A combined Model design for developing and optimizing product platform architecture considering parameters of DFV, DFC, DFSC, and DFAv, case study: phased array radar

Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering

مقاله 9، دوره 16، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 35، آذر 2024، صفحه 115-130   

نوع مقاله: Original Manuscript

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22094/joie.2023.1981834.2050

نویسندگان

Masoud Merati¹؛ Mahdi Karbasian^{* 1، 2}؛ Abbas Toloie Ashlaghi¹؛ Hasan Haleh³

¹Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

²Department of Industrial Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Esfahan, Iran.

³Department of Industrial Engineering, Golpayegan Technical and Engineering Faculty, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran

چکیده

Developing a robust platform architecture can give companies a competitive edge and enhance product future generations and customer satisfaction. However, in order to develop a product platform architecture, there is a need for some kind a product variety design that concurrently manages costs and the supply chain process, and focuses on ease of use and improved availability to components. In this research, the design for variety (DFV) approach and two indices, generational variety index (GVI) and coupling index (CI) are used to measure a product architecture. Using the quality function deployment (QFD) and design structure matrix (DSM), design indices for product diversity are identified and ranked. Additionally, the design for variety approach is modeled simultaneously with the concepts of design for cost (DFC), design for availability (DFAv), and design for supply chain (DFSC) to yield a practical mathematical model for the development of the product platform architecture, which aims for product diversity, improved availability, reduced costs, and supply chain management. The case study of the current research is a phased array radar, which is optimized using the latest techniques (genetic algorithm) and MATLAB software to solve the problem. After implementing the model, considering four objectives including total cost, availability, supplier evaluation score (competency) and replaceability (variety), and seven main parameters of the model, sensitivity analysis and other comparisons and results are presented, which analyzes the relationships between objectives, the impressment and affectability of objectives and model parameters on each other. Regarding the comparison of objectives, the results generally show the inverse relationship between the total cost objective and the other objectives, and the direct relationship between the other objectives with each other. Additionally, the results of the sensitivity analysis performed indicate that the availability objective had the highest effect and replaceability (variety) and the evaluation score of suppliers (competency) and total cost also took next place.

کلیدواژه‌ها

: Product Platform؛ Design for Variety (DFV)؛ Design for Cost (DFC)؛ Design for Availability (DFAv)؛ Design for Supply Chain (DFSC)؛ Phased Array Radar

مراجع

Amid, A. and Ghodsypour, S.H. and O’Brien, C. (2006). Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain, International Journal of  Production Economics, 104

Barrar, Hicham and Ruiz-Benitez, Rocio .(2023). Exploratory study of the impact of the supply chain on integrated product-service systems design, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 29 No. 1 

Boer, Henrike and Boer, Harry. (2018). Design-for-variety and operational performance The mediating role of internal, supplier and customer integration, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Bolhasani, Parisa and Falah, Mohammad and Tawakli Moghadam, Reza and Alam Tabriz, Akbar (2022). Presenting a multi-objective mathematical model for the location-routing-inventory problem of hazardous materials considering elastic demand and queuing system, Journal of Decision and Operations Research, Vol. 6, No. 2

Bortolini, M and Calabrese, F and Gabriele Galizia, F and Regattieri, A. (2023). A two‑step methodology for product platform design and assessment In high‑variety manufacturing, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. volume 126

Brian Morrison, B .(2016). Design for Excellence (DFX) Driving Product Optimization Through Early Stage Supplier Engagement, manufacturing partner to innovators

Dadfar, H and Dahlgaard, J. J and Brege, S and Alamirhoor, A. (2013). "Linkage between organisational innovation capability, product platform development and performance: The case of pharmaceutical small and medium enterprises in Iran", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 24(7-8)

Dambietz, F. M., Greve, E., Krause, D. (2021). Simulation-Based Performance Analysis for Future Robust Modular Product Architectures, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, August 2021

Greve, E and Fuchs, C and Hamraz, B and Windheim, M and Krause, D.(2021). Design for future variety to enable long-term benefits of modular product families, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-20 August 2021

Hauser, J. R. and D. Clausing. (1988). “The House of Quality”, Harvard Business Review, 66 (3)

Holtta-Otto, Katja. (2005). Modular Product Platform Design, Doctoral Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Machine Design

Hou, Shixuan and Gao, Jie and Wang, Chun. (2021). Design for mass customisation, design for manufacturing, and design for supply chain: A review of the literature, The institution of Engineering and Technology, 4(1)

Itani, Anas and Ahmad, Rafiq and Al-Hussein, Mohamed. (2019). A Collaborative Scheme for DFX Techniques in Concurrent Engineering Mitigated with Total Design Activity Model, International Conference on Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings, May 2019, Banff, Canada

Jiao, Jianxin and Zhang, Lianfeng and Pokharel, Shaligram. (2007). Process Platform Planning for Variety Coordination From Design to Production in Mass Customization Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(1)

Karbasian, M and Mohebbi, B and khayambashi, B and cheshmberah, M and Morady. G, M. (2015).  Maximum Maintainability of Complex Systems via Modulation Based on DSM and Module Layout Case Study: Laser Range finder, International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 26(4)

Kipp, T and Krause, D. (2008).   Design For Variety – Efficient  Support For  Design Engineers, International Design Conference - Design 2008 , Dubrovnik – Croatia

Kwansuk, Oh and Jong Wook, Lim and Seongwon, Cho and Junyeol, Ryu and Yoo S., Hong .(2019). A Framework for Development Architecture for Modular Products: Cross-Domain Variety Management Perspective, Proceedings of the Design Society International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED19 5-8 August 2019, Delft, The Netherlands

Lamothe, J  and Hadj-Hamou, K and Aldanondo, M. (2018). An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain, Journal of Operational Research,169 (3)

Landahl, J and Johannesson, H. (2018). Product Variety And Variety In Production, International Design Conference - Design 2018

Li,Congdong and Wu , Run and Yang, Weiming. (2022). Optimization and selection of the multi-objective conceptual design scheme for considering product assembly, manufacturing and cost, a springer nature journal

Liu, A and Hu, H and Zhang, X and Lei, D. (2017). Novel two-phase approach for process optimization of customer collaborative design based on fuzzy-QFD and DSM. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(2)

Long, Daniel.(2020). System Excess Placement for Improving Lifecycle Value, PhD thesis, Faculty of North Carolina State University

Martin, M.V. and K.J.M.E.T. Ishii (2000).  Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures , Proceedings of DETC2000ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences September 10 - 13, 2000, Baltimore, MD

Martin, M.V. and K.J.M.E.T. Ishii. (1999). Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures, PhD thesis, Stanford University

Meireles Carneiro, Tomas de. (2020). The articulation of advanced tools for product development, A thesis presented for the degree of Master in Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto Porto, Portugal

Moroson, Bogdan. (2022). Design For Excellence (DFX). NeuronicWorks Inc, Handbook of North York, Canada

Moubachir, Y and Bouami, D. (2015). A new approach for the transition between QFD phases. Procedia Cirp, 26, 82-86.

Rennpferdt, Christoph and Greve, Erik and Krause, Dieter. (2021). Variety-driven design to reduce complexity costs of a tire curing press family, 31st CIRP Design Conference 2021 ,  Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Product Development and Mechanical Engineering Design, Denickestrasse 17, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Rubio-Maya, Olivier and Guarin-Grisale, Alvaro and Carrizosa-Isaza, Pablo .(2014). Aplicaction of the Methodology for the Design Variety (DFV) in  the Development of a Plataform of Productos, DYNA, 89(3)

Sassanelli, C and Pezzotta, G and Pirola, F and Terzi, S and Rossi, M. (2016). Design for Product Service Supportability (DfPSS) approach: a state of the art to foster Product Service System (PSS) design. In Product-Service Systems across Life Cycle, 2016 . Elsevier.

Sharifi, H and Ismail, H. S. and Reid, I. (2006). Achieving agility in supply chain through simultaneous “design of” and “design for” supply chain,  Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(8)

Shojaeefarda, M and Khalkhalib, A and Tavakoli Lahijanic, A. (2017). Using Design For Variety and Axiomatic Design To Architect Automotive Underbody, International journal of advanced production and industrial engineering, 2 (2)

Sohailifar, Mohammad Reza and Sadeqzadeh, Ramzan Ali (2016). Phased Array Antennas, Tehran, Student Technical Publications, first edition

Stapelberg, Rudolph Frederick.(2009). Handbook of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design. Springer London

Veenstra, Vanessa S and Halman, Johannes I. M. and Voordijk, Johannes T. (2006). A methodology for developing product platforms in the specific setting of the housebuilding industry, Res Eng Design

Vinay Ashokbhai, Parikh. (2020). Development of Supply Chain Model For Improved Productivity in Capital and Industrial Goods Manufacturing Industry,  A PhD Synopsis  Submitted to Gujarat Technological Universityfor the Degree of  Doctor of Philosophy

Xiaochuan, Chen and Jianguo, Yang., Beizhi, Li. (2004). Methodology and Technology of Design For Cost (DFC), The 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, (WCICA'04)June 14-18, 2004, Hangzhou, China

Xu, Luo and Yongmin, Yang and Zhexue, Ge and Xisen, WEN and Fengjiao, Guan. (2014). Layout problem of multicomponent systems arising for improving maintainability, J. Cent. South Univ