Simulation of Solar Panel Maximum Power Point Tracking Using the Fuzzy Logic Control Method

Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering

مقاله 4، دوره 17، شماره 2، شهریور 2023، صفحه 29-39   

نوع مقاله: Reseach Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30486/mjee.2023.1987141.1148

نویسندگان

Anna Mutia¹؛ Dahlan Abdullah^{* 2}؛ Kraugusteeliana Kraugusteeliana³؛ Susatyo Adhi Pramono⁴؛ Hendi Sama⁵

¹Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia

²Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia

³Department of Information System, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

⁴Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto, Indonesia

⁵Department of Information System, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia

چکیده

The use of solar energy has begun to be developed in PLTS, but the photovoltaic module electricity produced is not at maximum output power. To increase the efficiency of the photovoltaic module, Maximum PowerPoint Tracking (MPPT) technology is used. Differences in the level of solar energy irradiation can cause the output power of the solar panels to vary and will not be maximized. Changing temperature and irradiation can be maintained with a maximum voltage of 40Volt and according to what is desired. In this study, MPPT consists of a Boost Converter whose function is to regulate the output voltage, while the algorithm used is the fuzzy logic which works based on Error (E) and Change Error (CE) from changes in the voltage and current of the photovoltaic module. The results showed that after using MPPT when input was given a change in load resistance with irradiation of 1000 W/m2 and a temperature of 25 ℃ resulted in a difference in power under different conditions compared to a system without MPPT. The power generated without the use of MPPT has a significant change with the results of 227.7W, 114.4W, 76.5W, 57W, and 45.5W. Testing the system after installing the MPPT when given an input change in irradiation with a load resistance of 20 Ω and a temperature of 25°C, a more stable power is produced with a value of 0.008W. Then when the input changes to irradiation with a load resistance of 20 Ω and a temperature of 25 ℃, the maximum power produced for each of the highest irrigation is 746.9 W/m2, 779.4 W/m2, and 839.4 W/m2 of 38.88 W, 42.07 W, and 47.8 W and compared to the system without MPPT only 21.76W, 21.96W and 22.28W.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Maximum Powerpoint Tracking؛ Photovoltaic Module؛ Boost Converter؛ Fuzzy Logic

سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله

4-2205-1148.pdf

مراجع

• [1] Sutikno, A. C. Subrata, and A. Elkhateb, “Evaluation of Fuzzy Membership Function Effects for Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique of Photovoltaic System,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 109157–109165, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102050.
• [2] Kamal, M. Karabacak, S. Z. Hassan, H. Li, and L. M. Fernandez-Ramirez, “A Robust Online Adaptive B-Spline MPPT Control of Three-Phase Grid-Coupled Photovoltaic Systems under Real Partial Shading Condition,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 202–210, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2018.2878358.
• [3] Priyadarshi, S. Padmanaban, J. B. Holm-Nielsen, F. Blaabjerg, and M. S. Bhaskar, “An Experimental Estimation of Hybrid ANFIS-PSO-Based MPPT for PV Grid Integration under Fluctuating Sun Irradiance,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1218–1229, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2949083.
• [4] “A combined reinforcement learning and sliding mode control scheme for grid integration of a PV System,” CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., 2019, doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2017.01000.
• [5] Rezk, M. Aly, M. Al-Dhaifallah, and M. Shoyama, “Design and Hardware Implementation of New Adaptive Fuzzy Logic-Based MPPT Control Method for Photovoltaic Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 106427–106438, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932694.
• [6] Dhimish, “70% Decrease of Hot-Spotted Photovoltaic Modules Output Power Loss Using Novel MPPT Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 2027–2031, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2019.2893533.
• [7] Alsumiri, “Residual Incremental Conductance Based Nonparametric MPPT Control for Solar Photovoltaic Energy Conversion System,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 87901–87906, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925687.
• [8] M. Riquelme-Dominguez and S. Martinez, “Systematic Evaluation of Photovoltaic MPPT Algorithms Using State-Space Models Under Different Dynamic Test Procedures,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 45772–45783, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3170714.
• [9] Xu, R. Shao, B. Cao, and L. Chang, “Single-phase grid-connected PV system with golden section search-based MPPT algorithm,” Chinese J. Electr. Eng., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 25–36, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.23919/CJEE.2021.000035.
• [10] Uprety and H. Lee, “A 0.65-mW-to-1-W Photovoltaic Energy Harvester with Irradiance-Aware Auto-Configurable Hybrid MPPT Achieving >95% MPPT Efficiency and 2.9-ms FOCV Transient Time,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1827–1836, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2020.3042753.
• [11] Sajadian, R. Ahmadi, and H. Zargarzadeh, “Extremum Seeking-Based Model Predictive MPPT for Grid-Tied Z-Source Inverter for Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 216–227, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2018.2867585.
• [12] C. Chang and S. I. Liu, “An Indoor Photovoltaic Energy Harvester Using Time-Based MPPT and On-Chip Photovoltaic Cell,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2432–2436, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2020.2976760.
• [13] Jinpeng, Y. Qinxue, Z. Bo, Jeremy-Gillbanks, and Z. Xin, “Study on MPPT Algorithm Based on an Efficient Hybrid Conjugate Gradient Method in a Photovoltaic System,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 4219–4227, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3233826.
• [14] Padmanaban, N. Priyadarshi, M. S. Bhaskar, J. B. Holm-Nielsen, V. K. Ramachandaramurthy, and E. Hossain, “A Hybrid ANFIS-ABC Based MPPT Controller for PV System with Anti-Islanding Grid Protection: Experimental Realization,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 103377–103389, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931547.
• [15] Farah, A. Hussain, A. Kerrouche, C. Ieracitano, J. Ahmad, and M. Mahmud, “A highly-efficient fuzzy-based controller with high reduction inputs and membership functions for a grid-connected photovoltaic system,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 163225–163237, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016981.
• [16] Abdel-Rahim, “A New High Gain DC-DC Converter With Model-Predictive-Control Based MPPT Technique for Photovoltaic Systems,” CPSS Trans. Power Electron. Appl., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191–200, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.24295/CPSSTPEA.2020.00016.
• [17] Li, D. Yang, W. Su, J. Lu, and X. Yu, “An Overall Distribution Particle Swarm Optimization MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic System under Partial Shading,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 265–275, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2829668.
• [18] N. Ali, K. Mahmoud, M. Lehtonen, and M. M. F. Darwish, “An Efficient Fuzzy-Logic Based Variable-Step Incremental Conductance MPPT Method for Grid-Connected PV Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 26420–26430, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058052.
• [19] Echalih et al., “A Cascaded Controller for a Grid-Tied Photovoltaic System with Three-Phase Half-Bridge Interleaved Buck Shunt Active Power Filter: Hybrid Control Strategy and Fuzzy Logic Approach,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 320–330, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JETCAS.2022.3152535.
• [20] A. Sher, A. F. Murtaza, A. Noman, K. E. Addoweesh, K. Al-Haddad, and M. Chiaberge, “A New Sensorless Hybrid MPPT Algorithm Based on Fractional Short-Circuit Current Measurement and P&O MPPT,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1426–1434, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2438781.