Cognitive Styles and Sub-Skills: A Study on the Relationship between Reflectivity/ Impulsivity Dimension and Vocabulary/ Grammar Development among EFL Learners

Curriculum Research

مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 6، دی 2021، صفحه 1-10   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

نویسندگان

Azar Bagheri Masoudzade¹؛ Neda Fatehi Rad^{* 2}

¹PhD. in TEFL, Department of English Language, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran

²Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

چکیده

Purpose: This study endeavored to find out the possible relationship between reflectivity and impulsivity as cognitive learning styles and vocabulary/ grammar development as sub-skills among EFL learners. 
Methodology: Two intact classes of the third-grade students were selected by the researchers and Oxford Placement Test was run for homogenizing them. After that, Barrat’s (2005) Impulsive/ Reflective questionnaire was given to the participants and they had to respond the translated items in a limited time. Regarding the score scale provided by the questionnaire, the participants were labeled as reflective and impulsive ones. Next, a standard grammar/vocabulary test, extracted from their book, administered to them and the scores were recorded by the researchers. Then, the scores of the questionnaires and tests sent to SPSS software for analyzing and interpreting the data. In inferential statistics, the researchers used correlation test to examine the possible relationship between the students' learning styles and their sub-skills development. 
Findings: Results of the study indicated a positive relationship between the students' sub-skills achievements (vocabulary/ grammar) and their learning styles (reflectivity/ impulsivity). In other words, reflectivity and impulsivity had effect on the students' performance in sub-skills, as the reflective students presented better performance and made fewer errors than the impulsive ones in vocabulary and grammar tests. 
Conclusion: According to the results, it can be concluded that the higher the reflectivity of the learners is, the more successful they tend to be in such tests. It is expected that the findings of the research indicate the importance of learning styles in educational environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Cognitive Style؛ Reflectivity؛ Impulsivity؛ Vocabulary؛ Grammar

مراجع

Abraham, R, (2000). The relationship of cognitive style to the use of grammatical rules by Spanish-speaking ESL students in editing written English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Champaign-Urbana, University of Illinois.
Barratt, E. S. (2005). Impulsiveness and aggression. In J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment (pp. 61–79). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th edition). New York: Pearson Longman.
Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd. Ed.). White Plains, New York: Pearson Education
Damra, H. M. (2012). The effect of using language on grammar achievement and attitudes toward learning of basic stages EFL students. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 3 No. 1; January 2012.
Dixon, C.N., & Nessel, D. (2003). Language experience approach to reading and writing: Language experience for second language learners. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
Doron, S. (2003). Reflectivity-impulsivity and their influence on reading for inference for adult students of ESL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
Felder, R. (2018). Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28, No. 1,1995, pp. 21–31.
Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: varking up the right tree!, Educational Developments. SEDA Ltd, 7 (4), Nov, 4-7.
Ghanizadeh, A., Boori, A., & Toussi, M. (2011). The Role of EFL students’ Learning Styles in Effective Teaching. World Journal of Education. Vol. 1, No. 2; October 2011.
Ghapanchi, Z., & Dashti, Z (2011). The relationship between cognitive style of impulsivity and display, referential, and inferential reading comprehension questions among Iranian EFL University students. Canadian Social Science, 7 (6), 227-233.
Gültekin, İ. & Karababa, Z.C. (2010). The Relation between the autonomy level and the learning styles of English language learners. Ankara University Turkey. EABR & ETLC Conference Proceedings Dublin, Ireland.
Haghighi, M., Ghanavati, M., & Rahimi, A. (2015). The Role of Gender Differences in the Cognitive Style of Impulsivity/Reflectivity and EFL Success. Social and Behavioral Sciences 19 (2), Pp. 467 – 474.
Hajimohammadi, R., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Impact of self-correction on extrovert and introvert students in EFL writing progress. English Language Teaching, 4 (2), 161.
Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29 (4), 597-618.
Hansen-Strain, L. (2007). Cognitive Style & First Language Background in Second Language Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 265-268.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jamieson, J. (2001). The Cognitive Style of Reflection/ Impulsivity & Field Independence & ESL Success. Modern Language Journal, 76, 491-501.
Kagan, J. (2001). Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 37,583-594.
Kagan, J. (2005). Reflection – Impulsivity: The Generality and Dynamics of conceptual Tempo. Journal of Abnormal psychology, 71, 359 - 64.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212.
Larsari, M. (2013). Reflection-Impulsivity and Reading Ability. Research on theories of cognitive styles. Time Education, 5, 130-131 
Mackey. A., & Gass, S. (2013). Second Language Research Methodology and Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Mahwah, New Jersey. London.
Mahdavinia, M., & Molavizadeh, M (2013). On the Relationship between Impulsivity/Reflectivity Cognitive Style and the Use of Idioms in Composition Writing Among Iranian Advanced EFL Learners. International Electronic Journal for the Teachers of English, 3 (1), pp. 49-61.
Messer, S.B. (2006). Reflection-impulsivity: a review. Psychological Bulletin. 83, 1026-1052.
Morovat, E. (2014). Effects of Reflectivity/Impulsivity on IELTS Candidates’ Band Scores in the Speaking Module of the Test. Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 (8), Pp.1232 – 1239.
Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., & Sheese, R. (2008). Cognitive development: Neo-Piagetian perspectives. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Shagholi, R., & Abuzaid, R. A. (2010). Did you cook your lesson based on right recipe? (Accommodating the Students Preferences in Class) Social Behavioral Sciences, 2, 383-387.
Nematpour, H. (2012). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 209.
Nisa, N. A. (2018). The Comparative Study between Reflectivity and Impulsivity Cognitive Style in Using Learning Strategy in Reading Comprehension on Second Graders.  The language and art department of the faculty of Teacher Training and Education.
Pazouki, M. and Rastegar, M. (2009). Investigating the relationship between Learning styles and EFL Proficiency. Psychological Research, (11 & 2).
Pirouznia, M. (2004). The Impact of Impulsivity – Reflectivity on EFL Reading Comprehension: MA thesis. Tehran University.
Rastegar, B., & Safari, F. (2017). Output-Based Instruction, Learning Styles and Vocabulary Learning in the EFL Context of Iran. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 101-111.
Rastegar, B., & Safari, F. (2017). Output-Based Instruction, Learning Styles and Vocabulary Learning in the EFL Context of Iran. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5 (2), 101-111.
Razmjoo, S. A., & Mirzaei, R. (2009). On the relationship between dimensions of reflectivity/ impulsivity as cognitive styles, language proficiency and, GPAsamong the Iranian EFLuniversity learners. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3(1), 105-124.
Reid, J. M. (2005). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Salimi, E. (2001). On the relationship between impulsivity-reflectivity cognitive style and performance in TMU English proficiency test. Unpublished Master dissertation. TMU Iran, Iran.
Shabani, S., Ramazani, M., & Alipoor, I. (2017). The Effect of Impulsivity vs. Reflectivity on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies ISSN: 2202-9478.
Smith, R. & J. Renzulli (2004). Learning Style Preference: A Practical Approach for Classroom Teachers. Theory to Practice, 23(2): 45-50.
Soltani, K., Hadidi, N., & Seifoori, Z. (2016). Iranian EFL Learners' Reflectivity/Impulsivity Styles and their Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Use across Gender. Scientific-research journal of education and evaluation, 8 (31), Pp. 103-124.
Talebi, M. (2012). The relationship between upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners' reflectivity style and use of formulaic expressions in news summary writing. MA thesis, Azad University of Tabriz: Tabriz.
Wang, T. I., Wang, K. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2008). Using a style-based ant colony system for adaptive learning. Expert Systems with applications, 34(4), 2449-2464.
Xu, W. (2011). Learning styles and their implications in learning and teaching. Theory and Practice in language Studies, 1(4), 413-416.