maintaining of this diversity may not be replaced even in future (Askari et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2018). Monitoring of genetic diversity indicators is pre-required to understand factors reduced chances of breed survival due to decreased fitness through inbreeding depression. Therefore, molecular genetics offers accurate tools to conserver and access to knowledge about current situation of animal genetic resources for sustainable agriculture (Kevorkian et al. 2010). Microsatellites markers are high polymorphic chromosomal regions with one to six base pairs long specific variable motif with CA common pattern in mammalian genome (Amos et al.1996; Goldstein and Schlotterer, 1999). Mutation rate in the genomic region of microsatellites is very high rate (Abdul-Muneer, 2014). These markers have several advantages such as relative ease of acquisition, high polymorphism, neutrality, and easy to sample preparation (Crowford et al. 1997). It also detects changes in simple nucleotide repetitions, random and abundant distribution in the genome and their alignment which used for several types of studies (Abdul-Muneer, 2014). The summary of previous reports have been listed specific identified microsatellites in different livestock and poultry genomes such as camelids, cattle, buffaloes, goats, sheep, horses and donkeys, chickens, and ducks (Abdelkader et al. 2017; Cherifi et al. 2017; Tefiel et al. 2018; Abdelkader et al. 2020; Rahal et al. 2020). In goat linkage map spans 2737 cM with 307 loci linkage map, there are 504 SSR markers assigned for 60 chromosomes (De-Gortari et al. 1998), and there is a list of suitable STR markers for genetic study recommend by FAO and genetic society for international comparison of obtained outputs (FAOSTAT, 2020). Therefore, the aim of the study of intra and inter-population genetic relationships three Iranian Azerbaijan, Sarbisheh, Busher indigenous goat population using microsatellite markers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals and sampling To perform this research, the sampling process from unrelated animals carried out in three provinces of Iran, namely Azerbaijan (n=50) in northwest and Busher (n=50) in southern region and Sarbisheh (n=29) in both sex goat from Birjand in south Khorasan. To ensure that sampled animals were not closely related, different herds were identified within the districts within each province. The Azerbaijan goat expressing different coat colors and predominant coat color is black with white spots. This breed indicated reasonable resistant to diseases and harsh weather conditions and mean mature body weight for buck and does is 60 and 52.5 kg in this breed. The Black Busher goat is raising for three system: rural, farm and nomadic. This breed expressing pure black color long coat fiber and highlights for good adaptation to environmental condition. Mean mature body weight for buck and does is 35 and 31 kg in this breed. The Sarbishe cashmere goat is a local dual-purpose breed (cashmere and meat) that is well-adapted to dry and semi dry ecological condition of south Khorasan, which can creates employment opportunities in the region and empower rural and nomadic people. Main geographical distribution of this breed is South Khorasan and Sarbisheh (kilometer of 70th of Birjand-Zahedan road), the main breeding center for this breed (Figure 1). In laboratory process, 10 mL of whole blood was collected from the jugular-vein from each animal by using syringes and needles and vacuum tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as an anticoagulant and instantly stored in 4 ˚C and then stored at -20 ˚C for future use. According to the FAO and the International Association of Animal Genetics (ISAG) (FAO, 2004), we selected 9 STR markers (Barker, 1994) with different chromosomal positions (Table 1).
Molecular analysis The genomic DNA was purified from blood according to the Samadi Shams conventional protocol (Samadi Shams et al. 2011). Gel monitoring and NanoDrop 2000/2000c spectrophotometer methods (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were used for quality and quantity measurement test. PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 15 μL containing master mix kit (Ampliqon, Denmark) 7.5 μL master mix 2X, 1 pmol of each primer (Forward and Reverse), and 4.9 μL ddH2O, and 1.5 μL of genomic DNA (all these steps were done on ice). Model of PCR Machin for amplification of fragment was Biometra company and the PCR program was used in the PCR machine to replicate the STR loci of the Touch-down PCR specific program was designed to simultaneously amplify the locus and minimize nonspecific and starter bands. The “touchdown” PCR protocol used with initial denaturation of 95 ˚C for 8 min, followed by the first stage of amplification of 12 cycles involving a denaturation step at 94 ˚C for 1min, annealing based on reducing the temperature from 68 ˚C to 52 ˚C for 40 sec, and extension at 72 ˚C for 30 sec, and finally, the final reproduction temperature was set at 72 ˚C for 8 min. The PCR products were determined on 6% agarose gels stained with metaphor in 1X TAE buffer. Allele sizes were estimated using the 11 lines (25-755-bp) ladder (Life science company).
Statistical analysis Individual genotypes are measured at each location or allele size using UVdoc 99.02 analysis software (UVI Tech, Cambridge, UK), then for preparation of input files for each specific package, CONVERT version 1.31 (Glaubitz, 2004), and CREAT version 1.1 packages (Coombs et al. 2008) were employed.
Figure 1 Overview of breed external appearance and main geographical distribution
Table 1 Characteristics of selected loci of SSR markers for this study
The molecular measurements indexes such as genotype and allele frequencies, the observed number of alleles (Na), effective number of alleles (Ne), observed (Ho), expected (He) heterozygosity’s, Shannon index (I), polymorphic information content (PIC), inbreeding coefficient (FIS), F-statistics (FIS, FIT and FST), genetic distance, allele admixture and population structure, clustering, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and bottleneck index were calculated. From used different software and the computational package include POPGENE version 1.31 (Yeh et al. 1999), ARLEQUIN version 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010), GenAlEx version 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012), STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al. 2000), BOTTLENECK version 1.2.02 (Piry et al. 1999).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Consideration of molecular genetic diversity criteria is important to understand level of genetic variability of DNA variability to ensure about breed survivability and natural response against harsh condition and environmental stressors such as and feed shortage, drought and heat and disease. Today, the wide diversity of livestock breeds and strains accessible is part of our cultural legacy and it merits protecttion. Wide applicability of SSR in different area of research indicated this marker able to work on genetic diversity, research on genetic bottleneck, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, parentage control, fraud identification and discovery of pedigree errors and sex determination and association study for fecundity and resistance to disease. The outcomes of this report have been divided into two parts. First part deals the assessment of suitability and polymorphism on selected SSR loci for this investigated goat breed and second part as main goal of research to determine genetic diversity in two level of intra and inter-population genetic relationships three Iranian Azerbaijan, Sarbisheh, Busher indigenous goat population using microsatellite markers
Characteristics of selected microsatellite loci From the results, all chosen microsatellites indicated satisfactory gel pattern in investigated goat population. Figure 2 shows the actual estimated amplified band per investigated loci through whole investigated population. As we can concludes range of allele size was variable approximately 100 bp 280 bp which is accordance to FAO recommended loci list and most pervious similar literatures (FAO, 2011). For suitability of chosen microsatellites, loci have to indicated high number of observed allele, observed hetrozygosity and PIC index as well as Shannon index, in this regards, outcomes of our analysis showed: The highest and lowest Shannon index was ranged ILSTS004 (0.42) and BM415 (1.8). Also, the highest and lowest observed hetrozygosity was ranged CSSM32 (0.92) and CSSM004 (0.10). Furthermore, the highest and lowest observed hetrozygosity was ranged CSSM32 (0.92) and CSSM004 (0.10). As interpretation of outcome is this part, heterozygosity index of loci an appropriate indirectly tells about combination of observed alleles within each loci and as SSR express high number of alleles per loci therefore this heterozygosity highly depend on sample size and number of SSR loci. Our results in this area show in accordance and accordance of some similar reports with this logical justification. Our results showed that the mean of observed and expected heterozygosity in Sarbisheh, Azerbaijan, Busher and total were 0.75 and 0.69, 0.57 and 0.61, 0.69 and 0.64 and 0.67 and 0.66, respectively. The mean of observed and effective number of alleles were obtained 4.88 and 3.84, 6.88 and 3.16, 5.44 and 3.27 and 8.55 and 3.76 for Sarbisheh, Azerbaijan, Busher and total respectively. The results observed hertozygosity in this research was lowest than for four Tunisian sheep breeds with 30 STR markers (Kdidi et al. 2015), in three local sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia, using 17 STR markers (Mahmoud et al. 2017) and in four Romania native sheep breeds with 18 STR markers (Dudu et al. 2020). These results of present study for Shandon index index was highest then (Greguła-Kania et al. 2015) in Poland, while lowest than (Jyotsana et al. 2010) in India, (Musthafa et al. 2012) in Saudi Arabia and (Hussain et al. 2019) in Pakistan. In addition, in present study, the range in values for He and observed Ho was higher than similar previously published data (Kusza et al. 2010) in Bulgaria, (Ocampo et al. 2016) in Colombia and (Dossybayev et al. 2019) in Kazakhstan. Moreover, PIC is a parameter indicative of the degree of informativeness of a marker. The PIC value may range from zero to one. Therefore, loci with many alleles and a PIC value of one are most desirable.
Figure 2 Summary of various parameters measures estimated for each locus in Iranian whole investigated breeds
The result of PIC in present study was in same line with China local sheep breeds (Zenga et al. 2010), sheep breeds in South Africa (Qwabe, 2011), and (Greguła-Kania et al. 2015) in Poland, and lower from Jordanian (Jawasreh et al. 2018) and Iranian (Ebrahimi et al. 2017) sheep breeds. Some factors, such as mutations and selection, affect the amount of polymorphism in STR loci. Figure 3 and 4 summarizes various parameters measures estimated for each locus in Iranian whole investigated breeds. Following the criteria of Botstein et al. (1980), the investigated markers in indigenous sheep breeds of India were observed to be highly informative (PIC>0.5), reasonably informative (0.25<PIC<0.5) and slightly informative, less than 0.25 (Jyotsana et al. 2010). Hence, the degree of informativeness of a marker reveals its usefulness in diversity analysis of a breed. A higher value of PIC means more alleles and greater polymorphism at that locus.
Inter-population genetic relationships of studied breeds To the best of our knowledge, deficiency of knowledge is existed about the genetic relationship for these three indigenous and locally developed goat breeds using microsatellite markers. Considering Ho, He and F-statistics parameters within and between investigated population can show situation of genetic structure of each specific breed in response to reproductive mating system, natural and artificial selection, immigration and fragmentation evens and genetic bottleneck. F-statistics parameter able to measure the population differentiation or variation within and between populations. The result of present study showed Azerbaijan and Sarbisheh has negative FIS value (reasonable inbreeding) in compare of Sarbisheh goat (experiencing inbreeding). FIS index the deficiency of heterozygosity in an individual due to non-random mating within population and this parameter ranged from -1 to +1, but in nature it is always nearer to zero. If Fis value become 1 means closer relationship among the individuals.
Figure 3 Summary of various parameters measures estimated for each locus in Iranian whole investigated breeds
Figure 4 Summary of polymorphic information content (PIC) parameters per investigated loci in each studied goat breed
Moreover, FST parameters is the deficiency in heterozygosity due to subdivision in the population and value of this index many ranged from 0 to 1 and is classified into low (<0.15), moderate (0.15 to 0.25) and high (>0.25) genetic differentiation and The lower and high FST values indicate higher relationship and inbreeding versus out breeding between the populations respectively. Figure 5 illustrated some statistical molecular genetics parameters per investigated goat population. Positive values of FIS indicate loss of heterozygosity in some STR markers, similar to the results reported by (Hristova et al. 2014), (Vahidi et al. 2016), and (Karsli et al. 2020). The positive FIS value suggested inbreeding to be one of the main causes of lack of heterozygotes in Iranian sheep. Low heterozygotes and excess of homozygotes within the studied populations may be related to several factors such as the mating system of animals, number of samples, selection (genetic hitchhiking), and null alleles (Nei, 1987). The cluster graph resulted of Nei’s genetic distance and genetic identity (Nei, 1987) and the phylogenetic relationship between breeds made by the neighbor-joining tree is shown by the genetic distance matrix. As you can concluded here the greatest genetic similarity cluster was observed between the Sarbisheh and Busher populations. Figure 6 illustrated graphical cluster between breeds made by the neighbor-joining based on Nei distance and genetic identity. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) provided an estimate of the measure of population genetic differentiation within and among populations. The AMOVA showed that 97 percent of the genetic variation among three investigated breeds is attributed to among populations compared with 3 percent due to variation within and between individuals (Figure 7).
Figure 5 Summary of molecular parameters per population in this study
Figure 6 Phylogenetic relationship between breeds made by the neighbor-joining based on Nei distance and genetic identity
Figure 7 Results of MANOVA extracted from Arlequin and GenAlEx software
On the basis of bottleneck outcome, interpretation of IAM and SMM models demonstrated normal ‘L’-shaped distribution of the mode-shift analysis test and the lack of bottleneck in the studied Azerbaijan and Sarbisheh goat populations (Table 8). Giving more explanation for this calculation, bottleneck analysis try to evaluate population decline in response to factors affecting genetic diversity of breed structure based on mode shift test, under the assumption of the two-phase model. The occurrence of a normal L-shaped curve revealed no loss of alleles in the investigated populations and hence the absence of a genetic bottleneck. The Mode-shift indicator test was also utilized to detect potential bottlenecks, as the non-bottleneck populations that are near mutation-drift equilibrium are expected to have a large proportion of alleles with low frequency. This test discriminates many bottlenecked populations from stable populations. A graphical representation utilizing allelic class and proportion of alleles showed a normal ‘L’shaped distribution. The L shaped curve indicated the abundance of low frequency alleles. This finding suggested the absence of any detectably large, recent genetic bottleneck (last 40-80 generations) in declining population, where the probability of low frequency allele's loss was very high. Similar pattern of detections were also reported by earlier research workers (Manjari et al. 2018; Mohankishore et al. 2019). The population structure was computed using Structure (Pritchard et al. 2000). In structure analysis, the Ln Pr (X׀K) increased clearly from K= 1 to K= 4 and reached a plateau at K= 3, and therefore K= 3 was taken as the most likely number of inferred populations. This is also highlighted that Busher, Azari, and Sharbisheh were well-differentiated. The result of the clusters revealed the presence of admixtures which are indicative of gene flow between these breeds. As final conclusion, we can suggest here that there is sufficient genetic variation within investigated indigenous goat breed and Azerbaijan and Sarbisheh goat can assume as really different breeds. These results will help future researchers as a key guide to better understanding the genetic relationships and breed differences in Iranian sheep breeds for making future breed policies and programs to protect any breed of goat in the country.
Figure 8 Results of bottleneck analysis in three investigated breed L-shape pattern means lack of loss diversity in the studied breed
Figure 9 Results of PCOA and Bayesian clustering based on MCMC and model test in the studied breed
CONCLUSION This present study demonstrated genetic similarity with and between individuals in four Iranian goat breeds and in summary statistical output indicated the ability of STR for estimation of genetic diversity in goat. Finally, further investigation for genetic variability of the genome in goat is needed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We would like to express our sincere gratitude to environmental protection organization for providing an opportunity for work in their Gene bank laboratory and Dr. Ghasemi and Gomi and Dr. Javad Ghahari for their insightful and constructive collaboration during processing molecular works. Financial support of Birjand university also appreciated for providing budget of this research. | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdelkader A.A., Ata N., Benyoucef M.T., Djaout A., Azzi N., Yilmaz O., Cemal I. and Gaouar S.B.S. (2017). New genetic identification and characterisation of 12 Algerian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 17, 38-48.
Abdelkader A.A., Yilmaz O., Ata N., Cemal I. and Gaouar S.B.S. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity of Turkish and Algerian native sheep breeds. Acta Agric. Slovenica. 115, 5-14.
Abdul-Muneer P.M. (2014). Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: Recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies-review article. Genet. Res. Int. 2014, 691759-691765.
Amos W., Saweer S.J., Feakes R.W. and Rubinsztein D.C. (1996). Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat. Genet. 43, 390-391.
Askari N., Mohammadabadi M.R. and Baghizadeh A. (2011). ISSR markers for assessing DNA polymorphism and genetic characterization of cattle, goat and sheep populations. Iranian J. Biotechnol. 9, 222-229.
Barker J.S.F. (1994). A global protocol for determining genetic distances among domestic Livestock breeds. Pp. 501-508 in Proc. 5th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M. and Davis W. (1980). Construction of genetic linkage maps in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Human Genet. 32, 314-331.
Cherifi Y.A., Gaouar S.B.S., Guastamacchia R., El-Bahrawy K.A., Abushady A.M.A., Sharaf A.A., Harek D., Lacalandra G.M., Saidi-Mehtar N. and Ciani E. (2017). Weak genetic structure in northern African dromedary camels reflects their unique evolutionary history. PloS One. 1, e0168672.
Coombs J.A., Letcher B.H. and Nislow K.H. (2008). CREATE: A software to create input files from diploid genotypic data for 52 genetic software programs. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 578-580.
Crowford A.M., Kappes S.M., Paterson K.A., de Gotari M.J., Dodds K.G., Freking B.A., Stone R.T. and Beattie C.W. (1997). Microsatellite evolution: testing the ascertainment bias hypothesis. J. Mol. Evol. 46, 256-260.
De-Gortari M.J., Freking B.A., Cuthbertson R.P., Kappes S.M., Keele J.W., Stone R.T., Kreg A., Leymaster K.R., Dodds G.K., Allan M., Crawford A.M. and Beattie C.W. (1998). A second-generation linkage map of the sheep genome. Mamm. Genome. 9, 204-209.
Dossybayev K., Orazymbetova Z., Mussayeva A., Saitou N., Zhapbasov R., Makhatov B. and Bekmanov B. (2019). Genetic diversity of different breeds of Kazakh sheep using microsatellite analysis. Arch. Anim. Breed. 62, 305-311.
Dudu A., Popa G.O., Ghita E., Pelmus R., Lazar C., Costache M. and Georgescu S.E. (2020). Assessment of genetic diversity in main local sheep breeds from Romania using microsatellite markers. Arch. Anim. Breed. 63, 53-58.
Ebrahimi M., Taghi V., Mohammadreza M. and Ali E. (2017). Using microsatellite markers to analyze genetic diversity in 14 sheep types in Iran. Arch. Anim. Breed. 3,183.
Excoffier L. and Lischer H. (2010). ARLEQUIN suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 10, 564-567.
FAO. (2004). Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans. Measurement of Domestic Animal Diversity (MoDAD): Recommended Microsatellite Markers Initiative for Domestic Animal Diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
FAO. (2011). Guidelines for the Molecular Genetic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
FAOSTAT. (2020). Database of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Glaubitz J.C. (2004). Convert: A user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 4, 309-310.
Goldstein D.B. and Schlotterer C. (1999). Microsatellites; Evolution and Application. Oxford University Press. Oxford, United Kingdom.
Greguła-Kania M., Karpinski M., Gruszecki M.T., Milewski S., Drozd L., Patkowski K., Czyżowski P., Goleman M., Tajchman K., Kondracki M., Wiercińska K. and Szymanowska A. (2015). Analysis of genetic diversity in newly created sheep populations and their maternal breeds. Sci. Ann. Polish Anim. Prod. 4, 21-29.
Hristova D., Todorovska E., Vassilev D., Metodiev S., Popov I., Yablanski T. and Zhelyazkov E. (2014). Microsatellites based genetic diversity and population structure of seven Bulgarian indigenous sheep breeds. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 3, 569-581.
Hussain T., Musthafa M.M., Babar M., Shaheen M. and Marikar F. (2019). Molecular genetic diversity and relationship of indigenous sheep breeds of Pakistan based on nuclear microsatellite loci. Rev. Vet. 30, 54-58.
Jawasreh K.I., Mustafa I., Zuhair M.A., Abdel B.I. and Al Sukhni I. (2018). Genetic diversity and population structure of local and exotic sheep breeds in Jordan using microsatellites markers. Vet. World. 11, 2231-0916.
Jyotsana B., Jakhesaraa S., Prakashb V., Ranka D.N. and Vataliyac P.H. (2010). Genetic features of Patanwadi, Marwari and Dumba sheep breeds (India) inferred by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin. Res. 93, 57-60.
Karsli B.A., Demir E., Fidan H.G. and Karsli T. (2020). Assessment of genetic diversity and differentiation among four indigenous Turkish sheep breeds using microsatellites. Arch. Anim. Breed. 63, 165-172.
Kdidi S., Calvo J.H., Gonzalez-Calvo L., Sassi M.B., Khorchani T. and Yahyaoui M.H. (2015). Genetic relationship and admixture in four Tunisian sheep breeds revealed by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin. Res. 131, 64-69.
Kevorkian S.E.M., Georgescu S.E., Manea M.A., Zaulet M., Hermenean A.O. and Costache M. (2010). Genetic diversity using microsatellite markers in four Romanian autochthonous sheep breeds. Romanian Biotechnol. Lett. 15, 5059-5065.
Kusza S., Dimov D., Nagy I., Bosze Z., Javor A. and Kukovics S. (2010). Microsatellite analysis to estimate genetic relationships among five Bulgarian sheep breeds. Genet. Mol. Biol. 33, 51-56.
Mahmoud A.H., Farah M.A., Alanazi K., Rady A., Salah M., Amor N. and Mohammed O. (2017). Genetic diversity among Sawakni, Berberi and Najdi sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia using microsatellites markers. African J. Biotechnol. 16, 171-178.
Manjari J.S., Kumari B.P., Ekambaram B., Reddy Y.R. and Amol T. (2018). Studies on genetic Variability in Nellore brown sheep using microsatellite Markers. Int. J. Livest. Res. 11, 149-157.
Miller B.A. and Lu C.D. (2019). Current status of global dairy goat production: An overview. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 32(8), 1219-1232.
Mohankishore M., Punyakumari B., Suresh J., Bharathi G. and Amol J.T. (2019). Genetic diversity analysis of Macherla Brown Sheep using microsatellite markers. Int. J. Livest. Res. 9, 84-93.
Musthafa M.M., Aljummah R.S. and Alshaik M.A. (2012). Genetic diversity of Najdi sheep based on microsatellite analysis. African J. Biotechnol. 11, 14868-14876.
Nei M. (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
Ocampo R., Cardona H. and Martinez R. (2016). Genetic diversity of Colombian sheep by microsatellite markers. Chilian J. Agric. Res. 76, 40-47.
Peakall R. and Smouse P.E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 28, 2537-2539.
Piry S., Luikart G. and Cornuet J.M. (1999). Bottleneck: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J. Heridity. 90, 502-503.
Pritchard J.K., Stephens M. and Donnelly P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155, 945-959.
Qwabe S.O. (2011). Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the South African Namaqua Afrikaner sheep breed. MS Thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Africa.
Rahal O., Aissaoui C., Ata N., Yilmaz O., Cemal I., Ameur Ameur A. and Gaouar S.B.S. (2020). Genetic characterization of four Algerian cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Anim. Biotechnol. 4, 1-9.
Samadi Shams S., Zununi Vahed S., Soltanzad F., Kafil V., Barzegari A., Atashpaz S. and Barar J. (2011). Highly effective DNA extraction method from fresh, frozen, dried and clotted blood samples. BioImpacts. 3, 183-187.
Tavakolian J. (2000). An Introduction to Genetic Resources of Native Farm Animals in Iran. Animal Science Genetic Research Institute Press. Tehran, Iran.
Tefiel H., Ata N., Chahbar M., Benyarou M., Fantazi K., Yilmaz O., Cemal I., Karaca O., Boudouma D. and Gaouar S.B.S. (2018). Genetic characterization of four Algerian goat breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin. Res. 160, 65-71.
Vahidi S.M.F., Faruque M.O., Kalahari A., Afraz F., Mousavi S.M., Boettcher P., Joost S., Han J.L., Colli L., Periasamy K., Negrini R. and Ajmone-Marsan P. (2016). Multilocus genotypic data reveal high genetic diversity and low population genetic structure of Iranian indigenous sheep. Anim. Genet. 4, 463-470.
Vahidi S.M.F., Tarang A.R., Naqvi A.N., Falahati Anbaran M., Boettcher P., Joost S., Colli L., Garcia J.F., Ajmone-Marsan P. (2014). Investigation of the genetic diversity of domestic Capra hircus breeds reared within an early goat domestication area in Iran. Genet. Sel. Evol. 46(27), 20-27.
Yeh F.C., Yang R. and Boyle T. (1999). POPGENE. Microsoft Windows Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. Release 1.31. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Zenga X.C., Chen H.Y., Hui W.Q., Jia B., Du Y.C. and Tian Y.Z. (2010). Genetic diversity measures of 8 local sheep breeds in northwest of china for genetic resource conservation. Asian- Australasian J. Anim. 23, 1552-1556.
Zhang M., Peng W.F., Hu X.J., Zhao Y.X. and Yang J. (2018). Global genomic diversity and conservation priorities for domestic animals are associated with the economies of their regions of origin. Sci. Rep. 8, 11677-11684.
Zheng Z., Wang X., Li M., Li Y., Yang Z., Wang X., Pan X., Gong M., Zhang Y., Guo Y., Wang Y., Liu J., Cai Y., Chen Q., Okpeku M., Colli L., Cai D., Wang K., Huang S., Sonstegard T.S., Ali Esmailizadeh A., Zheng W., Zheng T., Xu Y., Xu N., Yang Y., Han J., Chen L., Lesur J., Daly K.G., Bradley D.G., Heller R., Zheng G., Wang W., Chen Y. and Jiang Y. (2020). The origin of domestication genes in goats. Sci. Adv. 6(21), 1-13. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 449 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 465 |