تعداد نشریات | 418 |
تعداد شمارهها | 9,997 |
تعداد مقالات | 83,557 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 77,674,982 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 54,727,982 |
The Effects of X-Ray Irradiation on Bovine Sperm Quality Indicators After Freezing and Thawing | ||
Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science | ||
دوره 12، شماره 4، اسفند 2022، صفحه 677-683 اصل مقاله (247.98 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Articles | ||
نویسندگان | ||
P. Shawrang* ؛ F. Abbasi | ||
Nuclear Agriculture Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Karaj, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This study was conducted to determine the suitable dose of x-ray irradiation on bovine sperm quality indicators after freezing and thawing. Sperm samples in liquid nitrogen were x-ray irradiated at doses of zero, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 Gy. The results showed that irradiation influenced (P<0.05) motility and viability of sperms. The semen malondialdehyde concentration had no significant differences among treatments. Based on the comet assay result, DNA strand breaks parameters had no significant differences with the control group, except at a dose of 1.2 Gy. Based on flow cytometry results, sperm percentage with high activity of mitochondrial membrane was increased and those with low activity decreased (P<0.05). The HOST test showed that sperm percentage with plasma membrane integrity in irradiated samples at a dose of 0.3 Gy had no significant difference compared to the control group, but sperm percentage with intact plasma membrane was higher in the sample irradiated at doses of 0.6 and 0.9 Gy. Irradiation at a dose of 0.9 Gy increased sperm with the intact plasma membrane. Doses lower than 1.2 Gy did not affect acrosome integrity, but 1.2 Gy x-ray irradiation decreased sperm having intact acrosome (P<0.05). Based on these results, x-ray irradiation at a dose of 0.9 Gy could increase the mitochondrial membrane activity and enhance the motility and viability of sperms after thawing without a negative effect on semen and sperm quality while x-ray irradiation at a dose of 1.2 or more Gy deteriorates semen quality. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
DNA strand breaks؛ mitochondrial membrane activity؛ motility؛ viability؛ x-ray irradiation | ||
اصل مقاله | ||
INTRODUCTION Long-term storage of sperm by freezing causes sperm motility and viability damage after thawing (Holt, 2000). Although compounds such as glycerol, and some amino acids (glutamine, glycine, proline, alanine, and histidine) are used to induce sperm resistance at low temperatures and to protect against cold shock, a 25% decrease in motility of bovine sperm after freezing is still observed (Amirat-Briand et al. 2009). X-ray as ionizing radiation can cause changes in the quality of the sperm by creating free radicals (Shawrang and Sadeghi, 2013). Some reports on the impact of irradiation on sperm quality in laboratory animals (mouse, rat, and hamster) were published (Tateno et al. 1996). Researchers exposed laboratory animals to ionizing beams including gamma-ray and x-ray and studied its effects on the sperm chromosome of two different hamster breeds (Chinese and Golden). These authors stated that there was no great difference in the induction of structural chromosome aberrations between X-irradiated (0.91, 1.82, 3.63) and y-irradiated (1.10, 2.15, 2.95, 4.01) spermatozoa (Tateno et al. 1996). Lubart et al. (1997) studied the effects of laser irradiation on mitochondrial activity and the plasma membrane of mammalian sperm. These authors reported that 780 nm light inhibits Ca2+ uptake by sperm mitochondria and enhances Ca2+ binding to sperm plasma membranes. Parplys et al. (2012) studied the effects of x-rays on DNA damage. These authors reported that ionizing irradiation induces several types of DNA lesions, base damage, single-strand breaks, and double-strand breaks through the production of free radicals. Although there are different ways to evaluate the rate of DNA breaks, the Comet method has advantages over other methods. Among the benefits of this method is that it is possible to investigate damage to single cells, being able to detect minimal DNA damage (Olive and Banath, 2006). This method estimates DNA damage parameters including % DNA in tail and tail moment. Comet observations include the head + the tail (Frenzilli et al. 2014). Irradiation with laser red light has been described to improve the cryotolerance and longevity of frozen-thawed bovine and ram spermatozoa (Fernandes et al. 2015; Iaffaldano et al. 2016). Red-light stimulation, either with low-level lasers or light-emitting diodes (LED), has also been reported to increase the motility, ability to elicit in vitro capacitation, fertilizing ability, and lifespan of fresh and liquid-stored semen in fish (Zan-Bar et al. 2005), turkey (Iaffaldano et al. 2005), dogs (Corral-Baqués et al. 2005; Corral-Baqués et al. 2009), rabbit (Iaffaldano et al. 2010), buffalos (Abdel-Salam et al. 2011) humans (Salama and El-Sawy, 2015), boar (Yeste et al. 2016; Pezo et al. 2019; Prieto et al. 2019) and donkeys (Catalán et al. 2020). Similarly, Shawrang et al. (2020) studied the application of gamma irradiation to increase the motility and viability of bovine sperm after freezing and thawing. The results of that study demonstrated that gamma irradiation at a dose of 0.7 Gy could enhance the motility and viability of sperms after thawing without a negative effect on semen and sperm quality. The aim of this study was the determination of the suitable dose of x-ray irradiation for increasing sperm motility and viability after freezing and thawing and to assess its effects on malondialdehyde concentration, the rate of sperm DNA strand breaks and mitochondrial membrane activity, acrosome and plasma membrane integrity of bovine sperm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Sperm preparation and irradiation 25 sperm straws 0.5 mL containing frozen sperm samples were prepared at -196 ˚C liquid nitrogen from NDJ Company. Frozen sperm samples were x-ray irradiated by Nuclear Regulatory Authority. According to studies, irradiation at a dose of 1 Gy will cause DNA damage (Tateno et al. 1996); Therefore sperm samples in liquid nitrogen were x-ray irradiated in 5 replicates at doses of zero, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 Gy using Balteau 235 Portable x-ray Generator (kV=120, mA=2.4) for 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 minute respectively.
Sperm motility and concentration Thawing of irradiated frozen sperm straws was done in 37 ˚C bain-marie for 45 seconds. The sperm quality and quantity parameters including concentration, motility, progressive motility, circle motility, fast motility, slow motility, local motility, and immotile sperm percentage were evaluated using the CASA system (12500/0000 AndroVision® Modul Concentration and Motility).
Sperm viability Sperm viability analysis was performed using eosin/nigrosin staining. The staining was assessed on a microscope slide, with 20 µL of frozen-thawed sample to 100 µL of staining solution. A smear was made and allowed to dry on another slide. Unstained spermatozoa and spermatozoa with the damaged membrane (200 sperm) were counted under the microscope at 100X (Mohammadi et al. 2011).
Sperm morphology Sperm morphology was performed using eosin/nigrosin staining, smears were made on slides, air-dried, and made permanent to calculate the abnormalities in spermatozoa. The slides were observed under the microscope using 100X and oil immersion objectives. Morphologically normal and abnormal spermatozoa were counted, and their percentage was calculated.
Determination the amount of malondialdehyde Malondialdehyde has been identified as the product of lipid peroxidation that reacts with thiobarbituric acid to give a pink species absorbing at 535 nm) Zeb and Ullah, 2016). Solutions used in this method included: 0.67% solution of thiobarbituric acid (TBA), 10% solution of trichloroacetic acid (TCA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT, 0.2 g of BHT in 10 mL of ethanol), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 0.37 g of EDTA in 10 mL of distilled water). Briefly, samples (0.5 mL of each sample) were homogenized with 0.5 mL EDTA, 0.5 mL BHT, and 1 mL TCA. The mixture was centrifuged at 936 × g for 15 min using a centrifuge (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Then, 2 mL of TBA was added to 1 ml of supernatant. The mixture was heated in boiling water (95 ˚C) for 1 h, followed by cooling with running water. Absorbance was read at 532 nm using a spectrophotometer. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were calculated from the standard curve and expressed as nmol malondialdehyde (MDA)/mL of semen.
Detection of DNA damage by sperm comet assay The assay was performed according to Frenzilli et al. (2014) with some modifications. The sperm sample was centrifuged and diluted with 500 µL PBS [8 g NaCl, 2 g KCl, 1.44g Na2HPO4, 0.24g KH2PO4 (pH 7.5)] after removal of the supernatant. Then, 30 μL of the sample was suspended in 150 µL of 0.7% (w/v) low melting point agarose (LMPA). From this suspension, 65 µL was applied to the surface of a microscope slide pre-coated with 0.8% normal melting point agarose (NMPA) to form a microgel and allowed to set at 4 ˚C for 10 min. Slides were dipped in cell lysis buffer [146.19 g NaCl, 37.24 g EDTA, 1.25 g Tris (pH 9.5) containing 1 mL Triton X-100 and 1 g sodium lauryl sarcosinate] for 24 h at 4 ˚C and protected from light. Following cell lysis, all slides were washed with deionized water to remove salt and detergent from the microgels. Slides were then coded and placed in a specifically designed horizontal electrophoresis tank containing electrophoresis buffer [24.6 g NaCH3COO and 12.1 g Tris-HCl (pH 8.3)]. Electrophoresis was conducted at 0.6 V/cm, 12 mA for 1 h. After electrophoresis, slides were neutralized in neutralization buffer [48.5 g Tris (pH 7.5)] and the DNA fluorochrome SYBR Green (CinnaGen DNA Safe Stain, Cat. No.: EP5082) was applied for 30 min. Slides were rinsed briefly with double-distilled water and the coverslips were placed before image analysis. The fluorescent-labeled DNA was visualized using a fluorescence microscope and the resulting images were captured on a computer and processed with Comet score software. The parameters for the DNA damage analysis include % tail DNA and tail moment. The Tail Moment value is calculated using the software and the following relationship (Frenzilli et al. 2014). Tail moment= tail length (px) × % DNA in tail. In this relationship, the tail length is a parameter estimated by the software's light intensity (pixels).
Hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) The hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) was used to evaluate the functional integrity of the sperm membrane, based on coiled and swollen tails. This was performed by incubating 250 µL of frozen-thawed sperm sample with 1 mL of a 100 mOsm hypo-osmotic solution (0.9 g of fructose+0.49 g of sodium citrate per 100 mL of distilled water) at 37 ˚C for 45 min. After incubation, 5 µL of the mixture was spread with a coverslip on a warm slide. Two hundred sperm were evaluated (magnification 400×) with bright-field microscopy. Sperm with coiled tails were recorded (Revell and Mrode, 1994).
Chlortetracycline (CTC) assay Acrosomal and capacitation status were assessed using CTC staining as described previously (Perez et al. 1996) with a little modification. A CTC working solution (0.75 mM) was freshly prepared in a buffer containing Tris (20 mM), NaCl (130 mM), and D, L-cysteine (5 mM) at a pH of 7.4. Twenty microliters of sperm were mixed with 20 µL CTC working solution. The reaction was fixed by adding 5 µL of 1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 1 M Tris buffer (pH 7.4) and leaving 30 s at room temperature under dark conditions. Sperm were prepared on a clean microscope slide and examined under a fluorescent microscope at a magnification of ×400. All samples were processed in duplicates, and at least 200 spermatozoa per slide were scored. Two hundred sperm were categorized into three categories as follows: (1) uniform fluorescence head (un-capacitated spermatozoa); (2) post-acrosomal region without fluorescence (capacitated spermatozoa); and (3) fluorescent-free head or a thin fluorescent band on the equatorial segment (acrosome reacted spermatozoa).
Statistical analysis Data were statistically analyzed by GLM procedure of SAS software in a completely randomized design (SAS, 2004). Significance test was performed using Duncan’s multiple range tests at P < 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of concentration and sperm motility percentage before and after x-ray irradiation is shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in the concentration of sperm between the control and the irradiated groups. A significant increase in sperm motility percentage was observed after irradiation at a dose of 1.2 Gy compared to the control treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between experimental treatments for other motion parameters such as the percentage of sperm with progressive and circle motility. The percentage of fast motility of sperm was affected by x-ray irradiation so that fast motility was reduced at doses 0.6 and 0.9 Gy (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the fast motility of sperm between the control and other irradiated groups. X-ray radiation dose rate had a significant effect on the slow motility of sperm. Slow motility of sperm increased with increasing dose rate, with the lowest slow motility at a dose 0.3 Gy and the greatest slow motility was determined at a dose of 0.9 and 1.2 Gy (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in local motility of sperm between the control and the irradiated groups. The x-ray irradiation led to significant decreases in the percentage of immotile sperm (P<0.05). Sperm motility at a dose 1.2 Gy x-ray irradiation was higher (P<0.05) than in other treatments. Therefore, it was concluded that a dose of 1.2 Gy x-ray irradiation led to a 7% increase in sperm motility and 17% reduced in the immotility of sperm after freeze-thawing. One theory is that increased sperm motility could be due to motility in immotile sperm.
Table 1 Concentration (109/mL) and sperm motility percentage before and after x-ray irradiation The means within the same row with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05). SEM: standard error of the means.
Generally, it has been reported that the elevation in Ca2+ uptake by sperm plasma membrane vesicles was a consequence of Ca2+ binding to the membrane after irradiation (Lubart et al. 1997). Sperm basal motility depends on three crucial factors: the presence of ATP, concentration of intracellular calcium, and normal to alkaline intracellular pH (Lishko et al. 2016). The cation channel of sperm is a sperm-specific, weakly voltage-dependent, Ca2+ selective, pH-sensitive ion channel that controls the entry of positively charged calcium ions into sperm cells, which is essential for sperm motility and fertility (Singh and Rajender, 2014). The viability and morphological parameters of the frozen-thawed sperm before and after x-ray irradiation are presented in Table 2. The x-ray irradiation did not affect any of the sperm morphological parameters. The percentage of sperm viability was affected by x-ray irradiation after freezing and thawing. Therefore, sperm viability increased with increasing dose rate up to 0.9 Gy. The greatest viability level was found at a dose 0.9 Gy (P<0.05). The lowest sperm viability was observed at a dose 1.2 Gy. The non-significant changes that occur in the percentage of normal sperm in irradiated samples can be due to the effect of radiation on the creation resistance of sperm to morphological changes. Beneficial effects on body systems by some external agent, which with large doses exhibits a damaging effect, are called hormesis (Obodovskiy, 2019). Thus, hormesis is a process in which exposure to low-dose radiation that is damaging at higher doses induces an adaptive beneficial effect on the cell (Mattson, 2008; Kudryasheva and Rozhko, 2015). Tateno et al. (1996) studied the cytogenetic effects of x- and ¥-rays on the spermatozoa of the Chinese hamster and the Syrian hamster. These authors stated that there was no great difference in the induction of structural chromosome aberrations between X-irradiated (0.91, 1.82, 3.63) and y-irradiated (1.10, 2.15, 2.95, 4.01) spermatozoa. The amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) of the frozen-thawed sperm before and after x-ray irradiation is presented in Table 3. There was no significant difference in the amount of malondialdehyde in semen between the control and the irradiated groups. Furthermore, the increase in peroxide production rates was positively related to irradiation dose. Thus, irradiated treatment by low doses had a better preservation effect. However, Tateno et al. (1996) reported that doses of 0.91, 1.82, and 3.63 Gy of x-rays and 1.10, 2.15, 2.95, and 4.01 Gy of ¥-rays did not change the number of peroxides in sperm samples of two hamster species. Similarly, Hawas (2013) reported that low-dose gamma rays did not change the amount of malondialdehyde in the testis tissue of rats. DNA strand breaks parameters before and after x-ray irradiation are demonstrated in Table 3. The radiation dose rate had a significant effect on DNA damage in spermatozoa. DNA damage of sperm (observed comet, % tail DNA, Tail Moment) only showed a significant increase after the highest dose (1.2 Gy, 11.37, 21.72, 20.28) of x-ray irradiation was used (P<0.05). Therefore, it is concluded that a dose of 1.2 Gy x-ray irradiation led to an 18% increase in % tail DNA. There was no significant difference in DNA damage of sperm (observed comet, % tail DNA, Tail Moment) between the control and other irradiated groups. The obtained results were in-line with estimates of Parplys et al. (2012) and Han et al. (2014) who reported that ionizing irradiation induces several types of DNA lesions, base damage, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks through the production of free radicals. The percentage of plasma membrane integrity of sperm before and after x-ray irradiation is shown in Table 4. Plasma membrane integrity increased with increasing dose rate up to 0.9 Gy. The lowest plasma membrane integrity was determined at a dose of 1.2 Gy and the highest plasma membrane integrity was determined at a dose of 0.9 Gy (P<0.05). The HOST test assessed the resistance of the sperm plasma membrane to damage induced by the loss in permeability under the stress of swelling driven by the hypo-osmotic treatment (Sarıozkan et al. 2015).
Table 2 Sperm viability, normal and abnormal sperm percentage before and after x-ray irradiation (Gy) The means within the same row with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05). SEM: standard error of the means.
Table 3 Malondialdehyde (MDA) and DNA strand breaks parameters before and after x-ray irradiation (Gy) The means within the same row with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05). SEM: standard error of the means.
Table 4 Acrosome and plasma membrane integrity of sperm before and after x-ray irradiation (Gy) The means within the same row with at least one common letter, do not have significant difference (P>0.05). SEM: standard error of the means.
In this study, the percentage of plasma membrane integrity (HOST test) was increased up to 4% with the greatest plasma membrane integrity observed at a dose of 0.9 Gy x-ray irradiation. Moreover, an increase in the percentage of sperm membrane integrity in irradiated samples compared with non-irradiated samples may be due to the phenomenon of Hormesis. Holt (2000) and Portas et al. (2009) obtained some evidence that phase transitions might be involved in the manifestation of cryoinjury during the rewarming of cells after thawing. Accordingly, spermatozoa undergo these lipid phase transitions typically within the temperature of 37 ˚C. One interpretation of this data is that as the thawing temperature increases to 37 ˚C (40% of sperm is alive), the plasma membrane is subjected to structural rearrangements involving lipids and proteins, the extent and nature of which are governed by interactions of temperature and solute effects during the freezing process. Therefore, these results (plasma membrane integrity) could be attributed to the positive effects of radiation (in some cases) on improved sperm quality. The percentage of acrosome integrity of sperm before and after x-ray irradiation is shown in Table 4. A significant reduction in acrosome integrity percentage was observed after irradiation at a dose of 1.2 Gy compared to the control treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in acrosome integrity of sperm between the control and other irradiated groups except 1.2 Gy. Lubart et al. (1997) and Singh and Rajender (2014) reported that the elevation in Ca2+ uptake by sperm plasma membrane vesicles was a consequence of Ca2+ binding to the membrane after irradiation. The cation channel of sperm is a sperm-specific, weakly voltage-dependent, Ca2+ selective, pH-sensitive ion channel that controls the entry of positively charged calcium ions into sperm cells, which is essential for sperm motility and fertility. Intracellular calcium plays a vital role in cell proliferation, and in mammalian spermatozoa, it has a pivotal role in the control of sperm motility and acrosome reaction. Moreover, the researchers found an elevation in the concentration of cytoplasmic calcium ions in spermatozoa after irradiation (Tateno et al. 1996). According to sperm evaluation standards, sperm quality is desirable with a thawing temperature of 37 ˚C and acrosome integrity of more than 60% (Portas et al. 2009; Holt, 2000). Thus in the present study, although the acrosome integrity of sperm at a dose 1.2 Gy x-ray irradiation was lower than the control treatment, its amount was reported as more than 60% (sperm evaluation standard).
CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrated that x-ray irradiation at a dose of 0.9 Gy could increase the mitochondrial membrane activity and the motility and viability of sperms after thawing without negative effect on malondialdehyde concentration of semen and DNA strand breaks parameters, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome integrity of sperm while x-ray irradiation at a dose of 1.2 or more Gy deteriorates semen quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors are thankful to NDJ Company (Iran) for providing straws containing frozen sperm and performing sperm motility tests with CASA system. | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdel-Salam Z., Dessouki S.H.M., Abdel-Salam S.A.M., Ibrahim M.A.M., and Harith M.A. (2011). Green laser irradiation effects on buffalo semen. Theriogenology. 75, 988-994. Amirat-Briand L., Bencharif D., Vera-Munoz O., Bel Hadj Ali H., Destrumelle S., Desherces S., Schmidt E., Anton M. and Tainturier D. (2009). Effect of glutamine on post-thaw motility of bull spermatozoa after association with low-density lipoproteins (LDL) extender: Preliminary results. Theriogenology. 71, 1209-1214. Catalán J., Papas M., Gacem S., Noto F., Delgado-Bermúdez A., Rodríguez-Gil J.E., Miro J. and Yeste M. (2020). Effects of red-light irradiation on the function and survival of fresh and liquid-stored donkey semen. Theriogenology. 149, 88-97. Corral-Baqués M.I., Rigau T., Rivera M., Rodríguez J.E. and Rigau J. (2005). Effect of 655-nm diode laser on dog sperm motility. Lasers Med. Sci. 20, 28-34. Corral-Baqués M.I., Rivera M.M., Rigau T., Rodríguez-Gil J.E. and Rigau J. (2009). The effect of low-level laser irradiation on dog spermatozoa motility is dependent on laser output power. Lasers Med. Sci. 24, 703-713. Fernandes G.H.C., Carvalho P.D.T.C.D., Serra A.J., Crespilho A.M., Peron J.P.S., Rossato C., Leal-Junior E.C.P. and Albertini R. (2015). The effect of low-level laser irradiation on sperm motility, and integrity of the plasma membrane and acrosome in cryopreserved bovine sperm. PloS One. 10, 1-11. Frenzilli G., Bernardeschi M. and Barale R. (2014). Alkaline versus Neutral Version of Comet Assay in Human Leukocytes Using 9 Compounds. J. Transl. Toxicol. 1, 60-71. Han J., Won E.J., Lee B.Y., Hwang U.K., Kim I.C., Yim J.H., Leung K.M.Y., Lee Y.S. and Lee J.S. (2014). Gamma rays induce DNA damage and oxidative stress associated with impaired growth and reproduction in the copepod Tigriopus japonicas. Aquat. Toxicol. 152, 264-272. Hawas A.M. (2013). Effect of low dose gamma rays on certain essential metals and oxidative stress in different rat organs. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 6, 38-44. Holt W.V. (2000). Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62, 3-22. Iaffaldano N., Meluzzi A., Manchisi A. and Passarella S. (2005). Improvement of stored turkey semen quality as a result of He-Ne laser irradiation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 85, 317-325. Iaffaldano N., Paventi G., Pizzuto R., Di-Iorio M., Bailey J.L., Manchisi A. and Passarella S. (2016). Helium-neon laser irradiation of cryopreserved ram sperm enhances cytochromec oxidase activity and ATP levels improving semen quality. Theriogenology. 86, 778-784. Iaffaldano N., Rosato M.P., Paventi G., Pizzuto R., Gambacorta M., Manchisi A. and Passarella S. (2010). The irradiation of rabbit sperm cells with He–Ne laser prevents their in vitro liquid storage dependent damage. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 119, 123-129. Kudryasheva N.C. and Rozhko T.V. (2015). Effect of low-dose ionizing radiation on luminous marine bacteria: Radiation hormesis and toxicity. J. Environ. Radioact. 142, 68-77. Lishko P.V., Miller M.R. and Mansell S.A. (2016). The Role of Sperm Ion Channels in Reproduction. Ion Channels in Health and Disease, Academic Press, United States. Lubart R., Friedmann H., Sinyakov M., Cohen N. and Breitbart H. (1997). Changes in calcium transport in mammalian sperm mitochondria and plasma membranes caused by 780 nm irradiation. Lasers Surg. Med. 21, 493-499. Mattson M.P. (2008). Hormesis defined. Ageing. Res. Rev. 7, 1-7. Mohammadi G., Mahdion H., Goraninejad S. and Khadjeh G.H. (2011). Modified methods for evaluation of bull frozen-thawed sperm. J. Vet. Lab. Res. 3, 135-145. Obodovskiy I. (2019). Radiation: Fundamentals, Applications, Risks, and Safety, Academic Press, United States. Olive P.L. and Banath J.P. (2006). The comet assay: A method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 23-29. Parplys A.C., Petermann E., Petersen C., Dikomey E. and Borgmann K. (2012). DNA damage by X-rays and their impact on replication processes. Radiother. Oncol. 102, 466-471. Perez L.J., Valcarcel A., Heras M.A., Moses D.F. and Baldassarre H. (1996). In vitro capacitate and induction of acrosomal exocytosis in ram spermatozoa as assessed by the chlortetracycline assay. Theriogenology. 45, 1037-1046. Pezo F., Zambrano F., Uribe P., Ramírez-Reveco A., Romero F. and Sanchéz R. (2019). LED-based red light photostimulation improves short-term response of cooled boar semen exposed to thermal stress at 37 ˚C. Andrologia. 51, 1-8. Portas T., Johnston S.D., Hermes R., Arroyo F., Lopez-Fernadez C., Bryant B., Hildebrandt T.B., Goritz F. and Gosalvez J. (2009). Frozen-thawed rhinoceros sperm exhibit DNA damage shortly after thawing when assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion assay. Theriogenology. 72, 711-720. Prieto O.B., Catalán J., Lleonart M., Bonet S., Yeste M. and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. (2019). Red-light stimulation of boar semen prior to artificial insemination improves field fertility in farms: A worldwide survey. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 54, 1145-1148. Revell S.G. and Mrode R.A. (1994). An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 36, 77-86. Salama N. and El-Sawy M. (2015). Light-emitting diode exposure enhances sperm motility in men with and without asthenospermia: preliminary results. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 87, 14-19. Sarıozkan S., Bucak M.N., Tuncer P.B., Buyukleblebici S., Eken A. and Akay C. (2015). Influence of fetuin and hyaluronan on the post-thaw quality and fertilizing ability of Holstein bull semen. Cryobiology. 71, 119-124. SAS Institute. (2004). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA. Shawrang P. and Sadeghi A.A. (2013). Nuclear Techniques in the Nutrition and Physiology of Ruminant. Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch Publication. Tehran. Iran. Shawrang P., Rahbar M., Behgar M. and Motamedi-Sede F. (2020). Application of gamma irradiation to increase the motility and viability of bovine sperm after freezing and thawing. Res. Anim. Prod. 11, 136-141. Singh A.P. and Rajender S. (2014). CatSper channel, sperm function and male fertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 30, 28-38. Tateno H., Kamiguchi Y., Shimada M. and Mikamo K. (1996). Difference intype of radiation-induced structural choromosome aberrations and theirincidences between Chinese and Syrian hamster spermatozoa. Mutat. Res. 350, 339-348. Yeste M., Codony F., Estrada E., Lleonart M., Balasch S., Peña A., Bonet S. and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. (2016). Specific LED-based red light photo-stimulation procedures improve overall sperm function and reproductive performance of boar ejaculates. Sci. Rep. 6, 1-13. Zan-Bar T., Bartoov B., Segal R., Yehuda R., Lavi R., Lubart R. and Avtalion R.R. (2005). Influence of visible light and ultraviolet irradiation on motility and fertility of mammalian and fish sperm. Photomed. Laser Surg. 23, 549-555. Zeb A. and Ullah F. (2016). A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in fried fast foods. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2016, 1-5. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 282 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 264 |