Designing a Model for Translation of Technical Terminology

Research in English Language Pedagogy

مقاله 5، دوره 1، شماره 2، خرداد 2014، صفحه 40-48   

نویسنده

Shadi Forutanian^*

Department of Foreign Languages, Sepahan University

چکیده

Technical terminology has a significant role in translation of technical or scientific texts. Unfortunately, most of research in this area has not perceived the
urgent need for a model to analyze or shown how translate technical or scientific terminology. In this paper, the researcher attempts to designs a workable model
for translation of technical or scientific terminology. The major aim of this model is to provide a real equivalence for both one word terms and above words terms.
The design of such a model benefits from different theories about equivalence and approaches that are used for finding real equivalence which translation studies
especially technical translation are still lacking.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Model Designing؛ Translation of Terminologies؛ Technical terminology؛ English-Persian Translation

مراجع

Abigail, M. (2005).Translation equivalence for health/medical terminology in
         Xitsonga.Retrieved April 23, 2011, from http://upetd.up.ac.za /available/
        etd-02152006-152056/.../00dissertation.pdf.
Bay, H. (2005).A study on the translation of economic terminology. Retrieved
       October 11, 2011, from http:// data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/
       560
Baker, M. (1992).In other words:A course book on translation.London and New
        York; Routledge.
Bell, R.T. (1991). Translation and translating: theory and practice. New York:
        Long man Inc.
Catford, J.C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation. Oxford: OUP.
Cohen, L. (2007). Research method in education. London and New York:
        Routledge.
Edem, B. (2000).Terminology and language planning. North America: John
       Benjamins.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar.  London:
       Edward Amold.
Hann, M. (1992).The key to technical translation. Amsterdam, & Philadelphia,
        John Benjamins.
Hatim, B & Mason, I. (1990).Discourse and the Translator.London/Newyork.
         Longman.
Munday, J. (2001). Introducing translation studies, theories and applications.
         London and New York: Routledge, p. 36.
Newmark, P. (1991). About translation.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. London and New York: Prentice
         Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Nida, E. A. and Taber, C. R. (1982).The theory and practice of translation, Leiden:
         E.J. Brill.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Olohan, M. (2004).Introducing corpora in translation study. London and New
         York: Routledge.
Pearson, J. (2000).Terms in context. North America: John Benjamins.
Pym, A. (2007). Natural and directional equivalence in theories of translation.
         Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Snell-Hornby, M. (1988). Translation studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam
        and Philadelphia: J. Benjamin’s Publishing House.
Temmerman, R. (2000).Towards new ways of terminology description: The
       sociocognitive approach. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Thanh, P. (2010).Strategies to deal with non-equivalence at word level in translation.
        Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http:// web.hanu.vn/deck/file.php/1/
        Non-equivalent-Binh.pdf
Wills, W. (1982).Thescience of translation: problems and methods. Tubingen:
        GunterNarrVerlag.