Investigating Lexico-grammaticality in Academic Abstracts and Their Full Research Papers from a Diachronic Perspective

Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice

مقاله 10، دوره 9، شماره 19، بهمن 2016، صفحه 178-197   

نوع مقاله: Research Paper

نویسندگان

Valeh Valipour^* ؛ Nader Asadi Aidinlu؛ Haniyeh Davatgari Asl

Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

چکیده

Development of science and academic knowledge has led to changes in academic language and transfer of information and knowledge. In this regard, the present study is an attempt to investigate lexico-grammaticality in academic abstracts and their full research papers in Linguistics, Chemistry and Electrical engineering papers published during 1991-2015 in academic journals from a diachronic perspective through quantitative research design. The focus of this paper is on transitivity, mood and theme analysis in the corpus according to Halliday's (1994) systemic functional linguistics model. So, all the attempts are to find the changes in abstracts and research papers of these disciplines and how they are to be positioned in different linguistic contexts over time. The results revealed that research papers employ the spectrum of possible lexical realization quite differently as compared to general English, especially concerning the use of specific lexical items. Also, the results of chi-squares of each discipline showed that there are significant differences between papers over time at .05 level of significance (.000< .05) with regard to the transitivity, mood, and theme. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

lexico-grammaticality؛ academic papers؛ metafunctions؛ Systemic Functional Linguistics

مراجع

Arancon, P. (2013). The use of SFL genre theory for the analysis of students' writing skills in ESP. RaeL Revista Electronica de Linguistica Aplicada. (Annual 2013): p245.

Atkinson, D. (1992). The Evolution of Medical Research Writing from 1735 to 1985: The Case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics, 13 (4), 337-374.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), M M Bakhtin: Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactments of social inten-

       tions. London:  Taylor & Frances.

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorers Guide (2nd ed.). Sidney: NCELRT.

IŞIK TAŞ, Elvan Eda (2008). A corpus-based analysis of Genre-specific Discourse of Research: The Ph.D. Thesis and the Research article in ELT. METU Library Theses and Dissertations Archives.

Halliday, M. A. K., &  Martin, J. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London, Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press. p.76.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold. p. 15.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold, 3 ed.

Hartley, J. (1999). Applying ergonomics to Applied Ergonomics: using structured abstracts. Applied Ergonomics, 30 (6), 535-541.

Holtz, M^onica (2011). Lexico-grammatical properties of abstracts and research papers: A corpus-based study of academic discourse from multiple disciplines. Ph.D. Thesis. Darmstadt. urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-26386

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.) Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School, (pp. 3-39). London and Washington: Cassell.

Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.

Qurrat-ul-Ain et al. (2015). Generic and Lexico-grammatical Patterns of  Job Application Letters Sent to the Educational Institutes of Faisalabad. ELF Annual Research Journal, 17, 163 -182.

Scott, M. (2011). WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 6. Lexical Analysis Software Ltd.

Scott, M. (2016). WordSmith Tools (Version 7) [Computer software]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Valle, Ellen (1999). A Collective Intelligence, The life sciences in the Royal Society as an academic discourse community.Pp. 104-147. Turku: Angliana Turkuensia.     

Zhen-ye, N. (2008). A genre-based analysis of English research article abstracts and the linguistic feature of personal pronouns for financial economics.  US-China Education Review, ISSN1548-6613.